Modular robotic platform for silicon micromechanical assembly.

As no reliable methods is available to manipulate component whose typical size is up to 100μm, current industrial assembled products contained only components down to this physical limit. In that scale, micro-assembly requires specific handling strategies to overcome adhesion and high precision robots. This paper deals with an original robotic system able to perform reliable micro-assembly of silicon microobjects whose sizes are tens of micrometers. Original hybrid handling strategies between gripping and adhesion handling are proposed. An experimental robotic structure composed of micropositionning stages, videomicroscopes, piezogripper, and silicon end-effectors is presented. A modular control architecture is proposed to easily design and modify the robotic structure. Some experimental teleoperated micromanipulations and micro-assemblies have validated the proposed methods and the reliability of the principles. Future works will be focused on micro-assembly automation.

[1]  Fumihito Arai,et al.  3D Manipulation of lipid nanotubes using laser trapped functional gel microbeads , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Stéphane Régnier,et al.  Autonomous micromanipulation using a new strategy of accurate release by rolling , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[3]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  Improving rotation behaviour of robotic structures for micro-assembly , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering.

[4]  Harry E. Stephanou,et al.  Micro and Meso Scale Robotic Assembly , 2004 .

[5]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  Robotic micro-assembly of microparts using a piezogripper , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[6]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  A Submerged Freeze Microgripper for Micromanipulations , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  W. Cleghorn,et al.  Microassembly of 3-D microstructures using a compliant, passive microgripper , 2004, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[8]  Heikki N. Koivo,et al.  Ambient environmental effects in micro/nano handling , 2004 .

[9]  Nicolas Chaillet,et al.  Overview of Microgrippers and Design of a Micromanipulation Station Based on a MMOC Microgripper , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Nikolai Dechev,et al.  Mechanical Fastener Designs for Use in the Microassembly of 3D Microstructures , 2004 .

[11]  Michaël Gauthier,et al.  Submerged Robotic Micromanipulation and Dielectrophoretic Micro-object Release , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision.

[12]  Reymond Clavel,et al.  A micromanipulation setup for comparative tests of microgrippers , 2006 .

[13]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Integrated microendeffector for micromanipulation , 1998 .

[14]  B. Nelson,et al.  Monolithically Fabricated Microgripper With Integrated Force Sensor for Manipulating Microobjects and Biological Cells Aligned in an Ultrasonic Field , 2007, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[15]  Cédric Clévy,et al.  Comparison between micro-objects manipulations in dry and liquid mediums , 2005, 2005 International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Joel Voldman,et al.  Dielectrophoretic traps for single-particle patterning. , 2005, Biophysical journal.