Methodologies for requirement checking on building models

The use of Building Information Modelling (BIM) has increased in the Architectural and Urban domain. Stakeholders within distinct disciplines collaborate and exchange such information models digitally. In order to strive for an interoperable use of the models, requirement documents are being written by stakeholders, standardisation bodies and governments. Such documents pose additional requirements to the exchange of building model definitions and limit the scope of information to something that is relevant to the disciplines the exchange pertains to, the phase of the construction project and the level of development of the project. For effective collaboration processes, checking these requirements in an automated and unambiguous way is of crucial importance. Yet, requirement definitions often comprise natural language texts and academic and commercial tools being developed in this regard are fragmented and heterogeneous. Furthermore, the models being checked are of uncertain quality because the semantics of the schema are not rigorously formalized and enforced and models contain redundancies that affect their reliability. This paper urges for more developed schema semantics and illustrates how the body of technical means, such as classification system, concept libraries, query languages, reasoners and model view definitions are related to one another and to the concept of automated rule checking.

[1]  Pieter Pauwels,et al.  Coping with lists in the ifcOWL ontology , 2015 .

[2]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Automatic rule-based checking of building designs , 2009 .

[3]  Jakob Beetz,et al.  BIMQL - An open query language for building information models , 2013, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[4]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Classification of rules for automated BIM rule checking development , 2015 .

[5]  Arto Kiviniemi,et al.  Future perspectives on product data management in building information modeling , 2014 .

[6]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Toward robust and quantifiable automated IFC quality validation , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[7]  A. T. Story A building with a future. , 2021, Canadian hospital.

[8]  Walter Terkaj,et al.  Ontology-based Representation of IFC EXPRESS rules: an enhancement of the ifcOWL ontology , 2015 .

[9]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[10]  Simone Paolo Ponzetto,et al.  BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network , 2012, Artif. Intell..

[11]  Robert Amor,et al.  Analysis of the Evolving IFC Schema , 2015 .

[12]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  An ontology-based approach for developing data exchange requirements and model views of building information modeling , 2016, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[13]  Pieter Pauwels,et al.  EXPRESS to OWL for construction industry: Towards a recommendable and usable ifcOWL ontology , 2016 .