Degradation of the resource state in port-based teleportation scheme

Port-based teleportation (PBT) is a protocol of quantum teleportation in which a receiver does not have to apply correction to the transmitted state. In this protocol two spatially separated parties can teleport an unknown quantum state only by exploiting joint measurements on shared d−dimensional maximally entangled states (resource state) together with a state to be teleported and one way classical communication. In this paper we analyse degradation of the resource state after one round of PBT and implications for the recycling protocol for deterministic PBT introduced earlier. In the recycling protocol the main idea is to re-use the remaining resource state after one or many rounds of PBT for further processes of teleportation. It was stated by other authors that the recycling protocol is effective by arguing that the resource state does not degrade too much after each round of teleportation process. In particular, there is a claim that the fidelity between ideal resource state and its real version, each of them after one round of PBT, reaches asymptotically 1 when the number of shared entangled pairs tends to infinity. Here, considering original setup for the recycling protocol, we disprove these claims. We show the resource state is heavily distorted after even one round of PBT with fidelity not exceeding the value 1/d. This bound was obtained by referring only to Schwarz inequality and general properties of measurements exploited in the protocol. As additional results we present explicit formula for the mentioned fidelity involving group-theoretic parameters describing irreducible representations in the Schur-Weyl duality. For the first time, we also analyse the degradation of the resource state for the optimal PBT scheme and show its substantial distortion for all d ≥ 2. In the both versions, the qubit case is discussed separately resulting in compact expression for fidelity, depending only on the number of shared entangled pairs. Additionally, we present arguments that fidelity between the ideal and the real state after one round of PBT is not the quantity which judges about the usefulness of the post-measurement state for the next rounds of PBT.

[1]  M. Horodecki,et al.  A simplified formalism of the algebra of partially transposed permutation operators with applications , 2017, 1708.02434.

[2]  Soojoon Lee,et al.  Generalization of port-based teleportation and controlled teleportation capability , 2020, 2002.12651.

[3]  Mário Ziman,et al.  Optimal Probabilistic Storage and Retrieval of Unitary Channels. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[4]  Satoshi Ishizaka,et al.  Asymptotic teleportation scheme as a universal programmable quantum processor. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[5]  M. Murao,et al.  Reversing Unknown Quantum Transformations: Universal Quantum Circuit for Inverting General Unitary Operations. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[6]  Jonathan Oppenheim,et al.  Generalized teleportation and entanglement recycling. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[7]  H. Buhrman,et al.  Quantum communication complexity advantage implies violation of a Bell inequality , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Jozsa An introduction to measurement based quantum computation , 2005, quant-ph/0508124.

[9]  Seth Lloyd,et al.  Convex optimization of programmable quantum computers , 2019, npj Quantum Information.

[10]  Giulio Chiribella,et al.  Quantum speedup in the identification of cause–effect relations , 2018, Nature Communications.

[11]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  Asymptotic Performance of Port-Based Teleportation , 2018, Communications in Mathematical Physics.

[12]  W. Fulton Young Tableaux: With Applications to Representation Theory and Geometry , 1996 .

[13]  Michał Horodecki,et al.  Port-based teleportation in arbitrary dimension , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Felix Leditzky Optimality of the pretty good measurement for port-based teleportation , 2020, 2008.11194.

[15]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Characterising port-based teleportation as universal simulator of qubit channels , 2021, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[16]  László Losonczi,et al.  Eigenvalues and eigenvectors of some tridiagonal matrices , 1992 .

[17]  Salman Beigi,et al.  Simplified instantaneous non-local quantum computation with applications to position-based cryptography , 2011, 1101.1065.

[18]  Isaac L. Chuang,et al.  Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations , 1999, Nature.

[19]  R Raussendorf,et al.  A one-way quantum computer. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[20]  Mário Ziman,et al.  Programmable Quantum Gate Arrays , 2001 .

[21]  Stefano Pirandola,et al.  Fundamental limits to quantum channel discrimination , 2018, npj Quantum Information.

[22]  D. Gross,et al.  Novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[23]  Structure and properties of the algebra of partially transposed permutation operators , 2013, 1308.2653.

[24]  J. Eisert,et al.  Advances in quantum teleportation , 2015, Nature Photonics.

[25]  Satoshi Ishizaka,et al.  Quantum teleportation scheme by selecting one of multiple output ports , 2009, 0901.2975.

[26]  M. Murao,et al.  Quantum telecloning and multiparticle entanglement , 1998, quant-ph/9806082.

[27]  Michal Horodecki,et al.  Optimal port-based teleportation , 2017, 1707.08456.

[28]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Teleporting an unknown quantum state via dual classical and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen channels. , 1993, Physical review letters.