Prioritisation of conservation areas in the Western Ghats, India

Areas of high conservation value were identified in the Western Ghats using a systematic conservation planning approach. Surrogates were chosen and assessed for effectiveness on the basis of spatial congruence using Pearson’s correlations and Mantel’s tests. The surrogates were, threatened and endemic plant and vertebrate species, unfragmented forest areas, dry forests, sub-regionally rare vegetation types, and a remotely sensed surrogate for unique evergreen ecosystems. At the scale of this analysis, amphibian richness was most highly correlated with overall threatened and endemic species richness, whereas mammals, especially wide-ranging species, were better at capturing overall animal and habitat diversity. There was a significant relationship between a remote sensing based habitat surrogate and endemic tree diversity and composition. None of the taxa or habitats served as a complete surrogate for the others. Sites were prioritised on the basis of their irreplaceability value using all five surrogates. Two alternative reserve networks are presented, one with minimal representation of surrogates, and the second with 3 occurrences of each species and 25% of each habitat type. These networks cover 8% and 29% of the region respectively. Seventy percent of the completely irreplaceable sites are outside the current protected area network. While the existing protected area network meets the minimal representation target for 88% of the species chosen in this study and all of the habitat surrogates, it is not representative with regard to amphibians, endemic tree species and small mammals. Much of the prioritised unprotected area is under reserve forests and can thus be incorporated into a wider network of conservation areas.

[1]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity , 2004, Nature.

[2]  Andrew Balmford,et al.  Complementarity and the use of indicator groups for reserve selection in Uganda , 1998, Nature.

[3]  B. R. Ramesh,et al.  Atlas of endemics of the Western Ghats (India): distribution of tree species in the evergreen and semi-evergreen forests , 1997 .

[4]  W. Darwall,et al.  Key Biodiversity Areas as Site Conservation Targets , 2004 .

[5]  M. Gadgil,et al.  Assigning conservation value: a case study from India , 1991 .

[6]  M. Norman Biodiversity Hotspots Revisited , 2003 .

[7]  D. Rj Geographical Distribution Patterns of Amphibians in the Western Ghats, India , 1992 .

[8]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimality in reserve selection algorithms: When does it matter and how much? , 1996 .

[9]  Vassiliki Kati,et al.  Testing the Value of Six Taxonomic Groups as Biodiversity Indicators at a Local Scale , 2004 .

[10]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches , 1989 .

[11]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job , 2004 .

[12]  L. Qiang Biodiversity Assessment and Conservation Strategies for Wild Orchid Plants in Xishuangbanna National Nature Reserve , 2008 .

[13]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Persistence and vulnerability: Retaining biodiversity in the landscape and in protected areas , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[14]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Global Gap Analysis: Priority Regions for Expanding the Global Protected-Area Network , 2004 .

[15]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinement , 2000 .

[16]  Nobuyuki Tsuji,et al.  Three new algorithms to calculate the irreplaceability index for presence/absence data , 2004 .

[17]  Belinda Reyers,et al.  Incorporating anthropogenic threats into evaluations of regional biodiversity and prioritisation of conservation areas in the Limpopo Province, South Africa , 2004 .

[18]  P. Raven,et al.  Biodiversity: Extinction by numbers , 2000, Nature.

[19]  R L Pressey,et al.  Beyond opportunism: Key principles for systematic reserve selection. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  W. A. Rodgers,et al.  Wildlife protected area network in India : a review. Executive summary , 2000 .

[21]  T. W. Barrett,et al.  Species distributions, surrogacy, and important conservation regions in Canada , 2004 .

[22]  S. Sarkar,et al.  Systematic conservation planning , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Maria Beger,et al.  Conservation of coral reef biodiversity: A comparison of reserve selection procedures for corals and fishes , 2003 .

[24]  Lee Belbin,et al.  Environmental representativeness: Regional partitioning and reserve selection , 1993 .

[25]  Kamaljit S. Bawa,et al.  A Vegetation Based Approach to Biodiversity Gap Analysis in the Agastyamalai Region, Western Ghats, India , 1997 .

[26]  A. Stattersfield,et al.  Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation , 1998 .

[27]  R. L. Pressey,et al.  Representing biodiversity: Data and procedures for identifying priority areas for conservation , 2002, Journal of Biosciences.

[28]  Ajith T. T. Kumar,et al.  The occurrence of arboreal mammals in the rain forest fragments in the Anamalai Hills, south India , 2000 .

[29]  James Justus,et al.  Effectiveness of Environmental Surrogates for the Selection of Conservation Area Networks , 2005 .

[30]  Simon Ferrier,et al.  Using abiotic data for conservation assessments over extensive regions : quantitative methods applied across New South Wales, Australia , 2000 .

[31]  T. Brooks,et al.  Habitat Loss and Extinction in the Hotspots of Biodiversity , 2002 .

[32]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[33]  G. Shahabuddin Preliminary observations on the role of coffee plantations as avifaunal refuges in the Palni Hills of the Western Ghats , 1997 .

[34]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Large scale patterns of biodiversity: spatial variation in family richness , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  Sarah C. Goslee,et al.  Extending community ecology to landscapes , 2002 .

[36]  V. Nijman,et al.  Primate Hotspots on Borneo: Predictive Value for General Biodiversity and the Effects of Taxonomy , 2003 .

[37]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice , 1991 .

[38]  N. Mantel The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.

[39]  Jean-Michel Roberge,et al.  Usefulness of the Umbrella Species Concept as a Conservation Tool , 2004 .

[40]  M. C. Kiran,et al.  Tree model based eco-climatic vegetation classification and fuzzy mapping in diverse tropical deciduous ecosystems using multi-season NDVI , 2004 .

[41]  R. Sukumar Ecology of the Asian elephant in southern India. I. Movement and habitat utilization patterns , 1989, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[42]  Joanna Grand,et al.  A Multiscale Landscape Approach to Predicting Bird and Moth Rarity Hotspots in a Threatened Pitch Pine–Scrub Oak Community , 2004 .

[43]  M Cabeza,et al.  Design of reserve networks and the persistence of biodiversity. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[44]  Ana S. L. Rodrigues,et al.  Species, Data, and Conservation Planning , 2004 .

[45]  K. Karanth Status of wildlife and habitat conservation in Karnataka , 1994 .

[46]  D. White,et al.  Rare Species and the Use of Indicator Groups for Conservation Planning , 2003 .

[47]  K. Karanth Conservation prospects for lion‐tailed macaques in Karnataka, India , 1992 .

[48]  W. Rodgers,et al.  Planning a wildlife protected area network in India , 1988 .

[49]  Robert L. Pressey,et al.  Formulating conservation targets for biodiversity pattern and process in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa , 2003 .

[50]  M. Z. Islam,et al.  Important Bird Areas in India: Priority Sites for Conservation , 2005 .

[51]  T. Brooks,et al.  Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions , 2000 .

[52]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[53]  D. Olson,et al.  The Global 200: A Representation Approach to Conserving the Earth’s Most Biologically Valuable Ecoregions , 1998 .

[54]  Peter Jackson,et al.  Riding the tiger : tiger conservation in human-dominated landscapes , 1999 .

[55]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  How large do reserve networks need to be , 2001 .