Patents as a measure for eco-innovation

This paper examines the usefulness of patent analysis for measuring eco-innovation. The overall conclusion is that patents are a useful means for measuring environmentally motivated innovations, such as pollution control technologies and green energy technologies, and for general purpose technologies with environmental benefits. For these types of innovations it is acceptable to use patent analysis, provided they are carefully screened. Patent analysis may be used for measuring five attributes of eco-innovation: (1) eco-inventive activities in specific technology fields, (2) international technological diffusion, (3) research and technical capabilities of companies, (4) institutional knowledge sources of eco-innovation, and (5) technological spillovers and knowledge flows. Up until now it is mainly used for measuring eco-inventive activity.

[1]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Mapping Technological Trajectories as Patent citation Networks: a Study on the History of Fuel Cell Research , 2007, Adv. Complex Syst..

[2]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[3]  Yves Jégourel,et al.  Les fonds souverains : un nouveau mode de régulation du capitalisme financier ? , 2009 .

[4]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Environmental innovation and industrial dynamics: the contributions of evolutionary economics , 2008 .

[5]  David Popp,et al.  International Innovation and Diffusion of Air Pollution Control Technologies: The Effects of Nox and So2 Regulation in the Us, Japan, and Germany , 2004 .

[6]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD , 1995 .

[7]  David Popp,et al.  Lessons from Patents: Using Patents to Measure Technological Change in Environmental Models , 2003 .

[8]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study , 1996, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  The Incredible Shrinking Energy R&D Budget , 2007 .

[10]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  Inter-industry technology flows in the United States , 1993 .

[11]  Daniel K. N. Johnson The OECD Technology Concordance (OTC): Patents by Industry of Manufacture and Sector of Use , 2002 .

[12]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers estimates from the European and US patent office databases , 1997 .

[13]  Eric Rougier,et al.  The law of growth and attraction: an endogenous model of absorptive capacities, FDI and income for MENA countries , 2008 .

[14]  Maïder Saint Jean,et al.  Sectoral systems of environmental innovation: An application to the French automotive industry , 2009 .

[15]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[16]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Evidence from Patents and Patent Citations on the Impact of Nasa and Other Federal Labs on Commercial Innovation , 1997 .

[17]  Matthieu Montalban,et al.  L'influence de la financiarisation sur les modèles productifs dans l'industrie pharmaceutique: domination et contradictions de la conception du contrôle blockbuster , 2009 .

[18]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Modelling trends and volatility in ecological patents in the USA , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Measuring eco-innovation , 2009 .

[20]  Jonathan Eaton,et al.  International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement , 1999 .

[21]  F. Malerba,et al.  Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification , 2003 .

[22]  Margaret R. Taylor,et al.  Effect of government actions on technological innovation for SO2 control. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  K. Rennings Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[24]  Vanessa Oltra,et al.  Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs) : a patent data analysis. , 2006 .

[25]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  The Non-Trivial Choice between Innovation Indicators , 2002 .

[26]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[27]  M. Albert,et al.  Adoption of green chemistry: an analysis based on US patents , 2004 .

[28]  Eric Berr,et al.  Le développement soutenable dans une perspective post-keynésienne : retour aux sources de l’écodéveloppement , 2009, Économie appliquée.

[29]  Daniel K. N. Johnson,et al.  Forced Out of the Closet: The Impact of the American Inventors Protection Act on the Timing of Patent Disclosure , 2001 .

[30]  Yannick Lung,et al.  The European Socio-Economic Models of a Knowledge-based society: ESEMK WP1 deliverable D1 , 2005 .

[31]  David Popp,et al.  Induced Innovation and Energy Prices , 2001 .

[32]  L. Ross,et al.  Environmental policy in China , 1988 .

[33]  Michael McAleer,et al.  Environmental Technology Strengths: International Rankings Based on US Patent Data , 2003 .

[34]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[35]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[36]  Cees Withagen,et al.  Innovation and Environmental Stringency: The Case of Sulfur Dioxide Abatement , 2005 .

[37]  Patrick Moyes,et al.  Social Welfare, Inequality and Deprivation * , 2008 .

[38]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  Mesurer le rendement de l'innovation , 2000 .

[39]  Thijs Dekker,et al.  Inciting Protocols - How International Environmental Agreements Trigger Knowledge Transfers , 2009 .

[40]  Jean O. Lanjouw,et al.  How to Count Patents and Value Intellectual Property: Uses of Patent Renewal and Application Data , 1996 .

[41]  Adam B. Jaffe,et al.  Characterizing the “technological position” of firms, with application to quantifying technological opportunity and research spillovers☆ , 1989 .

[42]  Ariel Pakes,et al.  Estimates of the Value of Patent Rights in European Countries During Thepost-1950 Period , 1985 .

[43]  Peter James,et al.  Driving Eco-Innovation: A Breakthrough Discipline for Innovation and Sustainability , 1996 .

[44]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy , 2002 .

[45]  Guizhen He,et al.  Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China , 2008 .

[46]  Eric Rougier,et al.  Recent exports matter: export discoveries, FDI and Growth, an empirical assessment for MENA countries , 2008 .

[47]  M. Frondel,et al.  End-of-Pipe or Cleaner Production? An Empirical Comparison of Environmental Innovation Decisions Across OECD Countries , 2007 .

[48]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  R&D portfolios in environmentally friendly automotive propulsion: Variety, competition and policy implications , 2004 .

[49]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Survey indicators for environmental innovation , 1998 .

[50]  M. McAleer,et al.  Nanotechnology strength indicators: international rankings based on US patents , 2003 .

[51]  E. Brouwer,et al.  Innovatieve output and a firm's propensity to patent. An empirical investigation , 1996 .

[52]  David Popp,et al.  Policy vs. Consumer Pressure: Innovation and Diffusion of Alternative Bleaching Technologies in the Pulp Industry , 2007 .

[53]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[54]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Competing technologies and the struggle towards a new dominant design: the emergence of the hybrid vehicle at the expense of the Fuel Cell Vehicle? , 2006 .

[55]  A. Jaffe Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[56]  E. C. Engelsman,et al.  A patent-based cartography of technology , 1994 .