Conservation of a pH-sensitive structure in the C-terminal region of spider silk extends across the entire silk gene family

Spiders produce multiple silks with different physical properties that allow them to occupy a diverse range of ecological niches, including the underwater environment. Despite this functional diversity, past molecular analyses show a high degree of amino acid sequence similarity between C-terminal regions of silk genes that appear to be independent of the physical properties of the resulting silks; instead, this domain is crucial to the formation of silk fibers. Here, we present an analysis of the C-terminal domain of all known types of spider silk and include silk sequences from the spider Argyroneta aquatica, which spins the majority of its silk underwater. Our work indicates that spiders have retained a highly conserved mechanism of silk assembly, despite the extraordinary diversification of species, silk types and applications of silk over 350 million years. Sequence analysis of the silk C-terminal domain across the entire gene family shows the conservation of two uncommon amino acids that are implicated in the formation of a salt bridge, a functional bond essential to protein assembly. This conservation extends to the novel sequences isolated from A. aquatica. This finding is relevant to research regarding the artificial synthesis of spider silk, suggesting that synthesis of all silk types will be possible using a single process.

[1]  Anna Rising,et al.  Toward spinning artificial spider silk. , 2015, Nature chemical biology.

[2]  T. Blackledge,et al.  Physicochemical Property Variation in Spider Silk: Ecology, Evolution, and Synthetic Production. , 2017, Annual review of entomology.

[3]  Anna Rising,et al.  Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[4]  Rodrigo Lopez,et al.  Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0 , 2007, Bioinform..

[5]  N. Ayoub,et al.  Untangling spider silk evolution with spidroin terminal domains , 2010, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[6]  David N. Nicholson,et al.  The Nephila clavipes genome highlights the diversity of spider silk genes and their complex expression , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[7]  S. Goodacre,et al.  Evolution of spider silks: conservation and diversification of the C‐terminus , 2006, Insect molecular biology.

[8]  M B Hinman,et al.  Synthetic spider silk: a modular fiber. , 2000, Trends in biotechnology.

[9]  Koichiro Tamura,et al.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0. , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  E. Bongcam-Rudloff,et al.  Major ampullate spidroins from Euprosthenops australis: multiplicity at protein, mRNA and gene levels , 2007, Insect molecular biology.

[11]  F. Grosse,et al.  The conserved C-termini contribute to the properties of spider silk fibroins. , 2005, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  Fritz Vollrath,et al.  Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk , 2001, Nature.

[13]  Thomas Scheibel,et al.  A conserved spider silk domain acts as a molecular switch that controls fibre assembly , 2010, Nature.

[14]  S. Goodacre,et al.  Antibiotic Spider Silk: Site‐Specific Functionalization of Recombinant Spider Silk Using “Click” Chemistry , 2017, Advanced materials.

[15]  M. Taborsky,et al.  MATE CHOICE AND SEXUAL CONFLICT IN THE SIZE DIMORPHIC WATER SPIDER ARGYRONETA AQUATICA (ARANEAE, ARGYRONETIDAE) , 2005 .

[16]  Colin N. Dewey,et al.  De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Jun Wang,et al.  Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk , 2014, Nature Communications.

[18]  R. Lewis,et al.  Evidence from flagelliform silk cDNA for the structural basis of elasticity and modular nature of spider silks. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  R. Lewis,et al.  Hypotheses that correlate the sequence, structure, and mechanical properties of spider silk proteins. , 1999, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[20]  G. Plaza,et al.  Biomimetic spinning of artificial spider silk from a chimeric minispidroin. , 2017, Nature chemical biology.

[21]  Michael Ott,et al.  De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-Seq: reference generation and analysis with Trinity , 2013 .

[22]  Anna Rising,et al.  N-terminal nonrepetitive domain common to dragline, flagelliform, and cylindriform spider silk proteins. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[23]  Shane S. Sturrock,et al.  Geneious Basic: An integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data , 2012, Bioinform..

[24]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Sexual Selection in the Water Spider: Female Choice and Male-Male Competition , 2011 .

[25]  S. Wong,et al.  Supercontraction forces in spider dragline silk depend on hydration rate. , 2009, Zoology.

[26]  R. Seymour,et al.  The diving bell and the spider: the physical gill of Argyroneta aquatica , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[27]  J. Johansson,et al.  Carbonic Anhydrase Generates CO2 and H+ That Drive Spider Silk Formation Via Opposite Effects on the Terminal Domains , 2014, PLoS biology.

[28]  R. Beckwitt,et al.  Sequence conservation in the C-terminal region of spider silk proteins (Spidroin) from Nephila clavipes (Tetragnathidae) and Araneus bicentenarius (Araneidae). , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[29]  M. Taborsky,et al.  Adaptations to an aquatic life may be responsible for the reversed sexual size dimorphism in the water spider, Argyroneta aquatica , 2003 .

[30]  G. Hormiga,et al.  Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of orb-weaving spiders. , 2014, Annual review of entomology.

[31]  N. Ayoub,et al.  Evidence from Multiple Species that Spider Silk Glue Component ASG2 is a Spidroin , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[32]  T. Blackledge,et al.  Evolution of supercontraction in spider silk: structure–function relationship from tarantulas to orb-weavers , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[33]  Y. Hsia,et al.  Conserved C-terminal domain of spider tubuliform spidroin 1 contributes to extensibility in synthetic fibers. , 2012, Biomacromolecules.

[34]  R. Lewis,et al.  Analysis of the conserved N-terminal domains in major ampullate spider silk proteins. , 2005, Biomacromolecules.

[35]  Andrew M. Smith,et al.  Decoding the secrets of spider silk , 2011 .

[36]  Air bells of water spiders are an extended phenotype modified in response to gas composition. , 2007, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[37]  F. Grosse,et al.  Conserved C-termini of Spidroins are secreted by the major ampullate glands and retained in the silk thread. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[38]  G. Plaza,et al.  Supercontraction of dragline silk spun by lynx spiders (Oxyopidae). , 2010, International journal of biological macromolecules.

[39]  J. Coddington Phylogeny and Classification of Spiders , 2005 .

[40]  N. Ayoub,et al.  Evolutionary shifts in gene expression decoupled from gene duplication across functionally distinct spider silk glands , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[41]  Ingi Agnarsson,et al.  How super is supercontraction? Persistent versus cyclic responses to humidity in spider dragline silk , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  Alexey Drozdetskiy,et al.  JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  A. Goldblum,et al.  A model for the structure of the C-terminal domain of dragline spider silk and the role of its conserved cysteine. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[44]  N. Friedman,et al.  Trinity: reconstructing a full-length transcriptome without a genome from RNA-Seq data , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[45]  D. Cohn,et al.  An essential role for the C-terminal domain of a dragline spider silk protein in directing fiber formation. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.

[46]  Thomas H. Clarke,et al.  Spider Transcriptomes Identify Ancient Large-Scale Gene Duplication Event Potentially Important in Silk Gland Evolution , 2015, Genome biology and evolution.

[47]  Todd A Blackledge,et al.  Silken toolkits: biomechanics of silk fibers spun by the orb web spider Argiope argentata (Fabricius 1775) , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[48]  Anna Rising,et al.  Self-assembly of spider silk proteins is controlled by a pH-sensitive relay , 2010, Nature.