Prediction of Auditory and Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface Aptitude

Objective Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide a non-muscular communication channel for patients with late-stage motoneuron disease (e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)) or otherwise motor impaired people and are also used for motor rehabilitation in chronic stroke. Differences in the ability to use a BCI vary from person to person and from session to session. A reliable predictor of aptitude would allow for the selection of suitable BCI paradigms. For this reason, we investigated whether P300 BCI aptitude could be predicted from a short experiment with a standard auditory oddball. Methods Forty healthy participants performed an electroencephalography (EEG) based visual and auditory P300-BCI spelling task in a single session. In addition, prior to each session an auditory oddball was presented. Features extracted from the auditory oddball were analyzed with respect to predictive power for BCI aptitude. Results Correlation between auditory oddball response and P300 BCI accuracy revealed a strong relationship between accuracy and N2 amplitude and the amplitude of a late ERP component between 400 and 600 ms. Interestingly, the P3 amplitude of the auditory oddball response was not correlated with accuracy. Conclusions Event-related potentials recorded during a standard auditory oddball session moderately predict aptitude in an audiory and highly in a visual P300 BCI. The predictor will allow for faster paradigm selection. Significance Our method will reduce strain on patients because unsuccessful training may be avoided, provided the results can be generalized to the patient population.

[1]  A. Sanford,et al.  Slow potential correlates of preparatory set. , 1974, Biological psychology.

[2]  Emanuel Donchin,et al.  Bisensory stimulation: Inferring decision-related processes from the P300 component. , 1977 .

[3]  E Donchin,et al.  Bisensory stimulation: inferring decision-related processes from P300 component. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  D Friedman,et al.  A brain event related to the making of a sensory discrimination. , 1979, Science.

[5]  J. Pierce An introduction to information theory: symbols, signals & noise , 1980 .

[6]  L. Jacobs,et al.  An eye movement disorder in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 1981, Neurology.

[7]  S. Curry,et al.  Late slow wave components of auditory evoked potentials: their cognitive significance and interaction. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  5 The Orienting Reflex and the N2 Deflection of the Event-Related Potential (ERP) , 1983 .

[9]  T W Picton,et al.  N2 and automatic versus controlled processes. , 1986, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[10]  J. Selhorst,et al.  "Locked-in" syndrome. , 1987, Stroke.

[11]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. By C. Spearman, 1904. , 1987, The American journal of psychology.

[12]  E. Donchin,et al.  Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Barry L. Roberts,et al.  The Efferent System , 1989 .

[14]  Lang Tong,et al.  Indeterminacy and identifiability of blind identification , 1991 .

[15]  H. Lüders,et al.  American Electroencephalographic Society Guidelines for Standard Electrode Position Nomenclature , 1991, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[16]  J. Cohen,et al.  P300, stimulus intensity, modality, and probability. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  R. Leigh,et al.  Slow vertical saccades in motor neuron disease: Correlation of structure and function , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[18]  E. Schröger,et al.  Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event‐related brain potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[19]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Polich,et al.  Auditory and visual P300 topography from a 3 stimulus paradigm , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  R Verleger,et al.  Selective attention is impaired in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis--a study of event-related EEG potentials. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  N Birbaumer,et al.  Learning and self-regulation of slow cortical potentials in older adults. , 2000, Experimental aging research.

[23]  G. R. Muller,et al.  Brain oscillations control hand orthosis in a tetraplegic , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  Tommi Nykopp,et al.  Statistical Modelling Issues for The Adaptive Brain Interface , 2001 .

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the late ERP responses to deviant stimuli. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[26]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain potentials in human patients with extremely severe diffuse brain damage , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[27]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictors of successful self control during brain-computer communication , 2003, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[28]  Parallel processing of physical and lexical auditory information in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Research.

[29]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  An Auditory Paradigm for Brain-Computer Interfaces , 2004, NIPS.

[30]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[31]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  BCI2000: a general-purpose brain-computer interface (BCI) system , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Predictability of Brain-Computer Communication , 2004 .

[33]  Andrea Kübler,et al.  Brain-computer interfaces--the key for the conscious brain locked into a paralyzed body. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[34]  A. Cichocki,et al.  EEG filtering based on blind source separation (BSS) for early detection of Alzheimer's disease , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Niels Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer-interface research: Coming of age , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[36]  E. Donchin,et al.  A P300-based brain–computer interface: Initial tests by ALS patients , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Tomohiko Igasaki,et al.  Optimal methods of stimulus presentation and frequency analysis in P300-based brain-computer interfaces for patients with severe motor impairment. , 2006, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  Dean J Krusienski,et al.  A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller , 2006, Journal of neural engineering.

[39]  R. Fazel-Rezai,et al.  Human Error in P300 Speller Paradigm for Brain-Computer Interface , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[40]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online Artifact Removal for Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Support Vector Machines and Blind Source Separation , 2007, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[41]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  José del R. Millán,et al.  Evaluation Criteria for BCI Research , 2007 .

[43]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  An efficient P300-based brain–computer interface for disabled subjects , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[44]  D. McFarland,et al.  An auditory brain–computer interface (BCI) , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces and communication in paralysis: Extinction of goal directed thinking in completely paralysed patients? , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  Jonathan R. Folstein,et al.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[47]  L. Cohen,et al.  Brain–computer interface in paralysis , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[48]  E. W. Sellers,et al.  Toward enhanced P300 speller performance , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[49]  P. Tonin,et al.  P300-Based Brain–Computer Interface Communication: Evaluation and Follow-up in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis , 2009, Front. Neuropro..

[50]  C. Neuper,et al.  Toward a high-throughput auditory P300-based brain–computer interface , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[51]  A. Kübler,et al.  A Brain–Computer Interface Controlled Auditory Event‐Related Potential (P300) Spelling System for Locked‐In Patients , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[52]  K. Jellinger Toward Brain-Computer Interfacing , 2009 .

[53]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball (P300) spelling system for brain-computer interfaces. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[54]  Iñaki Iturrate,et al.  A Noninvasive Brain-Actuated Wheelchair Based on a P300 Neurophysiological Protocol and Automated Navigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[55]  Michael Bensch,et al.  Design and Implementation of a P300-Based Brain-Computer Interface for Controlling an Internet Browser , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[56]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  An auditory oddball brain–computer interface for binary choices , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[57]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  Does the ‘P300’ speller depend on eye gaze? , 2010, Journal of neural engineering.

[58]  C. Spearman The proof and measurement of association between two things. , 2015, International journal of epidemiology.

[59]  A. Kübler,et al.  Brain Painting: First Evaluation of a New Brain–Computer Interface Application with ALS-Patients and Healthy Volunteers , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[60]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance , 2010, NeuroImage.

[61]  J. Wolpaw,et al.  A novel P300-based brain–computer interface stimulus presentation paradigm: Moving beyond rows and columns , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[62]  A. Kübler,et al.  Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–computer interface use , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[63]  B. Blankertz,et al.  A New Auditory Multi-Class Brain-Computer Interface Paradigm: Spatial Hearing as an Informative Cue , 2010, PloS one.

[64]  M S Treder,et al.  Gaze-independent brain–computer interfaces based on covert attention and feature attention , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[65]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Neural mechanisms of brain–computer interface control , 2011, NeuroImage.

[66]  Donatella Mattia,et al.  A Brain-Computer Interface as Input Channel for a Standard Assistive Technology Software , 2011, Clinical EEG and neuroscience.

[67]  C. Neuper,et al.  Sensorimotor rhythm-based brain–computer interface training: the impact on motor cortical responsiveness , 2011, Journal of neural engineering.

[68]  A. Kübler,et al.  ERPs contributing to classification in the ”P300” BCI , 2011 .

[69]  Benjamin Blankertz,et al.  A Novel 9-Class Auditory ERP Paradigm Driving a Predictive Text Entry System , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[70]  Wolfgang Rosenstiel,et al.  Online use of error-related potentials in healthy users and people with severe motor impairment increases performance of a P300-BCI , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[71]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Spelling is Just a Click Away – A User-Centered Brain–Computer Interface Including Auto-Calibration and Predictive Text Entry , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[72]  Tobias Kaufmann,et al.  Effects of resting heart rate variability on performance in the P300 brain-computer interface. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[73]  K. Müller,et al.  Psychological predictors of SMR-BCI performance , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[74]  Christoph Braun,et al.  A portable auditory P300 brain–computer interface with directional cues , 2013, Clinical Neurophysiology.