A summary of the current drug interaction guidance from the European Medicines Agency and considerations of future updates.

The current EMA drug interaction guideline was published in 2012. This guideline gives important recommendations on the information required to elucidate the interaction potential of an investigational drug, both as effects of the investigational drug on the PK of other drugs and effects of other medicinal products on the PK of the investigational drug. Additional information on the use of PBPK modelling to inform drug interaction information, is also available in the guideline on the reporting of physiologically based modelling and simulation (2018). Some points of clarification on the drug interaction guideline, particularly in the area of enzyme induction screening, have been published as the EMA questions and answers (2014) and these points and further additional points, were proposed to be incorporated into a new update of the guideline, for which a concept paper was published in 2017. This update, which is still in progress, was to include new recommendations in line with relevant emerging scientific data (e.g. in the area of drug transporters). It is also intended to harmonise requirements on drug interactions with other Regulatory Agencies and this will be facilitated by the recently announced ICH initiative.

[1]  L. Benet,et al.  Changes in plasma protein binding have little clinical relevance , 2002, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[2]  Dale J. Kempf,et al.  A Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitor Is a Novel Functional Inhibitor of Human Pregnane X Receptor , 2008, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[3]  Masoud Jamei,et al.  Cytochrome p450 turnover: regulation of synthesis and degradation, methods for determining rates, and implications for the prediction of drug interactions. , 2008, Current drug metabolism.

[4]  Sharon L Ripp,et al.  Evaluation of models for predicting drug–drug interactions due to induction , 2010, Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology.

[5]  S. Cole,et al.  The Importance of the Human Mass Balance Study in Regulatory Submissions , 2019, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[6]  Alex Phipps,et al.  Comparison of Different Algorithms for Predicting Clinical Drug-Drug Interactions, Based on the Use of CYP3A4 in Vitro Data: Predictions of Compounds as Precipitants of Interaction , 2009, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[7]  D. Tweedie,et al.  Considerations from the IQ Induction Working Group in Response to Drug-Drug Interaction Guidance from Regulatory Agencies: Focus on Downregulation, CYP2C Induction, and CYP2B6 Positive Control , 2017, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[8]  Hyunyoung Jeong,et al.  GW4064, an Agonist of Farnesoid X Receptor, Represses CYP3A4 Expression in Human Hepatocytes by Inducing Small Heterodimer Partner Expression , 2015, Drug Metabolism and Disposition.

[9]  A. Mathias,et al.  Cytochrome P450 3A Induction Predicts P‐glycoprotein Induction; Part 1: Establishing Induction Relationships Using Ascending Dose Rifampin , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[10]  Donghui Cui,et al.  Drug–Drug Interaction Studies: Regulatory Guidance and An Industry Perspective , 2013, The AAPS Journal.