Elevational gradients, area and tropical island diversity: an example from the palms of New Guinea

The factors causing spatial variation in species richness remain poorly known. In this study, factors affecting species richness of palms (Palmae/Arecaceae) were studied along the elevational gradient of New Guinea. Interpolated elevational ranges were calculated from a database of all known collections for 145 species in 32 genera. The amount of land area at different elevations greatly affects the species richness gradient. If assessed in equal-elevation bands species richness appears to decline monotonically, but when assessed in equal-area bands species richness shows a pronounced mid-elevation peak, due to the large proportion of lowlands in New Guinea. By randomising species ranges within the total elevational gradient for palms and accounting for area, we found the mid-elevation peak to be consistent with a mid-domain effect caused by the upper and lower limits to palm distribution. Our study illustrates the importance of accounting for area in macroecological studies of richness gradients and introduces a novel yet simple method for doing this through the use of equal-area bands. Together, the effect of area and the mid-domain effect explain the majority of variation in species richness of New Guinea palms. We support calls for the multivariate assessment of the mid-domain effect on an equal footing with other potential explanations of species richness.

[1]  C. Darwin.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life , 2019 .

[2]  Carsten Rahbek,et al.  The Mid‐Domain Effect and Species Richness Patterns:What Have We Learned So Far? , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[3]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geographic Range Size and Determinants of Avian Species Richness , 2002, Science.

[4]  J. Grytnes,et al.  Species Richness and Altitude: A Comparison between Null Models and Interpolated Plant Species Richness along the Himalayan Altitudinal Gradient, Nepal , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[5]  D. Ockwell,et al.  Continental scale patterns of biodiversity: can higher taxa accurately predict African plant distributions? , 2002 .

[6]  N. Sanders.  Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport's rule , 2002 .

[7]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Null models and spatial patterns of species richness in South American birds of prey , 2002 .

[8]  K. Gaston,et al.  Latitudinal gradients in diversity: real patterns and random models , 2001 .

[9]  C. Rahbek,et al.  Geometric constraints explain much of the species richness pattern in African birds , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Kessler.  Pteridophyte species richness in Andean forests in Bolivia , 2001, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[11]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity , 2001 .

[12]  M. Crawley,et al.  Scale dependence in plant biodiversity. , 2001, Science.

[13]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Predicting species diversity in tropical forests. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Mönkkönen,et al.  The mid-domain effect and the longitudinal dimension of continents. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[15]  R. Ohlemüller,et al.  Vascular plant species richness along latitudinal and altitudinal gradients: a contribution from New Zealand temperate rainforests , 2000 .

[16]  Colwell,et al.  The mid-domain effect: geometric constraints on the geography of species richness. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Michael Kaspari,et al.  Energy, Density, and Constraints to Species Richness: Ant Assemblages along a Productivity Gradient , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[18]  C. Kremen,et al.  A null model for species richness gradients: bounded range overlap of butterflies and other rainforest endemics in Madagascar , 1999 .

[19]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  Contrasting patterns of elevational zonation for birds and mammals in the Andes of southeastern Peru , 1998 .

[20]  S. K. Lyons,et al.  An analytical model of latitudinal gradients of species richness with an empirical test for marsupials and bats in the New World , 1998 .

[21]  S. K. Lyons,et al.  Latitudinal patterns of range size : methodological concerns and empirical evaluations for New World bats and marsupials , 1997 .

[22]  C. Rahbek.  The Relationship Among Area, Elevation, And Regional Species Richness In Neotropical Birds , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[23]  C. Rahbek.  The elevational gradient of species richness: a uniform pattern? , 1995 .

[24]  Mark V. Lomolino,et al.  Species Diversity in Space and Time. , 1996 .

[25]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  Nonbiological Gradients in Species Richness and a Spurious Rapoport Effect , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[26]  G. C. Stevens.  The Elevational Gradient in Altitudinal Range: An Extension of Rapoport's Latitudinal Rule to Altitude , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[27]  M. Rosenzweig.  Species Diversity Gradients: We Know More and Less Than We Thought , 1992 .

[28]  G. C. Stevens.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[29]  H. Wolda.  Altitude, habitat and tropical insect diversity , 1987 .

[30]  J. Lawton,et al.  Effects of altitude on the abundance and species richness of insect herbivores on bracken , 1987 .

[31]  D. W. Shimwell,et al.  Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species , 1983 .

[32]  Earl D. McCoy,et al.  The Statistics and Biology of the Species-Area Relationship , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[33]  R. Macarthur.  Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[34]  James H. Brown.  Mammals on Mountaintops: Nonequilibrium Insular Biogeography , 1971, The American Naturalist.

[35]  R. Whittaker.  Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[36]  C. B. Williams.  Area and Number of Species , 1943, Nature.

[37]  O. Arrhenius,et al.  Species and Area , 1921 .

[38]  S. M. Nor.  Elevational diversity patterns of small mammals on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia , 2001 .

[39]  E. Rickart.  Elevational diversity gradients, biogeography and the structure of montane mammal communities in the intermountain region of north America , 2001 .

[40]  L. Heaney.  Small mammal diversity along elevational gradients in the Philippines: an assessment of patterns and hypotheses , 2001 .

[41]  V. Sánchez‐Cordero.  Elevation gradients of diversity for rodents and bats in Oaxaca, Mexico , 2001 .

[42]  H. Caswell,et al.  Bathymetric species-diversity patterns and boundary constraints on vertical range distributions , 1998 .

[43]  Trevor Mudge,et al.  An Analytical Model , 1996 .

[44]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Measuring more of biodiversity: Can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? , 1994 .

[45]  Dolph Schluter,et al.  Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives. , 1993 .

[46]  M. Rosenzweig,et al.  How are diversity and productivity related , 1993 .

[47]  M. Williamson,et al.  Relationship of species number to area, distance and other variables , 1988 .

[48]  A. Wallace.  The geographical distribution of animals , 1876 .

[49]  Karl Ludwig Willdenow.  The principles of botany, and of vegetable physiology / , 1805 .