Can procurement affect design performance

There is an emerging view in the construction industry that better performance or better value for money can be achieved by integrating teamwork for planning, design and construction of building projects. There are though, two opposing perspectives regarding how changes in traditional design practices should occur. Advocates of sustainable construction in North America posit that it is a matter of evolving processes, moving from a sequential to an iterative approach to design, whereas the British government supports the view that a change in how projects are procured is required to transform the context that dictates relationships among the members of the team. The objective of the research is to study the influence of procurement on the performance of integrated design teams. It analyses, through case studies representing these two perspectives, the influence of procurement on the performance of integrated teams. The research is conclusive in that it is the context created by contractual relationship, and not the process set up for conducting integrated design, that most influence team efficiency. It demonstrates that traditional procurement processes reinforce socio-cognitive barriers that hinder team efficiency. It also illustrates how new procurement modes can transform the dynamics of relationships between the client and the members of the supply chain, and have a positive impact on team performance.

[1]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[2]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[3]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[4]  M. Patton Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[5]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors , 2008 .

[6]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[7]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Managing for the Future: Organizational Behavior and Processes , 1998 .

[8]  Y. Engeström,et al.  Polycontextuality and Boundary Crossing in Expert Cognition: Learning and Problem Solving in Complex Work Activities. , 1995 .

[9]  B. Nardi Studying context: a comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition , 1995 .

[10]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[11]  David Zager,et al.  Collaboration as an Activity Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[12]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[13]  Frido Smulders,et al.  Towards different communication in collaborative design , 2008 .

[14]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[15]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[16]  G. Stasser,et al.  Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. , 1987 .

[17]  F. Blackler,et al.  Managing Experts and Competing through Innovation: An Activity Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[18]  V. Druskat,et al.  The Content of Effective Teamwork Mental Models in Self-Managing Teams: Ownership, Learning and Heedful Interrelating , 2002 .

[19]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[20]  Finland,et al.  Fast or concurrent: The art of getting construction improved , 1997 .

[21]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  Intra-team boundaries as inhibitors of performance improvement in UK design and build projects: a call for change , 2001 .

[22]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .

[23]  Kaj U. Koskinen,et al.  Role of boundary objects in negotiations of project contracts , 2009 .

[24]  Sheryl Staub-French,et al.  Physical and Digital Artifact-Mediated Coordination in Building Design , 2008, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[25]  Victor Kaptelinin,et al.  Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.