Future of Biomarkers in Acute Coronary Syndromes Moving Toward a Multimarker Strategy

Clinicians have become increasingly sophisticated in their application of cardiac biomarkers in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). In the 1950s, clinical investigators first reported that proteins released from necrotic cardiac myocytes could be detected in the serum and could aid in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.1 The ensuing 40 years witnessed progressive improvement in the cardiac tissue-specificity of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis and a corresponding enhancement in the clinical sensitivity and specificity of their use for establishing the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Over the past decade, the emergence of convincing evidence for the value of cardiac troponin in guiding therapy has dramatically accelerated the integration of cardiac biomarkers into clinical decision-making for patients with ACS.2 Concurrently, advances in our understanding of the pathogenesis and consequences of acute coronary atherothrombosis have stimulated the development of new biomarkers and created the opportunity for an expanded role of multiple biomarkers, some old and others new, in the classification and individualization of treatment for ACS.3,4 The report by James et al5 in the present issue of Circulation adds substantially to the accumulating evidence that a multimarker strategy, employing a pathobiologically diverse set of biomarkers,3 is likely to add importantly to cardiac-specific troponin alone in the risk assessment of patients with ACS. See p 275 ACS is a complex syndrome with multiple causes, analogous to anemia or hypertension.6 As such, treatment is likely to be most effective when directed at the underlying cause of the disease. Five principal causes of ACS have been described; these include (1) plaque rupture with acute thrombosis, (2) progressive mechanical obstruction, (3) inflammation, (4) secondary unstable angina, and (5) dynamic obstruction (coronary vasoconstriction).7 It is rare that any of these contributors exists in isolation. However, patients with ACS may …

[1]  E. Antman,et al.  C-Reactive Protein Is a Potent Predictor of Mortality Independently of and in Combination With Troponin T in Acute Coronary Syndromes: A TIMI 11A Substudy , 1998 .

[2]  Alan S Maisel,et al.  Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Califf,et al.  N‐Terminal Pro‐Brain Natriuretic Peptide and Other Risk Markers for the Separate Prediction of Mortality and Subsequent Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Unstable Coronary Artery Disease: A Global Utilization of Strategies To Open occluded arteries (GUSTO)‐IV Substudy , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  D. Morrow Troponins in patients with acute coronary syndromes: biologic, diagnostic, and therapeutic implications. , 2001, Cardiovascular toxicology.

[5]  Nader Rifai,et al.  Multimarker Approach to Risk Stratification in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: Simultaneous Assessment of Troponin I, C-Reactive Protein, and B-Type Natriuretic Peptide , 2002, Circulation.

[6]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina: an etiologic approach to management. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  C. Frampton,et al.  Plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and adrenomedullin: new neurohormonal predictors of left ventricular function and prognosis after myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[8]  M. Sabatine,et al.  Evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide for risk assessment in unstable angina/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: B-type natriuretic peptide and prognosis in TACTICS-TIMI 18. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  M. Sabatine,et al.  The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  D. Morrow,et al.  Brain Natriuretic Peptide Measurement in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Ready for Clinical Application? , 2002, Circulation.

[11]  E. Antman,et al.  Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-atrial and pro-brain natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  B. Lindahl,et al.  N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide on admission for early risk stratification of patients with chest pain and no ST-segment elevation. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  C. Cannon,et al.  Elevations in Troponin T and I Are Associated With Abnormal Tissue Level Perfusion: A TACTICS-TIMI 18 Substudy , 2002, Circulation.

[14]  François Mach,et al.  Inflammation and Atherosclerosis , 2004, Herz.

[15]  James T. Willerson,et al.  Direct Proinflammatory Effect of C-Reactive Protein on Human Endothelial Cells , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  R. Luke Chronic renal failure--a vasculopathic state. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Acute Myocardial Infarction and Renal Dysfunction: A High-Risk Combination , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[18]  R. Califf,et al.  Prognostic Implications of Abnormalities in Renal Function in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes , 2002, Circulation.

[19]  M. Mcclellan,et al.  Association of Renal Insufficiency with Treatment and Outcomes after Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[20]  E. Antman,et al.  C-reactive protein is a potent predictor of mortality independently of and in combination with troponin T in acute coronary syndromes: a TIMI 11A substudy. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  A. Siegbahn,et al.  Markers of myocardial damage and inflammation in relation to long-term mortality in unstable coronary artery disease. FRISC Study Group. Fragmin during Instability in Coronary Artery Disease. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Effects of renal insufficiency on early invasive management in patients with acute coronary syndromes (The TACTICS-TIMI 18 Trial). , 2002, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  D. Morrow,et al.  The prognostic value of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with acute coronary syndromes☆ , 2002 .

[24]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Need to test the arterial inflammation hypothesis. , 2002, Circulation.

[25]  A. Karmen,et al.  Transaminase activity in human blood. , 1955, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[26]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Unstable angina. A classification. , 1989, Circulation.