Edge-Tree Correction for Predicting Forest Inventory Attributes Using Area-Based Approach With Airborne Laser Scanning

We describe a novel method to improve the correspondence between field and airborne laser scanning (ALS) measurements in an area-based approach (ABA) forest inventory framework. An established practice in forest inventory is that trees with boles falling within a fixed border field measurement plot are considered “in” trees; yet their crowns may extend beyond the plot border. Likewise, a tree bole may fall outside of a plot, but its crown may extend into a plot. Typical ABA approaches do not recognize these discrepancies between the ALS data extracted for a given plot and the corresponding field measurements. In the proposed solution, enhanced ABA (EABA), predicted tree positions, and crown shapes are used to adjust plot and grid cell boundaries and how ALS metrics are computed. The idea is to append crowns of “in” trees to a plot and cut down “out” trees, then EABA continues in the traditional fashion as ABA. The EABA method requires higher density ALS data than ABA because improvement is obtained by means of detecting individual trees. When compared to typical ABA, the proposed EABA method decreased the error rate (RMSE) of stem volume prediction from 23.16% to 19.11% with 127 m2 plots and from 19.08% to 16.95% with 254 m2 plots. The greatest improvements were obtained for plots with the largest residuals.

[1]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[2]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Predicting individual stem volumes of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[3]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[4]  G. Asner,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in mapping forest carbon with airborne LiDAR , 2011 .

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[6]  J. Gove,et al.  Forest inventory , 2001 .

[7]  M. Maltamo,et al.  The k-MSN method for the prediction of species-specific stand attributes using airborne laser scanning and aerial photographs , 2007 .

[8]  P. Axelsson DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[9]  Ilkka Korpela,et al.  Mapping forest plots: an efficient method combining photogrammetry and field triangulation , 2007 .

[10]  Göran Ståhl,et al.  Model-assisted estimation of change in forest biomass over an 11 year period in a sample survey supported by airborne LiDAR: A case study with post-stratification to provide “activity data” , 2013 .

[11]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  An International Comparison of Individual Tree Detection and Extraction Using Airborne Laser Scanning , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Comparative testing of single-tree detection algorithms under different types of forest , 2011 .

[13]  John M. Gauch,et al.  Image segmentation and analysis via multiscale gradient watershed hierarchies , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  D. Ruppert The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2004 .

[15]  M. Maltamo,et al.  Imputation of single-tree attributes using airborne laser scanning-based height, intensity, and alpha shape metrics , 2010 .

[16]  P. M. Narendra,et al.  Image Segmentation with Directed Trees , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[17]  M. Maltamo,et al.  ADAPTIVE METHODS FOR INDIVIDUAL TREE DETECTION ON AIRBORNE LASER BASED CANOPY HEIGHT MODEL , 2004 .

[18]  Jouko Laasasenaho Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch [Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies, Betula pendula, Betula pubescens] , 1982 .

[19]  Joanne C. White,et al.  The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management , 2008 .

[20]  Richard G. Oderwald,et al.  Technical note: Canopy height models and airborne lasers to estimate forest biomass: Two problems , 2000 .