State strategies of governance in biomedical innovation: aligning conceptual approaches for understanding 'Rising Powers' in the global context

Background'Innovation' has become a policy focus in its own right in many states as they compete to position themselves in the emerging knowledge economies. Innovation in biomedicine is a global enterprise in which 'Rising Power' states figure prominently, and which undoubtedly will re-shape health systems and health economies globally. Scientific and technological innovation processes and policies raise difficult issues in the domains of science/technology, civil society, and the economic and healthcare marketplace. The production of knowledge in these fields is complex, uncertain, inter-disciplinary and inter-institutional, and subject to a continuing political struggle for advantage. As part of this struggle, a wide variety of issues - regulation, intellectual property, ethics, scientific boundaries, healthcare market formation - are raised and policy agendas negotiated.MethodsA range of social science disciplines and approaches have conceptualised such innovation processes. Against a background of concepts such as the competition state and the developmental state, and national innovation systems, we give an overview of a range of approaches that have potential for advancing understanding of governance of global life science and biomedical innovation, with special reference to the 'Rising Powers', in order to examine convergences and divergences between them. Conceptual approaches that we focus on include those drawn from political science/political economy, sociology of technology; Innovation Studies and Science & Technology Studies. The paper is part of a project supported by the UK ESRC's Rising Powers programme.ResultsWe show convergences and complementarities between the approaches discussed, and argue that the role of the national state itself has become relatively neglected in much of the relevant theorising.ConclusionsWe conclude that an approach is required that enables innovation and governance to be seen as 'co-producing' each other in a multi-level, global ecology of innovation, taking account of the particular, differing characteristics of different emerging scientific fields and technologies. We suggest key points to take account of in order in the future to move toward a satisfactory integrative conceptual framework, capable of better understanding the processes of the emergence, state steerage and transnational governance of innovative biomedical sectors in the Rising Powers and global context.

[1]  R. Wade What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’ , 2003 .

[2]  J. Stanley Metcalfe,et al.  Networks of knowledge: The distributed nature of medical innovation , 2007, Scientometrics.

[3]  Clare Williams,et al.  Spaces of speech and places of performance: an outline of a geography of science approach to embryonic stem cell research and diabetes , 2008 .

[4]  John Minns,et al.  Of miracles and models: The rise and decline of the developmental state in South Korea , 2001 .

[5]  James N. Rosenau,et al.  Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics , 1992 .

[6]  Bennis Wai-yip So,et al.  China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century , 2004 .

[7]  B. Salter,et al.  Regenerative medicine in Europe: global competition and innovation governance. , 2010, Regenerative medicine.

[8]  Linda Weiss,et al.  Developmental states in transition: adapting, dismantling, innovating, not ‘normalizing’ , 2000 .

[9]  Clemente Forero-Pineda,et al.  The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries , 2006 .

[10]  P. Rabinow,et al.  The changing norms of the life sciences , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Ziya Öniş Privatization and the Logic of Coalition Building , 1991 .

[12]  The Politics of flexibility : restructuring state and industry in Britain, Germany, and Scandinavia , 1991 .

[13]  Bruce G. Carruthers,et al.  The Myth of the Powerless State , 1998 .

[14]  Philip Cooke,et al.  The Evolution of Biotechnology in Three Continents: Schumpeterian or Penrosian? , 2003 .

[15]  A. Perl,et al.  Internationalized Policy Environments and Policy Network Analysis , 1999 .

[16]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories , 1993 .

[17]  Harro van Lente,et al.  Tracing emerging irreversibilities in emerging technologies: The case of nanotubes , 2005 .

[18]  Carl J. Dahlman,et al.  China and the Knowledge Economy: Seizing the 21st Century. WBI Development Studies. , 2001 .

[19]  M. Beeson American Hegemony and Regionalism: The Rise of East Asia and the End of the Asia-Pacific , 2006, Rivalry and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific.

[20]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Non-linearity and Expectations in Niche-Development Trajectories: Ups and Downs in Dutch Biogas Development (1973–2003) , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[21]  Mike Michael,et al.  Prepublication Copy of , 2009 .

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  Richard Batley,et al.  The Changing Role of Government , 2004 .

[24]  Joseph Wong The Adaptive Developmental State in East Asia , 2004, Journal of East Asian Studies.

[25]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[26]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[27]  John Metcalfe,et al.  Emergent innovation systems and the delivery of clinical services: The case of intra-ocular lenses , 2005 .

[28]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  Lock in, the state and vaccine development: Lessons from the history of the polio vaccines , 2005 .

[29]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  How Users Matter. The Co-construction of Technologies and Users , 2003 .

[30]  S. Blume,et al.  Vaccine independence, local competences and globalisation: lessons from the history of pertussis vaccines. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[31]  A. Barry Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society , 2001 .

[32]  Damian Tambini,et al.  Book review: political machines: governing a technological society, by Andrew Barry. New York: Athlone, 2001 , 2002 .

[33]  Gerard Delanty,et al.  Book Review: Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization , 2006 .

[34]  F. Malerba NEW CHALLENGES FOR SECTORAL SYSTEMS OF INNOVATION IN EUROPE , 2002 .

[35]  Davide Consoli,et al.  Knowledge, Understanding and the Dynamics of Medical Innovation , 2008 .

[36]  M. Mann,et al.  Has globalization ended the rise and rise of the nation-state? , 1997 .

[37]  G. Richards Putting science in its place: Geographies of scientific knowledge , 2005 .

[38]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[39]  S. Newell,et al.  The role of institutional differences in biomedical innovation processes: a comparison of the UK and US , 2007 .

[40]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[41]  Biotechnology regulation: Limiting or contributing to biotech development? , 2001 .

[42]  David Wield,et al.  Health Biotechnology to 2030 , 2007 .

[43]  B. Knoppers,et al.  Governing stem cell banks and registries: emerging issues. , 2009, Stem cell research.

[44]  Don E. Kash,et al.  Path Dependence in the Innovation of Complex Technologies , 2002, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[45]  R. Eisenberg,et al.  Bayh-Dole Reform and the Progress of Biomedicine , 2002, American Scientist.

[46]  P. Cerny,et al.  Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization , 1997, Government and Opposition.

[47]  Dirk Messner,et al.  The network society : economic development and international competitiveness as problems of social governance , 1997 .

[48]  Alex Faulkner,et al.  Medical Technology into Healthcare and Society: A Sociology of Devices, Innovation and Governance , 2008 .

[49]  Chad P. Bown Dancing with Giants: China, India and the Global Economy edited by L. Alan Winters and Shahid Yusuf Singapore: World Bank and the Institute for Policy Studies, 2007 , 2008, World Trade Review.

[50]  S. Jasanoff States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[51]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[52]  B. Salter,et al.  Bioethics and the Global Moral Economy , 2007 .

[53]  A. Schrank,et al.  Incubating Innovation or Cultivating Corruption?: The Developmental State and the Life Sciences in Asia , 2010 .

[54]  G. Dosi Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical Change , 1982 .

[55]  Joseph Wong Re-Making the Developmental State in Taiwan: The Challenges of Biotechnology , 2005 .

[56]  B. Salter Governing stem cell science in China and India: emerging economies and the global politics of innovation , 2008 .

[57]  B. Salter State Strategies and the Geopolitics of the Global Knowledge Economy: China, India and the Case of Regenerative Medicine , 2009 .

[58]  Arie Rip Co-Evolution of Science, Technology and Society. Expert Review for the Bundesministerium Bildung und Forschung's Forderinitiative 'Politik, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft' (Science Policy Studies) , 2002 .

[59]  D. Livingstone Putting science in its place , 2000, Nature.

[60]  Mazen Labban The Struggle for the Heartland: Hybrid Geopolitics in the Transcaspian , 2009 .

[61]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[62]  Frederic C. Deyo,et al.  The Logic of the Developmental State , 2008 .

[63]  Charlotte Salter,et al.  Governing innovation in the biomedicine knowledge economy: stem cell science in the USA , 2010 .

[64]  Yun-Tae Kim,et al.  Neoliberalism and the decline of the developmental state , 1999 .

[65]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[66]  C. Hay Re‐Stating Politics, Re‐Politicising the State: Neo‐liberalism, Economic Imperatives and the Rise of the Competition State , 2004 .

[67]  Christoph Knill,et al.  Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance , 2002 .

[68]  J. Rosenau Distant Proximities: Dynamics beyond Globalization , 2003 .

[69]  Vivek Chibber Locked in Place: State-Building and Late Industrialization in India , 2003 .

[70]  Yongping Wu Rethinking the Taiwanese Developmental State , 2004, The China Quarterly.

[71]  O. Young Governance in World Affairs , 1999 .

[72]  R. Wade Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization , 1991 .

[73]  Paul Nightingale,et al.  Technological paradigms: past, present and future , 2008 .

[74]  R. Appelbaum,et al.  States and Development in the Asian Pacific Rim , 1992, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[75]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users matter : The co-construction of users and technologies , 2003 .

[76]  G. Hodge,et al.  Accountability in the Privatized State , 2007 .

[77]  P. Cooke Regional knowledge capabilities, embeddedness of firms and industry organisation: Bioscience megacentres and economic geography , 2004 .

[78]  V. Schneider,et al.  Global Governance through Private Organizations , 1999 .

[79]  M. Haque Governance and Bureaucracy in Singapore: Contemporary Reforms and Implications , 2004 .

[80]  David Wield,et al.  OECD International Futures Project on “The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda”. Health Biotechnology to 2030 , 2007 .

[81]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[82]  B. Janssens,et al.  The promise of the East: India and China as R&D options. , 2006, Nature biotechnology.

[83]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[84]  英夫 田部井 MITI and the Japanese Miracle〔仏文〕 , 2002 .

[85]  Z. Allaoua India - Five years of stabilization and reform and the challenges ahead , 1996 .

[86]  Alex Faulkner,et al.  Regulatory policy as innovation: Constructing rules of engagement for a technological zone of tissue engineering in the European Union , 2009 .

[87]  S. L. Star,et al.  Ecologies of knowledge : work and politics in science and technology , 1996 .

[88]  A. Blaser,et al.  The Global Politics of Human Embryonic Stem Cell Science: Regenerative Medicine in Transition , 2010, Politics and the Life Sciences.

[89]  D. Josselin,et al.  Non-State Actors in World Politics , 2001 .

[90]  H. Liu,et al.  Explaining the Dynamics of the Southeast Asian Political Economy: State, Society, and the Search for Economic Growth , 1993, World Politics.

[91]  A. Barry,et al.  Technological Zones , 2006 .

[92]  Carl J. Dahlman,et al.  India and the knowledge economy: leveraging strengths and opportunities , 2005 .

[93]  Shahid Yusuf,et al.  Dancing with Giants: China, India, and the Global Economy , 2007 .

[94]  Peter M. Kogge,et al.  The state of state , 2003, The Ninth International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture, 2003. HPCA-9 2003. Proceedings..

[95]  M. Callon Europe wrestling with technology , 2004 .

[96]  S. Bartholomew National Systems of Biotechnology Innovation: Complex Interdependence in the Global System , 1997 .

[97]  S. Webb,et al.  Insight and industry: on the dynamics of technological change in medicine , 1992, Medical History.

[98]  Louis A. Picard The state of the state , 2005 .

[99]  S. Sassen The Participation of States and Citizens in Global Governance , 2003 .

[100]  Maria Markantonatou The Future of the Capitalist State , 2005 .

[101]  Philip G. Cerny,et al.  Paradoxes of the Competition State: The Dynamics of Political Globalization , 1997 .

[102]  B. Salter China, Globalisation and Health Biotechnology Innovation: Venture Capital and the Adaptive State , 2009 .

[103]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[104]  D. Mowery,et al.  The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and University–Industry Technology Transfer: A Model for Other OECD Governments? , 2004 .

[105]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[106]  C. Scott Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance , 2002 .