Incorporating seascape connectivity in conservation prioritisation

In conservation prioritisation, it is often implicit that representation targets for individual habitat types act as surrogates for the species that inhabit them. Yet for many commercially and ecologically important coral reef fish species, connectivity among different habitats in a seascape may be more important than any single habitat alone. Approaches to conservation prioritisation that consider seascape connectivity are thus warranted. I demonstrate an approach that can be implemented within a relatively data-poor context, using widely available conservation planning software. Based on clearly stated assumptions regarding species’ habitat usage and movement ability, this approach can be adapted to different focal species and contexts, or refined as further data become available. I first derive a seascape connectivity metric based on area-weighted proximity between juvenile and adult habitat patches, and then apply this during spatial prioritisation using the decision-support software Marxan. Using a case study from Micronesia, I present two applications: first, to inform prioritisation for a network of marine protected areas to achieve regional objectives for habitat representation; and second, to identify nursery habitat patches that are most likely to supply juveniles to adult populations on reefs within existing protected areas. Incorporating seascape connectivity in conservation prioritisation highlights areas where small marine protected areas placed on coral reefs might benefit from proximity to other habitats in the seascape, and thus be more effective. Within the context of community tenure over resources, identification of critical nursery habitats to improve the effectiveness of existing marine protected areas indicates where collaboration across community boundaries might be required. Outputs from these analyses are likely to be most useful in regions where management is highly decentralised, imposing spatial constraints on the size of individual protected areas.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  Marine reserve networks for species that move within a home range. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[2]  May T. Lim,et al.  Siting marine protected areas based on habitat quality and extent provides the greatest benefit to spatially structured metapopulations , 2016 .

[3]  S. Wilson,et al.  Climatic conditions and nursery habitat quality provide indicators of reef fish recruitment strength , 2017 .

[4]  Andy Tafileichig,et al.  MARINE RESOURCES IN YAP STATE, FSM: THE CURRENT STATUS OF CUSTOMARY AND TRADITIONAL REGULATION , 2001 .

[5]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  A method for building corridors in spatial conservation prioritization , 2014, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  P. Mumby,et al.  Mangrove Habitat Use by Juvenile Reef Fish: Meta-Analysis Reveals that Tidal Regime Matters More than Biogeographic Region , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Paul S. Maxwell,et al.  Mangrove-reef connectivity promotes the effectiveness of marine reserves across the western Pacific , 2013 .

[8]  John L. Largier,et al.  AVOIDING CURRENT OVERSIGHTS IN MARINE RESERVE DESIGN , 2003 .

[9]  S. Gaines,et al.  Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning. , 2009, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Shay O’Farrell,et al.  A Genuine Win‐Win: Resolving the “Conserve or Catch” Conflict in Marine Reserve Network Design , 2017 .

[12]  David M. Kaplan,et al.  Consequences of adult and juvenile movement for marine protected areas , 2011 .

[13]  A. Olds,et al.  Habitat connectivity improves reserve performance , 2012 .

[14]  Elizabeth A. Moffitt,et al.  The utility and limitations of size and spacing guidelines for designing marine protected area (MPA) networks , 2011 .

[15]  Paul S. Maxwell,et al.  Effective protection of fish on inshore coral reefs depends on the scale of mangrove-reef connectivity , 2015 .

[16]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Population persistence in marine reserve networks: incorporating spatial heterogeneities in larval dispersal , 2010 .

[17]  I. Nagelkerken,et al.  The seascape nursery: a novel spatial approach to identify and manage nurseries for coastal marine fauna , 2015 .

[18]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[19]  G. Russ,et al.  Predicting reef fish connectivity from biogeographic patterns and larval dispersal modelling to inform the development of marine reserve networks , 2016 .

[20]  P. Mumby Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves and coral reefs: Algorithms for the design of marine reserves at seascape scales , 2006 .

[21]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Incorporating asymmetric connectivity into spatial decision making for conservation , 2010 .

[22]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs , 2009, Coral Reefs.

[23]  Paul S. Maxwell,et al.  Incorporating Surrogate Species and Seascape Connectivity to Improve Marine Conservation Outcomes , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[24]  Simon J. Pittman,et al.  Quantifying seascape structure: extending terrestrial spatial pattern metrics to the marine realm , 2011 .

[25]  P. Mumby,et al.  Larval dispersal and movement patterns of coral reef fishes, and implications for marine reserve network design , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[26]  David R. Bellwood,et al.  Herbivores in a small world: network theory highlights vulnerability in the function of herbivory on coral reefs , 2014 .

[27]  J. White Marine reserve design theory for species with ontogenetic migration , 2015, Biology Letters.

[28]  D. Eggleston,et al.  The Identification, Conservation, and Management of Estuarine and Marine Nurseries for Fish and Invertebrates , 2001 .

[29]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrating connectivity and climate change into marine conservation planning , 2014 .

[30]  Piero Visconti,et al.  Using connectivity metrics in conservation planning – when does habitat quality matter? , 2009 .

[31]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[32]  S. Andelman,et al.  COMPARING MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF COASTAL MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[33]  Peter J Mumby,et al.  Uniting paradigms of connectivity in marine ecology. , 2016, Ecology.

[34]  C. Osenberg,et al.  Stage structure, density dependence and the efficacy of marine reserves , 2000 .

[35]  A. Adams,et al.  Nursery function of tropical back-reef systems , 2006 .

[36]  A. Olds,et al.  Ecology of Fishes on Coral Reefs: Seascape ecology of fishes on coral reefs , 2015 .

[37]  Geoff Jones,et al.  Planning Marine Reserve Networks for Both Feature Representation and Demographic Persistence Using Connectivity Patterns , 2016, PloS one.

[38]  I. Nagelkerken,et al.  True Value of Estuarine and Coastal Nurseries for Fish: Incorporating Complexity and Dynamics , 2015, Estuaries and Coasts.

[39]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization , 2009 .

[40]  R. Pressey,et al.  Incorporating ontogenetic dispersal, ecological processes and conservation zoning into reserve design , 2010 .

[41]  R. Cowen,et al.  Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. , 2009, Annual review of marine science.

[42]  M. Berumen,et al.  Linking habitat mosaics and connectivity in a coral reef seascape , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[43]  Hyperstability masks declines in bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) populations , 2016, Coral Reefs.

[44]  Justin M. Calabrese,et al.  A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics , 2004 .

[45]  Simon J. Pittman,et al.  A Landscape Ecology Approach for the Study of Ecological Connectivity Across Tropical Marine Seascapes , 2009 .

[46]  S. Pittman,et al.  Seascape ecology of coastal biogenic habitats: advances, gaps, and challenges , 2011 .

[47]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  Extending networks of protected areas to optimize connectivity and population growth rate , 2015 .

[48]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Accommodating Dynamic Oceanographic Processes and Pelagic Biodiversity in Marine Conservation Planning , 2011, PloS one.

[49]  B. Tissot,et al.  Evaluating ontogenetic patterns of habitat use by reef fish in relation to the effectiveness of marine protected areas in West Hawaii , 2012 .

[50]  Mark G. Anderson,et al.  Incorporating climate change into systematic conservation planning , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[51]  R. Weeks,et al.  Using reef fish movement to inform marine reserve design , 2017 .

[52]  R. Unsworth,et al.  Recognising the necessity for Indo‐Pacific seagrass conservation , 2010 .

[53]  P. Mumby,et al.  Effects of Marine Reserves versus Nursery Habitat Availability on Structure of Reef Fish Communities , 2012, PloS one.

[54]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[55]  R. Hobbs,et al.  A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[56]  Rod M. Connolly,et al.  Synergistic effects of reserves and connectivity on ecological resilience , 2012 .

[57]  Alan Hastings,et al.  The impact of ecosystem connectivity on coral reef resilience , 2007 .

[58]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrating multiple species connectivity and habitat quality into conservation planning for coral reefs , 2016 .

[59]  Ten things to get right for marine conservation planning in the Coral Triangle. , 2014, F1000Research.

[60]  A. Olds,et al.  Prioritising seascape connectivity in conservation using network analysis , 2017 .

[61]  Trina Leberer,et al.  The Micronesia Challenge: Assessing the Relative Contribution of Stressors on Coral Reefs to Facilitate Science-to-Management Feedback , 2015, PloS one.

[62]  Paul S. Maxwell,et al.  Quantifying the conservation value of seascape connectivity: a global synthesis , 2016 .

[63]  Characterization and evaluation of coral reefs around Yap Proper, Federated States of Micronesia , 2012, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[64]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Integrated Land-Sea Conservation Planning: The Missing Links , 2011 .