A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a U.S. Metropolitan Area

Abstract This article presents a study of spatial distribution of job openings and spatial variation in job accessibility in the Boston Metropolitan Area. The most striking finding is that despite decades of employment decentralization, job openings suitable for less-educated job seekers are still relatively concentrated in the central city. This is due to the fact that the great majority of job openings are vacancies resulting from turnover, the spatial concentration of which reflects the spatial concentration of current employment. A related finding is that for a given transportation mode, less-educated job seekers who reside in the central city still have, on average, somewhat better access to job openings than those who reside at the periphery of the metropolitan area. However, accessibility differentials among locations are small as compared to accessibility differentials between transportation modes. For job seekers who can travel by car, the majority of residential locations will allow them to have an access level higher than the average. For job seekers who depend on public transit, on the other hand, very few residential locations will allow them to have an above-average access level. These findings have important policy implications.

[1]  S. Raphael.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis and Black Youth Joblessness: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area* , 1998 .

[2]  P. Ong,et al.  Work and Car Ownership Among Welfare Recipients , 2022 .

[3]  Dan Immergluck,et al.  What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers , 1996 .

[4]  Sandra Rosenbloom,et al.  Gender Differences in Commuter Travel in Tucson: Implications for Travel Demand Management Programs , 2004 .

[5]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later , 1992 .

[6]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  Center Cities as Havens and Traps for Low-Income Communities: The Potential Impact of Advanced Information Technology , 1998 .

[7]  G. Pratt,et al.  Gender, Work and Space , 1995 .

[8]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears: New Implications for Race and Urban Poverty in the Global Economy , 1998, Celebrating 40 Years of Ethnic and Racial Studies.

[9]  D. Ellwood.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: are There Teenage Jobs Missing in the Ghetto? , 1983 .

[10]  A. Lacombe,et al.  WELFARE REFORM AND ACCESS TO JOBS IN BOSTON , 1998 .

[11]  R. Farley.  State of the Union: America in the 1990s, Volume 1: Economic Trends , 1997 .

[12]  Thomas W. Sanchez,et al.  The Connection Between Public Transit and Employment , 1999 .

[13]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  The Extent and Consequences of Job Turnover , 1994 .

[14]  J. Weibull.  An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility , 1976 .

[15]  M. Hughes.  A mobility strategy for improving opportunity , 1995 .

[16]  Q. Shen,et al.  Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers , 1998 .

[17]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Work and automobile ownership among welfare recipients , 1996 .

[18]  Brian D. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in US Metropolitan Areas , 1994 .

[19]  Martin Wachs,et al.  Can Transportation Strategies Help Meet the Welfare Challenge , 1998 .

[20]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  Job accessibility and welfare usage: Evidence from Los Angeles , 1997 .

[21]  James E. Rosenbaum,et al.  Changing the Geography of Opportunity by Expanding Residential Choice: Lessons from the Gautreaux Program , 1995 .