A cross-dependence based ranking system for efficient and inefficient units in DEA

Decision making units (DMUs) can be ranked using data envelopment analysis (DEA) technologies. This paper develops a new ranking system under the condition of variable returns to scale (VRS) based on a measure of cross-dependence efficiency (MCDE), where the evaluation for an efficient DMU is dependent of the efficiency changes of all inefficient units due to its absence in the reference set, while the appraisal of inefficient DMUs depends on the influence of the exclusion of each efficient unit from the reference set. The infeasibility problem that arises from the conventional super-efficiency models is eliminated. A new approach to ranking inefficient units is embedded in the proposed ranking system. Through an example, advantages of our proposal are demonstrated. A real application illustrates the effectiveness of the cross-dependence based ranking system.

[1]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of DEA models for simultaneous changes in all the data , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[2]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[3]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  INFEASIBILITY OF SUPER EFFICIENCY DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS MODELS , 1999 .

[4]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA sensitivity analysis by changing a reference set: regional contribution to Japanese industrial development , 1999 .

[5]  F. Hosseinzadeh Lotfi,et al.  A new DEA ranking system based on changing the reference set , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  A. Charnes,et al.  A structure for classifying and characterizing efficiency and inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1991 .

[7]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Measures of inefficiency in data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier estimation , 1997 .

[8]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A benchmark approach for baseball evaluation , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Stability regions for maintaining efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo,et al.  A Complete Efficiency Ranking of Decision Making Units in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1999, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[12]  William W. Cooper,et al.  MODELS AND MEASURES FOR EFFICIENCY DOMINANCE IN DEA Part I: Additive Models and MED Measures * , 1996 .

[13]  Yao Chen,et al.  Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[15]  Joe Zhu Robustness of the efficient DMUs in data envelopment analysis , 1996 .

[16]  Robert M. Thrall,et al.  Chapter 5 Duality, classification and slacks in DEA , 1996, Ann. Oper. Res..

[17]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[20]  Shanling Li,et al.  A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 2007, Appl. Math. Comput..