A robust algorithm for automated target recognition using precomputed radar cross sections

Passive radar is an emerging technology that offers a number of unique benefits, including covert operation. Many such systems are already capable of detecting and tracking aircraft. The goal of this work is to develop a robust algorithm for adding automated target recognition (ATR) capabilities to existing passive radar systems. In previous papers, we proposed conducting ATR by comparing the precomputed RCS of known targets to that of detected targets. To make the precomputed RCS as accurate as possible, a coordinated flight model is used to estimate aircraft orientation. Once the aircraft's position and orientation are known, it is possible to determine the incident and observed angles on the aircraft, relative to the transmitter and receiver. This makes it possible to extract the appropriate radar cross section (RCS) from our simulated database. This RCS is then scaled to account for propagation losses and the receiver's antenna gain. A Rician likelihood model compares these expected signals from different targets to the received target profile. We have previously employed Monte Carlo runs to gauge the probability of error in the ATR algorithm; however, generation of a statistically significant set of Monte Carlo runs is computationally intensive. As an alternative to Monte Carlo runs, we derive the relative entropy (also known as Kullback-Liebler distance) between two Rician distributions. Since the probability of Type II error in our hypothesis testing problem can be expressed as a function of the relative entropy via Stein's Lemma, this provides us with a computationally efficient method for determining an upper bound on our algorithm's performance. It also provides great insight into the types of classification errors we can expect from our algorithm. This paper compares the numerically approximated probability of Type II error with the results obtained from a set of Monte Carlo runs.

[1]  Gordon J. Frazer,et al.  Waveform analysis of transmissions of opportunity for passive radar , 1999, ISSPA '99. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Signal Processing and its Applications (IEEE Cat. No.99EX359).

[2]  E.K. Walton,et al.  Comparison of Two Target Classification Techniques , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[3]  Lisa M. Ehrman,et al.  Automated target recognition using passive radar and coordinated flight models , 2003, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[4]  Lisa M. Ehrman,et al.  Target Identification Using Modeled Radar Cross Sections and a Coordinated Flight Model , 2003 .

[5]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[6]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Automatic target recognition using sequences of high resolution radar range-profiles , 2000, IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst..

[7]  David K. Barton,et al.  Modern Radar System Analysis , 1988 .

[8]  Shawn Michael Herman,et al.  A Particle Filtering Approach to Joint Passive Radar Tracking and Target Classification , 2002 .

[9]  A. Ksienski,et al.  Optimum Frequencies for Aircraft Classification , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  S. J. Anderson,et al.  DSTO Waveform Analysis of Transmitters of Opportunity for Passive Radar , 1999 .

[11]  A. A. Ksienski,et al.  Identification of complex geometrical shapes by means of low-frequency radar returns , 1976 .

[12]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[13]  John D. Sahr,et al.  The Manastash Ridge radar: A passive bistatic radar for upper atmospheric radio science , 1997 .

[14]  Pierre Moulin,et al.  A particle filtering approach to FM-band passive radar tracking and automatic target recognition , 2002, Proceedings, IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[15]  Joseph A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Kullback-Leibler distances for quantifying clutter and models , 1999 .