Access to Infertility Consultations “What Women Tell Us About it”?

Infertility has been considered as a serious public health problem. Nevertheless, it is still very difficult to assess the epidemiology of this individual and public health problem. On the other hand, promotion of access to infertility treatments must be treated as a priority to national and regional policies.The aim was to evaluate the perception of women concerning the barriers and access to infertility consultations.Socio cultural and economic access to infertility consultations is detached and three municipalities of the northwest of Portugal were chosen as an example of a peripheral country. A quantitative/qualitative study was done with 60 women.Three dimensions were evaluated: geographic and structural and functional access, economic access and sociocultural access. The main barriers were mainly identified in the last two dimensions. The economic access was less well evaluated by women bearing the cost of treatment (medication, and concentration of costs in a short period) which is difficult to bear.This can justify a greater involvement of the Portuguese Government, by developing policies for the reimbursement of part of the costs. Also, some changes in structural and functional access must be done with special regard to the separation of the infertility consultations from the reproductive medicine section. The setting of the teams, with a follow-up by the same team of health professionals is also needed.

[1]  W. Ombelet.  Is global access to infertility care realistic? The Walking Egg Project. , 2014, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[2]  D. F. Pedraza,et al.  Accessibility to public health services: the vision of the users of the Family Health Program in Campina Grande, state of Paraiba, Brazil , 2014 .

[3]  O. Ishihara,et al.  The impact of consumer affordability on access to assisted reproductive technologies and embryo transfer practices: an international analysis. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[4]  P. Illingworth,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in access to ART treatment and the differential impact of a policy that increased consumer costs. , 2013, Human reproduction.

[5]  G. Quinn,et al.  Infertility evaluation and treatment among women in the United States. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  L. Bardin.  L'analyse de contenu , 2013 .

[7]  W. Ombelet.  The Walking Egg Project: Universal access to infertility care – from dream to reality , 2013, Facts, views & vision in ObGyn.

[8]  M. Marmot,et al.  WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide , 2012, The Lancet.

[9]  B. Agarwal.  Female Infertility and Assisted Reproduction: Impact of Oxidative Stress-- An Update , 2012 .

[10]  Rong Zhu,et al.  A reduction in public funding for fertility treatment - an econometric analysis of access to treatment and savings to government , 2012, BMC Health Services Research.

[11]  B. Tarlatzis,et al.  Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[12]  P. Barrière,et al.  Understanding the perceptions of and emotional barriers to infertility treatment: a survey in four European countries. , 2012, Human reproduction.

[13]  S. Silva,et al.  Perspectives on access to in vitro fertilization in Portugal. , 2012, Revista de saude publica.

[14]  Rozana Mesquita Ciconelli,et al.  Conceitos de acesso à saúde , 2012 .

[15]  Suzanne Tough,et al.  Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada , 2012, Human reproduction.

[16]  Stijn Hoorens,et al.  The costs and consequences of assisted reproductive technology: an economic perspective. , 2010, Human reproduction update.

[17]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Accessibility to health care facilities in Montreal Island: an application of relative accessibility indicators from the perspective of senior and non-senior residents , 2010, International journal of health geographics.

[18]  A. Chandra,et al.  A public health focus on infertility prevention, detection, and management. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  J. Sundby.  Infertility in public health: the case of Norway , 2010, Facts, views & vision in ObGyn.

[20]  C. Lewis,et al.  Racial differences in self-reported infertility and risk factors for infertility in a cohort of black and white women: the CARDIA Women's Study. , 2008, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  W. Ombelet.  False perceptions and common misunderstandings surrounding the subject of infertility in developing countries , 2008 .

[22]  Tara M Cousineau,et al.  Psychological impact of infertility. , 2007, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[23]  R. Nachtigall.  International disparities in access to infertility services. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  S. Abbott,et al.  Systematic review of recent innovations in service provision to improve access to primary care. , 2004, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[25]  M. Gulliford,et al.  The meaning of access in health care , 2003 .

[26]  A. Al-Sabir,et al.  Client satisfaction and quality of health care in rural Bangladesh. , 2001, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[27]  R. Mieusset,et al.  Occupational heat exposure and male fertility: a review. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[28]  R. Andersen,et al.  Exploring dimensions of access to medical care. , 1983, Health services research.