Decoding neuronal population activity in rat somatosensory cortex: role of columnar organization.

The present study asks in what way the activity of a neuronal population responding to a sensory stimulus could be most efficiently decoded, or 'read off', by the target neurons. A simple solution to this problem has been proposed - pooling the activity of responding neurons. However, pooling can be inefficient if sensory information is encoded by the 'label' of each neuron firing a spike. We have tested the efficiency of pooling by quantifying the extent to which information about a sensory stimulus is diminished when the identity of the individual neurons is lost by pooling. Analyzing the response of small groups of neurons in rat barrel cortex to single-whisker deflection, we found that pooling neurons within the same column is efficient for representing stimulus position; it causes a loss of only 1% of the information about whether the principal whisker was stimulated, and a loss of 5-12% of the finer information about which of nine possible whiskers (the principal and its neighbors) was stimulated. Cross-column pooling led to larger information losses, in the range of 25-55%. Thus, to decode stimulus position from the discharge of barrel cortex populations, 'downstream' neurons could pool the activity arising from neurons of the same column, while maintaining the activity arising from neurons of separate columns at least partially segregated. Since such parcellation is present in some of the projections from barrel cortex, these findings suggest that columnar organization of barrel cortex serves to facilitate decoding of the location of the stimulated whisker.

[1]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (SI) of mouse cerebral cortex. The description of a cortical field composed of discrete cytoarchitectonic units. , 1970, Brain research.

[2]  T. Woolsey,et al.  The structural organization of layer IV in the somatosensory region (S I) of mouse cerebral cortex , 1970 .

[3]  R. Dykes,et al.  "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses. , 1973, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. Simons Response properties of vibrissa units in rat SI somatosensory neocortex. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M. Armstrong‐James,et al.  Spatiotemporal convergence and divergence in the rat S1 “Barrel” cortex , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[6]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[7]  R. Lin,et al.  Thalamic afferents of the rat barrel cortex: a light- and electron-microscopic study using Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin as an anterograde tracer. , 1993, Somatosensory & motor research.

[8]  Ehud Zohary,et al.  Correlated neuronal discharge rate and its implications for psychophysical performance , 1994, Nature.

[9]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Dynamics of neuronal interactions in monkey cortex in relation to behavioural events , 1995, Nature.

[10]  F. Rice Comparative Aspects of Barrel Structure and Development , 1995 .

[11]  J. Movshon,et al.  A computational analysis of the relationship between neuronal and behavioral responses to visual motion , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[12]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. , 1996, Network.

[13]  V. Mountcastle The columnar organization of the neocortex. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  D. Perrett,et al.  The `Ideal Homunculus': decoding neural population signals , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Refractoriness and Neural Precision , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  B. Wandell Computational neuroimaging of human visual cortex. , 1999, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  M E Diamond,et al.  Distribution of tactile learning and its neural basis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  E T Rolls,et al.  Correlations and the encoding of information in the nervous system , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  K. Alloway,et al.  Corticostriatal Projections from Rat Barrel Cortex Have an Anisotropic Organization that Correlates with Vibrissal Whisking Behavior , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct quantitative relationship between the functional properties of human and macaque V5 , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Diamond,et al.  Experience-dependent plasticity of rat barrel cortex: redistribution of activity across barrel-columns. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  T. Leergaard,et al.  Three-Dimensional Topography of Corticopontine Projections from Rat Barrel Cortex: Correlations with Corticostriatal Organization , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  I Segev,et al.  Untangling dendrites with quantitative models. , 2000, Science.

[24]  M. Diamond,et al.  Spatial–Temporal Distribution of Whisker-Evoked Activity in Rat Somatosensory Cortex and the Coding of Stimulus Location , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Diamond,et al.  The Role of Spike Timing in the Coding of Stimulus Location in Rat Somatosensory Cortex , 2001, Neuron.

[26]  F. Mechler,et al.  Independent and Redundant Information in Nearby Cortical Neurons , 2001, Science.

[27]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[28]  Stefano Panzeri,et al.  A Unified Approach to the Study of Temporal, Correlational, and Rate Coding , 1999, Neural Computation.

[29]  P. Latham,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells act largely as independent encoders , 2001, Nature.

[30]  M. Diamond,et al.  Population Coding of Stimulus Location in Rat Somatosensory Cortex , 2001, Neuron.