Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE Platinum and taxane compounds have demonstrated activity in uterine carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed Mullerian tumor). Ifosfamide plus paclitaxel is the regimen with established superiority based on a randomized phase III trial conducted through the Gynecologic Oncology Group. However, the toxicity, multiday schedule, and limited activity of this regimen support further development of novel regimens. Our primary objective was to estimate the antitumor activity and toxicity of paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with uterine carcinosarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligible patients had advanced stage (III or IV), persistent or recurrent measurable disease, and no prior chemotherapy. Patients received paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) over 3 hours plus carboplatin (area under the serum concentration-time curve = 6) IV over 30 minutes every 3 weeks until disease progression or until adverse effects occurred. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 was used to grade adverse events. RESULTS Fifty-five patients were entered onto the study with nine being excluded from analysis, leaving 46 evaluable for analysis. Treatment was well tolerated with expected hematologic toxicity and minimal nonhematologic grade 4 toxicity (one cardiovascular and two pain) with 59% of patients completing six or more cycles of chemotherapy. The proportions of patients with confirmed complete and partial responses were 13% and 41%, respectively, resulting in a total overall response rate of 54% (95% CI, 37% to 67%). CONCLUSION Paclitaxel plus carboplatin demonstrates antitumor activity against uterine carcinosarcoma with acceptable toxicity and warrants further evaluation in phase III randomized trials.

[1]  A. Tinker,et al.  Carboplatin plus paclitaxel for advanced or recurrent uterine malignant mixed mullerian tumors. The British Columbia Cancer Agency experience. , 2008, Gynecologic oncology.

[2]  A. Wolfson,et al.  A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I-IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  L. Ramondetta,et al.  A phase II multicenter trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin in women with advanced or recurrent malignant mixed mullerian tumors (MMMT) of the uterus , 2007 .

[4]  B. Monk,et al.  Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  G. Matsunaga,et al.  Clinical experience with combination paclitaxel and carboplatin therapy for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus. , 2004, Gynecologic oncology.

[6]  R. Burger,et al.  Phase II evaluation of oral trimetrexate in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2002, Gynecologic oncology.

[7]  J. Curtin,et al.  Paclitaxel in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a gynecologic oncology group study. , 2001, Gynecologic oncology.

[8]  G. Sutton,et al.  A phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without cisplatin in carcinosarcoma of the uterus: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 2000, Gynecologic oncology.

[9]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  M Van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[11]  T T Chen,et al.  Optimal flexible designs in phase II clinical trials. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  H. Ball,et al.  A phase II trial of amonafide in patients with mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1998, American journal of clinical oncology.

[13]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a clinicopathological multicenter CTF study. , 1997, Gynecologic oncology.

[14]  J. Blessing,et al.  A phase II trial of aminothiadiazole in patients with mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterine corpus : A Gynecologic Oncology Group study , 1996 .

[15]  E. Yordan,et al.  Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: A gynecologic oncology group study , 1993, Cancer.

[16]  E. Yordan,et al.  Phase II trial of cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  D. Clarke‐Pearson,et al.  A phase II trial of diaziquone (AZQ) in mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. , 1991, Investigational new drugs.

[18]  G. Sutton,et al.  Gynecologic Oncology Group experience with ifosfamide. , 1990, Seminars in oncology.

[19]  H. Muss,et al.  Mitoxantrone in the Treatment of Advanced Uterine Sarcoma: A Phase II Trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group , 1990, American journal of clinical oncology.

[20]  F. Askin,et al.  Carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mesodermal tumor) of the uterus. A Gynecologic Oncology Group pathologic study of 203 cases. , 1990, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[21]  E Wiltshaw,et al.  Carboplatin dosage: prospective evaluation of a simple formula based on renal function. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Clinicopathologic analysis of uterine malignant mixed müllerian tumors. , 1989, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  P. Disaia,et al.  Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in mixed mesodermal tumors of the uterus (a Gynecologic Oncology Group study). , 1989, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  M. Piver,et al.  Patterns of metastasis in uterine sarcoma. An autopsy study. , 1989, Cancer.

[25]  P. Disaia,et al.  Phase II trial of etoposide in the management of advanced or recurrent mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1987, Cancer treatment reports.

[26]  C. Stringer,et al.  Cisplatin therapy for disseminated mixed mesodermal sarcoma of the uterus. , 1987, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  P. Disaia,et al.  Phase II trial of cisplatin in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent mixed mesodermal sarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1986, Cancer treatment reports.

[28]  J. Thigpen,et al.  Phase II trial of piperazinedione in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study , 1985, American journal of clinical oncology.

[29]  Brown Bw,et al.  Confidence limits for probability of response in multistage phase II clinical trials. , 1985 .

[30]  C. Mangan,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. , 1985, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  P. Disaia,et al.  Treatment of recurrent or advanced uterine sarcoma. A randomized trial of doxorubicin Versus doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group) , 1985, Cancer.

[32]  E. Atkinson,et al.  Confidence limits for probability of response in multistage phase II clinical trials. , 1985, Biometrics.

[33]  Roger W. Jelliffe,et al.  Creatinine Clearance: Bedside Estimate , 1973 .