Reliability of recording uterine cancer in death certification in France and age-specific proportions of deaths from cervix and corpus uteri.

French uterine cancer recordings in death certificates include 60% of "uterine cancer, Not Otherwise Specified (NOS)"; this hampers the estimation of mortalities from cervix and corpus uteri cancers. The aims of this work were to study the reliability of uterine cancer recordings in death certificates using a case matching with cancer registries and estimate age-specific proportions of deaths from cervix and corpus uteri cancers among all uterine cancer deaths by a statistical approach that uses incidence and survival data. Deaths from uterine cancer between 1989 and 2001 were extracted from the French National database of causes of death and case-to-case matched to women diagnosed with uterine cancer between 1989 and 1997 in 8 cancer registries. Registry data were considered as "gold-standard". Among the 1825 matched deaths, cancer registries recorded 830 cervix and 995 corpus uteri cancers. In death certificates, 5% and 40% of "true" cervix cancers were respectively coded "corpus" and "uterus, NOS" and 5% and 59% of "true" corpus cancers respectively coded "cervix" and "uterus, NOS". Miscoding cervix cancers was more frequent at advanced ages at death and in deaths at home or in small urban areas. Miscoding corpus cancers was more frequent in deaths at home or in small urban areas. From the statistical method, the estimated proportion of deaths from cervix cancer among all uterine cancer deaths was higher than 95% in women aged 30-40 years old but declined to 35% in women older than 70 years. The study clarifies the reason for poor encoding of uterus cancer mortality and refines the estimation of mortalities from cervix and corpus uteri cancers allowing future studies on the efficacy of cervical cancer screening.

[1]  G Pavillon,et al.  Improvement of the quality and comparability of causes-of-death statistics inside the European Community. EUROSTAT Task Force on "causes of death statistics". , 1998, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[2]  S. Rosso,et al.  A method to estimate mortality trends when death certificates are imprecisely coded: An application to cervical cancer in Italy , 2009, International journal of cancer.

[3]  J. Antunes,et al.  The effect of performing corrections on reported uterine cancer mortality data in the city of São Paulo. , 2006, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas.

[4]  J. Estève,et al.  Cancer in the European Community and its member states. , 1990, European journal of cancer.

[5]  H. Geys,et al.  Trend of cervical cancer mortality in Belgium (1954–1994): Tentative solution for the certification problem of unspecified uterine cancer , 2002, International journal of cancer.

[6]  D M Parkin,et al.  Sheep and goats: separating cervix and corpus uteri from imprecisely coded uterine cancer deaths, for studies of geographical and temporal variations in mortality. , 2004, European journal of cancer.

[7]  Hai-rim Shin,et al.  Trends in cervical cancer mortality in korea 1993–2002: Corrected mortality using national death certification data and national cancer incidence data , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[8]  C. la Vecchia,et al.  Cervical cancer mortality in young women in Europe: patterns and trends. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[9]  Aubenque [Causes-of-death statistics]. , 1953, Concours medical.

[10]  F. Bray,et al.  Geographic and temporal variations in cancer of the corpus uteri: Incidence and mortality in pre‐ and postmenopausal women in Europe , 2005, International journal of cancer.

[11]  G. Hédelin,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1978-2000. , 2003, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[12]  M. Žakelj,et al.  Can we rely on cancer mortality data? Checking the validity of cervical cancer mortality data for Slovenia , 2001 .

[13]  M Colonna,et al.  Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1980-2005. , 2008, Revue d'epidemiologie et de sante publique.

[14]  J. Estève,et al.  An overall strategy based on regression models to estimate relative survival and model the effects of prognostic factors in cancer survival studies , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  F. Bray,et al.  Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union. , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[16]  G. Launoy,et al.  Survival of cancer patients in France: a population-based study from The Association of the French Cancer Registries (FRANCIM). , 2007, European journal of cancer.