Automated FES for Upper Limb Rehabilitation Following Stroke and Spinal Cord Injury

Neurorehabilitation aims to induce beneficial neural plasticity in order to restore function following injury to the nervous system. There is an increasing evidence that appropriately timed functional electrical stimulation (FES) can promote associative plasticity, but the dosage is critical for lasting functional benefits. Here, we present a novel approach to closed-loop control of muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of reach-to-grasp movements following stroke and spinal cord injury (SCI). We developed a simple, low-cost device to deliver assistive stimulation contingent on users’ self-initiated movements. The device allows repeated practice with minimal input by a therapist, and is potentially suitable for home use. Pilot data demonstrate usability by people with upper limb weakness following SCI and stroke, and participant feedback was positive. Moreover, repeated training with the device over 1–2 weeks led to functional benefits on a general object manipulation assessment. Thus, automated FES delivered by this novel device may provide a promising and readily translatable therapy for upper limb rehabilitation for people with stroke and SCI.

[1]  R. Lyle.  A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research , 1981, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[2]  G. Mead,et al.  Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. , 2014, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[3]  Danielle M. Santarelli,et al.  The Developing Brain , 2017 .

[4]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.

[5]  M. Hallett,et al.  Rapid plasticity of human cortical movement representation induced by practice. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  K. Anderson.  Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[7]  Jonas B. Zimmermann,et al.  Neural interfaces for the brain and spinal cord—restoring motor function , 2012, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[8]  Emma Hallewell,et al.  Computational models of upper-limb motion during functional reaching tasks for application in FES-based stroke rehabilitation , 2015, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[10]  D. Sommerfeld,et al.  Limited fine hand use after stroke and its association with other disabilities. , 2008, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  Steve I Perlmutter,et al.  Targeted, activity-dependent spinal stimulation produces long-lasting motor recovery in chronic cervical spinal cord injury , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  A. Catz,et al.  Development and validation of a self-report version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) , 2012, Spinal Cord.

[13]  Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) 2016 Facts and Figures at a Glance , 2016, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[14]  P. Taylor,et al.  Upper limb functional electrical stimulation devices and their man–machine interfaces , 2015, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[15]  Richard B. Stein,et al.  Does Functional Electrical Stimulation for Foot Drop Strengthen Corticospinal Connections? , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[16]  Andrei Krassioukov,et al.  International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury, revised 2011. , 2012, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[17]  Monica A. Perez,et al.  Motor Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury Enhanced by Strengthening Corticospinal Synaptic Transmission , 2012, Current Biology.

[18]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  Restoring brain function after stroke — bridging the gap between animals and humans , 2017, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[19]  T. Sinkjaer,et al.  Clinical evaluation of Functional Electrical Therapy in acute hemiplegic subjects. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[21]  Akio Kimura,et al.  Effects of integrated volitional control electrical stimulation (IVES) on upper extremity function in chronic stroke. , 2011, The Keio journal of medicine.

[22]  D. Farina,et al.  Precise temporal association between cortical potentials evoked by motor imagination and afference induces cortical plasticity , 2012, The Journal of physiology.

[23]  L. Schwirtlich,et al.  Feedback control of the forearm movement of tetraplegic patient based on Microsoft Kinect and multi-pad electrodes , 2013 .

[24]  Milos R Popovic,et al.  Short‐Term Neuroplastic Effects of Brain‐Controlled and Muscle‐Controlled Electrical Stimulation , 2015, Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society.

[25]  Janet L. Taylor,et al.  Voluntary Motor Output Is Altered by Spike-Timing-Dependent Changes in the Human Corticospinal Pathway , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  L. Cohen,et al.  Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Electrical Stimulation of the Upper Limb in Stroke: Stimulation of the Extensors of the Hand vs. Alternate Stimulation of Flexors and Extensors , 2004, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[28]  J. Knott.  The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory , 1951 .

[29]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The responsiveness of the Action Research Arm test and the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale in chronic stroke patients. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[30]  N. Yozbatiran,et al.  A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[31]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[32]  D. Reisman,et al.  Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  Ruth Dundas,et al.  Estimates of the Prevalence of Acute Stroke Impairments and Disability in a Multiethnic Population , 2001, Stroke.

[34]  Aleksandra Vuckovic,et al.  Rehabilitation of hand in subacute tetraplegic patients based on brain computer interface and functional electrical stimulation: a randomised pilot study , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[35]  J. H. van der Lee,et al.  The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  Owen Howlett,et al.  Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[37]  Maurizio Ferrarin,et al.  A Noninvasive Neuroprosthesis Augments Hand Grasp Force in Individuals with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: The Functional and Therapeutic Effects , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[38]  John Hansen,et al.  Design and Test of a Closed-Loop FES System for Supporting Function of the Hemiparetic Hand Based on Automatic Detection Using the Microsoft Kinect Sensor , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[39]  L. Miller,et al.  Brain-controlled neuromuscular stimulation to drive neural plasticity and functional recovery , 2015, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[40]  Jinyi Long,et al.  A novel cortical target to enhance hand motor output in humans with spinal cord injury , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.