Academic Misconduct: An Investigation into Male Students’ Perceptions, Experiences & Attitudes towards Cheating and Plagiarism in a Middle Eastern University Context

Academic misconduct in many educational institutions in the Middle East is an inherent problem. This has been particularly true amongst the university student population. The proliferation of the Internet and the ownership of mobile and electronic devices, have, in part, witnessed rates of cheating, plagiarism and academic misconduct cases steadily increase across higher education contexts. Though the growth of the Internet as an information source and gateway to knowledge has increased substantially in recent years, it has, however, opened up a plethora of varying forms and rates of academic dishonesty. This study was conducted through an online Likert scale questionnaire. Its purpose was to investigate first year male undergraduate students’ attitudes, experiences and perceptions towards plagiarism and cheating in a university located in Saudi Arabia. The study aimed at addressing themes in relation to the meaning, forms, source, frequency and reasons of cheating and plagiarism. The study indicates that cheating and plagiarism is common among students, while a need to address student awareness and clarify student expectations towards academic integrity was also identified. The study also proposes several recommendations to alleviate the levels of academic misconduct, be it cheating in exams or plagiarising content, in the Saudi university context.

[1]  M. Hosny,et al.  Attitude of Students Towards Cheating and Plagiarism: University Case Study , 2014 .

[2]  A. Ahmadi Cheating on Exams in the Iranian EFL Context , 2012 .

[3]  M. Williams,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING ACADEMIC DISHONESTY , 2003 .

[4]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Faculty and Academic Integrity: The Influence of Current Honor Codes and Past Honor Code Experiences , 2003 .

[5]  C. A. Simon,et al.  The Other Side of Academic Dishonesty: The relationship between faculty scepticism, gender and strategies for managing student academic dishonesty cases , 2003 .

[6]  Kenneth D. Butterfield,et al.  Dishonesty in Academic Environments , 2001 .

[7]  G. Diekhoff,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ACADEMIC DISHONESTY AND COLLEGE CLASSROOM ENVIRONMENT , 1999 .

[8]  Randy Genereux,et al.  Circumstances surrounding cheating: A questionnaire study of college students , 1995 .

[9]  Abdolmehdi Riazi,et al.  Research Methods in Applied Linguistics , 2010 .

[10]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  Research methods in applied linguistics : quantitative,qualitative, and mixed methodologies , 2007 .

[11]  N. Noddings Educating Moral People: A Caring Alternative to Character Education , 2002 .

[12]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  Cheating: Why Students Do It and How We Can Help Them Stop. , 2001 .

[13]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment , 1997 .

[14]  Melody A. Graham,et al.  Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student and Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors. , 1994 .

[15]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. , 1991 .