A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.

PURPOSE Deformable image registration (DIR) is being used increasingly in various clinical applications. However, the underlying uncertainties of DIR are not well-understood and a comprehensive methodology has not been developed for assessing a range of interfraction anatomic changes during head and neck cancer radiotherapy. This study describes the development of a library of clinically relevant virtual phantoms for the purpose of aiding clinicians in the QA of DIR software. These phantoms will also be available to the community for the independent study and comparison of other DIR algorithms and processes. METHODS Each phantom was derived from a pair of kVCT volumetric image sets. The first images were acquired of head and neck cancer patients prior to the start-of-treatment and the second were acquired near the end-of-treatment. A research algorithm was used to autosegment and deform the start-of-treatment (SOT) images according to a biomechanical model. This algorithm allowed the user to adjust the head position, mandible position, and weight loss in the neck region of the SOT images to resemble the end-of-treatment (EOT) images. A human-guided thin-plate splines algorithm was then used to iteratively apply further deformations to the images with the objective of matching the EOT anatomy as closely as possible. The deformations from each algorithm were combined into a single deformation vector field (DVF) and a simulated end-of-treatment (SEOT) image dataset was generated from that DVF. Artificial noise was added to the SEOT images and these images, along with the original SOT images, created a virtual phantom where the underlying "ground-truth" DVF is known. Images from ten patients were deformed in this fashion to create ten clinically relevant virtual phantoms. The virtual phantoms were evaluated to identify unrealistic DVFs using the normalized cross correlation (NCC) and the determinant of the Jacobian matrix. A commercial deformation algorithm was applied to the virtual phantoms to show how they may be used to generate estimates of DIR uncertainty. RESULTS The NCC showed that the simulated phantom images had greater similarity to the actual EOT images than the images from which they were derived, supporting the clinical relevance of the synthetic deformation maps. Calculation of the Jacobian of the "ground-truth" DVFs resulted in only positive values. As an example, mean error statistics are presented for all phantoms for the brainstem, cord, mandible, left parotid, and right parotid. CONCLUSIONS It is essential that DIR algorithms be evaluated using a range of possible clinical scenarios for each treatment site. This work introduces a library of virtual phantoms intended to resemble real cases for interfraction head and neck DIR that may be used to estimate and compare the uncertainty of any DIR algorithm.

[1]  K. Brock,et al.  Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Piper,et al.  SU‐FF‐I‐68: Evaluation of An Intensity‐Based Free‐Form Deformable Registration Algorithm , 2007 .

[3]  Joe Y. Chang,et al.  Validation of an accelerated ‘demons’ algorithm for deformable image registration in radiation therapy , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Di Yan,et al.  Automatic delineation of on-line head-and-neck computed tomography images: toward on-line adaptive radiotherapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R Calandrino,et al.  An automatic contour propagation method to follow parotid gland deformation during head-and-neck cancer tomotherapy , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  Michael Velec,et al.  A novel technique to enable experimental validation of deformable dose accumulation. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  P. Lambin,et al.  Evaluation of nonrigid registration models for interfraction dose accumulation in radiotherapy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[8]  Neil Kirby,et al.  A two-dimensional deformable phantom for quantitatively verifying deformation algorithms. , 2011, Medical physics.

[9]  Neil Kirby,et al.  Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations. , 2013, Medical physics.

[10]  K. Brock Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[13]  W P Segars,et al.  Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization. , 2013, Medical physics.

[14]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  K. Brock,et al.  Demons deformable registration for CBCT-guided procedures in the head and neck: convergence and accuracy. , 2009, Medical physics.

[16]  Benoît Macq,et al.  Comparison of 12 deformable registration strategies in adaptive radiation therapy for the treatment of head and neck tumors. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  D. Yan,et al.  A model to accumulate fractionated dose in a deforming organ. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Indrin J Chetty,et al.  Analysis of deformable image registration accuracy using computational modeling. , 2010, Medical physics.

[19]  T Kron,et al.  Is it sensible to "deform" dose? 3D experimental validation of dose-warping. , 2012, Medical physics.

[20]  Lei Dong,et al.  Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer—Can an Old Goal Evolve into a New Standard? , 2010, Journal of oncology.

[21]  Jeffrey V Siebers,et al.  Estimation of three-dimensional intrinsic dosimetric uncertainties resulting from using deformable image registration for dose mapping. , 2011, Medical physics.

[22]  Quan Chen,et al.  Objective assessment of deformable image registration in radiotherapy: A multi-institution study , 2008 .

[23]  Daniel P. Huttenlocher,et al.  Comparing Images Using the Hausdorff Distance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[24]  J. Pouliot,et al.  The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration. , 2012, Medical physics.

[25]  Xavier Geets,et al.  Adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. , 2010, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[26]  W. Tomé,et al.  Variations in the contouring of organs at risk: test case from a patient with oropharyngeal cancer. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Rojano Kashani,et al.  Technical note: a physical phantom for assessment of accuracy of deformable alignment algorithms. , 2007, Medical physics.

[28]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  Mary Feng,et al.  Normal tissue anatomy for oropharyngeal cancer: contouring variability and its impact on optimization. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  Weiguo Lu,et al.  SU‐GG‐I‐113: Image Deformation Based on a Marionette Model , 2010 .

[31]  Gerald Q. Maguire,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of retrospective intermodality brain image registration techniques. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.