Environmental stress promotes the persistence of facultative bacterial symbionts in amoebae

Abstract Amoebae are one major group of protists that are widely found in natural and engineered environments. They are a significant threat to human health not only because many of them are pathogenic but also due to their unique role as an environmental shelter for pathogens. However, one unsolved issue in the amoeba–bacteria relationship is why so many bacteria live within amoeba hosts while they can also live independently in the environments. By using a facultative amoeba– Paraburkholderia bacteria system, this study shows that facultative bacteria have higher survival rates within amoebae under various environmental stressors. In addition, bacteria survive longer within the amoeba spore than in free living. This study demonstrates that environmental stress can promote the persistence of facultative bacterial symbionts in amoebae. Furthermore, environmental stress may potentially select and produce more amoeba‐resisting bacteria, which may increase the biosafety risk related to amoebae and their intracellular bacteria.

[1]  Zhili He,et al.  The neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid has unexpected effects on the growth and development of soil amoebae. , 2023, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  M. Horn,et al.  Defensive symbiosis against giant viruses in amoebae , 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Zhili He,et al.  Evaluation of different primers of the 18S rRNA gene to profile amoeba communities in environmental samples , 2022, Water Biology and Security.

[4]  Zhili He,et al.  Soil Amoebae Affect Iron and Chromium Reduction through Preferential Predation between Two Metal-Reducing Bacteria. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Zhili He,et al.  Symbiont-Induced Phagosome Changes Rather than Extracellular Discrimination Contribute to the Formation of Social Amoeba Farming Symbiosis , 2022, Microbiology spectrum.

[6]  Zhili He,et al.  Complex Bilateral Interactions Determine the Fate of Polystyrene Micro- and Nanoplastics and Soil Protists: Implications from a Soil Amoeba. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Longfei Shu,et al.  Efficient inactivation of intracellular bacteria in dormant amoeba spores by FeP. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[8]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Context dependence in the symbiosis between Dictyostelium discoideum and Paraburkholderia , 2022, bioRxiv.

[9]  Y. Chao,et al.  Interactions between soil protists and pollutants: An unsolved puzzle. , 2022, Journal of hazardous materials.

[10]  M. Rillig,et al.  Evolutionary bet-hedging in arbuscular mycorrhiza associating angiosperms. , 2021, The New phytologist.

[11]  P. Keeling,et al.  Bacterial and archaeal symbioses with protists , 2021, Current Biology.

[12]  Xin Yang,et al.  Both viable and inactivated amoeba spores protect their intracellular bacteria from drinking water disinfection. , 2021, Journal of hazardous materials.

[13]  D. Queller,et al.  The Ecology and Evolution of Amoeba-Bacterium Interactions , 2020, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Loss and resiliency of social amoeba symbiosis under simulated warming , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[15]  N. Kremer,et al.  Stress & Symbiosis: Heads or Tails? , 2020, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution.

[16]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Endosymbiotic adaptations in three new bacterial species associated with Dictyostelium discoideum: Paraburkholderia agricolaris sp. nov., Paraburkholderia hayleyella sp. nov., and Paraburkholderia bonniea sp. nov , 2020, PeerJ.

[17]  C. Guerra,et al.  The proportion of soil-borne pathogens increases with warming at the global scale , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[18]  M. J. Pozuelo,et al.  Presence and interaction of free-living amoebae and amoeba-resisting bacteria in water from drinking water treatment plants. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[19]  Soma Ghosh,et al.  Combinatorial selection in amoebal hosts drives the evolution of the human pathogen Legionella pneumophila , 2020, Nature Microbiology.

[20]  M. Chambers,et al.  Mycobacterium bovis uses the ESX-1 Type VII secretion system to escape predation by the soil-dwelling amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum , 2020, The ISME Journal.

[21]  Y. Bahn,et al.  Unraveling Melanin Biosynthesis and Signaling Networks in Cryptococcus neoformans , 2019, mBio.

[22]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Fitness costs and benefits vary for two facultative Burkholderia symbionts of the social amoeba, Dictyostelium discoideum , 2019, Ecology and evolution.

[23]  Ascel Samba-Louaka,et al.  Free-living amoebae and squatters in the wild: ecological and molecular features. , 2019, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[24]  M. Blokesch,et al.  Ecological implications of gene regulation by TfoX and TfoY among diverse Vibrio species , 2019, Environmental microbiology.

[25]  M. Bhattacharjee,et al.  Thermal Tolerance in Green Hydra: Identifying the Roles of Algal Endosymbionts and Hosts in a Freshwater Holobiont Under Stress , 2019, Microbial Ecology.

[26]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis between social amoebae and bacteria , 2018, eLife.

[27]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria use chemotaxis to find social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum hosts , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[28]  N. Knowlton,et al.  Climate change promotes parasitism in a coral symbiosis , 2018, The ISME Journal.

[29]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Ancient bacteria–amoeba relationships and pathogenic animal bacteria , 2017, PLoS biology.

[30]  A. Whitehead,et al.  When evolution is the solution to pollution: Key principles, and lessons from rapid repeated adaptation of killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) populations , 2017, Evolutionary applications.

[31]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Burkholderia bacteria infectiously induce the proto-farming symbiosis of Dictyostelium amoebae and food bacteria , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  F. Hammes,et al.  Drinking water microbiology--from measurement to management. , 2015, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[33]  N. Gerardo,et al.  The symbiont side of symbiosis: do microbes really benefit? , 2014, Front. Microbiol..

[34]  H. Hilbi,et al.  The natural alternative: protozoa as cellular models for Legionella infection , 2014, Cellular microbiology.

[35]  Laurent Moulin,et al.  Microbiome of free-living amoebae isolated from drinking water. , 2013, Water research.

[36]  J. Strassmann,et al.  A bacterial symbiont is converted from an inedible producer of beneficial molecules into food by a single mutation in the gacA gene , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  X. Pochon,et al.  Endosymbiotic flexibility associates with environmental sensitivity in scleractinian corals , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Nicholas J Ashbolt,et al.  Do free-living amoebae in treated drinking water systems present an emerging health risk? , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Primitive agriculture in a social amoeba , 2011, Nature.

[40]  T. Shioda,et al.  Direct correlation between genome dimerization and recombination efficiency of HIV-1. , 2010, Microbes and infection.

[41]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  Bright monomeric red fluorescent protein with an extended fluorescence lifetime , 2007, Nature Methods.

[42]  Gilbert Greub,et al.  Biodiversity of Amoebae and Amoeba-Resisting Bacteria in a Hospital Water Network , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[43]  R. Tsien,et al.  Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[44]  Nicholas J Ashbolt,et al.  The Efficacy of Heat and Chlorine Treatment against Thermotolerant Acanthamoebae and Legionellae , 2004, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases.

[45]  N. Garrec,et al.  Efficiency of water disinfectants against Legionella pneumophila and Acanthamoeba. , 2011, Water research.