Validation of a model for assessing alliance team integration

An approach towards fostering continuous team integration practice in project alliancing is essential for stimulating breakthrough outcomes. However, until recently there was no standard or systematic approach for measuring the integration practice over the life cycle of alliance projects. This paper presents such an assessment model, the Alliance Team Integration Performance Index (ATIPI), to measure the current state of the team integration performance. With the aid of a panel of alliance experts, seven dominant key indicators (KIs) with their respective quantitative measures (QMs) and performance scales were identified for inclusion in the ATIPI. As the focus of this paper, a means of examining the validity of the model is demonstrated through the use of the face validity method with a panel of experts in the field of project alliancing. The results indicate that the proposed assessment model was found to be applicable in objectively measuring team integration performance. Based on the lessons learned from the expert's interviews, the reliability of the model could be further enhanced in order to enable owner and non-owner participants to gain an insight into the team integration performance consistently and objectively.

[1]  Anthony Walker,et al.  Project Management in Construction , 1984 .

[2]  K. Grint Problems, problems, problems: The social construction of ‘leadership’ , 2005 .

[3]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Developing a Benchmarking Model for Construction Projects in Hong Kong , 2013 .

[4]  Harri Haapasalo,et al.  The characteristics of and cornerstones for creating integrated teams , 2013 .

[5]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Development of a conceptual team integration performance index for alliance projects , 2013 .

[6]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  A fuzzy approach to developing scales for performance levels of alliance team integration assessment , 2015 .

[7]  Martin Skitmore,et al.  Developing a framework for subcontractor appraisal using a balanced scorecard , 2014 .

[8]  G. Keppel Practical research: Planning and design 2nd ed. , 1980 .

[9]  S. Thomas Ng,et al.  A fuzzy gap analysis model for evaluating the performance of engineering consultants , 2007 .

[10]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Measuring complexity for building projects: a Delphi study , 2012 .

[11]  Hedley Smyth,et al.  A Critical Review of Performance Measurement in Construction , 2012 .

[12]  Daniel E. O'Leary,et al.  VALIDATION OF EXPERT SYSTEMS- WITH APPLICATIONS TO AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING EXPERT SYSTEMS* , 1987 .

[13]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Overview of alliancing research and practice in the construction industry , 2012 .

[14]  Marianne Forman,et al.  Association of Researchers in Construction Management (ARCOM) , 2011 .

[15]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  A computerized model for measuring and benchmarking the partnering performance of construction projects , 2009 .

[16]  Eddy M. Rojas,et al.  Research Validation: Challenges and Opportunities in the Construction Domain , 2010 .

[17]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  An automated partnering monitoring system—Partnering Temperature Index , 2003 .

[18]  Suzanne Wilkinson,et al.  Establishment of Quantitative Measures for Team Integration Assessment in Alliance Projects , 2015 .

[19]  H. Voordijk,et al.  Reducing opportunistic behaviour through a project alliance , 2011 .

[20]  Li-Ren Yang,et al.  The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success , 2011 .

[21]  Albert P.C. Chan,et al.  Development of a partnering performance index (PPI) for construction projects in Hong Kong: a Delphi study , 2007 .

[22]  P. Love,et al.  Price Competitive Alliance Projects: Identification of Success Factors for Public Clients , 2010 .

[23]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  The extent of team integration within construction projects , 2006 .

[24]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .