Extended High-Frequency Audiometry using the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System Compared to Manual Audiometry in Children and Adolescents

Objectives: Reliable wireless automated audiometry that includes extended high frequencies (EHF) outside a sound booth would increase access to monitoring programs for individuals at risk for hearing loss, particularly those at risk for ototoxicity. The purpose of the study was to compare thresholds obtained with 1) standard manual audiometry to automated thresholds measured with the Wireless Automated Hearing Test System (WAHTS) inside a sound booth, and 2) automated audiometry in the sound booth to automated audiometry outside the sound booth in an office environment. Design: Cross-sectional, repeated measures study. Twenty-eight typically developing children and adolescents (mean = 14.6 yrs; range = 10 to 18 yrs). Audiometric thresholds were measured from 0.25 to 16 kHz with manual audiometry in the sound booth, automated audiometry in the sound booth, and automated audiometry in a typical office environment in counterbalanced order. Ambient noise levels were measured inside the sound booth and the office environment were compared to thresholds at each test frequency. Results: Automated thresholds were overall about 5 dB better compared to manual thresholds, with greater differences in the extended high frequency range (EHF;10-16 kHz). The majority of automated thresholds measured in a quiet office were within +/- 10 dB of automated thresholds measured in a sound booth (84%), while only 56% of automated thresholds in the sound booth were within +/- 10 dB of manual thresholds. No relationship was found between automated thresholds measured in the office environment and the average or maximum ambient noise level. Conclusions: These results indicate that self-administered, automated audiometry results in slightly better thresholds overall than manually administered audiometry in children, consistent with previous studies in adults. Ambient noise levels in a typical office environment did not have an adverse effect on audiometric thresholds measured using noise attenuation headphones. Thresholds measured using an automated tablet with noise attenuating headphones could improve access to hearing assessment for children with a variety of risk factors. Additional studies of extended high frequency automated audiometry in a wider age range are needed to establish normative thresholds.

[1]  L. Picinali,et al.  Tablet and web-based audiometry to screen for hearing loss in adults with cystic fibrosis , 2020, Thorax.

[2]  Douglas S Brungart,et al.  TabSINT: open-source mobile software for distributed studies of hearing , 2019, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Eric A. Eisen,et al.  Reliability of Tablet-Based Hearing Testing in Nicaraguan Schoolchildren: A Detailed Analysis. , 2019, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[5]  Douglas Brungart,et al.  Using tablet-based technology to deliver time-efficient ototoxicity monitoring , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[6]  D. Konrad-Martin,et al.  Ototoxicity monitoring through the eyes of the treating physician: Perspectives from pulmonology and medical oncology , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[7]  M Mars,et al.  The use of telehealth services to facilitate audiological management for children: A scoping review and content analysis , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[8]  Brendan P. Flynn,et al.  Going wireless and booth-less for hearing testing in industry , 2017, International journal of audiology.

[9]  D. Polley,et al.  Validation of a Self‐Administered Audiometry Application: An Equivalence Study , 2016, The Laryngoscope.

[10]  De Wet Swanepoel,et al.  Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[11]  D. Sladen,et al.  Accuracy of a Tablet Audiometer for Measuring Behavioral Hearing Thresholds in a Clinical Population , 2015, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[12]  A. Rodríguez Valiente,et al.  Extended high-frequency (9–20 kHz) audiometry reference thresholds in 645 healthy subjects , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[13]  Jungmee Lee,et al.  Behavioral Hearing Thresholds Between 0.125 and 20 kHz Using Depth-Compensated Ear Simulator Calibration , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[14]  M. Kenna,et al.  Sensorineural hearing loss in patients with cystic fibrosis , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[15]  P. Harris,et al.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap) - A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support , 2009, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Welfare Agencies,et al.  Year 2000 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs , 2000, Pediatrics.

[17]  J. Henry,et al.  High-frequency audiometric monitoring for early detection of aminoglycoside ototoxicity. , 1992, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  J. Jerger,et al.  Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds , 1959 .

[19]  V. Preedy,et al.  Prospective Cohort Study , 2010 .

[20]  J. Henry,et al.  High-frequency testing techniques and instrumentation for early detection of ototoxicity. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.