Drivers and Consequences of Narrative Transportation: Understanding the Role of Stories and Domain‐Specific Skills in Improving Radically New Products†

This article investigates the role of transportation in concept tests (i.e., a vivid mental image of a new product concept and the way of using it) for radically new products. Based on transportation literature, the article proposes that concept descriptions in a story format can stimulate transportation. Further, the article builds on the literature on domain‐specific skills to propose that technological reflectiveness (i.e., the ability to think about the impact of a technological product on its users and society in general) and product expertise increase transportation. The article explores the effect that transportation has on the ability of consumers to enumerate the advantages and disadvantages of a radically new product and on their ability to provide valuable concept improvement ideas (i.e., ideas that are highly novel, feasible, and beneficial for consumers). A quasi‐experiment with 253 participants demonstrates that a story format, product experience with related product categories, and technological reflectiveness increased transportation with regard to radically new products. The empirical research also showed that transportation facilitates the enumeration of the advantages and the disadvantages of a concept, resulting in more valuable concept improvement ideas. These findings suggest that innovation managers should strive to evoke transportation in concept tests for radically new products, as transportation allows consumers to provide more valuable input.

[1]  Ko de Ruyter,et al.  The Extended Transportation-Imagery Model: A Meta-Analysis of the Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers' Narrative Transportation , 2014 .

[2]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[3]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Users as a Hidden Resource for Creativity: Findings from an Experimental Study on User Involvement , 2002 .

[4]  Leonard Lee,et al.  Feeling the Future: The Emotional Oracle Effect , 2011 .

[5]  Michele Foley Tools to Refine and Screen Product Ideas in New Product Development , 2012 .

[6]  Dorothy A. Leonard The Limitations of Listening , 2002 .

[7]  Arne de Vet,et al.  Suspending Group Debate and Developing Concepts , 2013 .

[8]  C. Merle Crawford,et al.  New Products Management , 1983 .

[9]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Transportation Into Narrative Worlds: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Perceived Realism , 2004 .

[10]  S. Atkinson Explaining Creativity: The Science of Human Innovation , 2007 .

[11]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Effects of Self-Efficacy and Vividness on the Persuasiveness of Health Communications , 1997 .

[12]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model , 2006, MIS Q..

[13]  J. Füller,et al.  Consumers' Creative Talent: Which Characteristics Qualify Consumers for Open Innovation Projects? An Exploration of Asymmetrical Effects , 2012 .

[14]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[15]  A. Markman,et al.  “What Is It?” Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products , 2001 .

[16]  Jennifer Edson Escalas IMAGINE YOURSELF IN THE PRODUCT : Mental Simulation, Narrative Transportation, and Persuasion , 2004 .

[17]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[18]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[19]  Frank-Martin Belz,et al.  Netnography as a Method of Lead User Identification , 2010 .

[20]  Klaus Brockhoff,et al.  Customers' perspectives of involvement in new product development , 2003, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[21]  A. Markman,et al.  Inference using categories. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Technologically Reflective Individuals as Enablers of Social Innovation* , 2015, The Journal of product innovation management.

[23]  Pablo Azar,et al.  “So that's what that is”: Examining the impact of analogy on consumers' knowledge development for really new products , 2002 .

[24]  F. Piller,et al.  Open Innovation with Customers Foundations, Competences and International Trends , 2009 .

[25]  Scott G. Isaksen,et al.  Creative Approaches to Problem Solving , 2000 .

[26]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[27]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[28]  M. Knudsen The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success , 2007 .

[29]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  Willow A. Sheremata Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces in Radical New Product Development Under Time Pressure , 2000 .

[31]  D. Boud,et al.  Reflection, turning experience into learning , 1985 .

[32]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[33]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Nai-Hwa Lien,et al.  Narrative ads: The effect of argument strength and story format , 2013 .

[35]  W. Lyddon Creativity in Context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity" , 1998 .

[36]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Visualizing the Self: Exploring the Potential Benefits and Drawbacks for New Product Evaluation , 2004 .

[37]  Tony Proctor Creative Problem Solving for Managers , 2018 .

[38]  Victor V. Cordell Consumer knowledge measures as predictors in product evaluation , 1997 .

[39]  D. Mahr,et al.  The Value of Customer Co-Created Knowledge during the Innovation Process , 2013 .

[40]  Johann Füller,et al.  Virtual product experience and customer participation—A chance for customer-centred, really new products , 2007 .

[41]  Michael Song,et al.  How Do Individual‐Level Factors Affect the Creative Solution Formation Process of Teams? , 2015 .

[42]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Tuning Users' Innovativeness During Ideation , 2010 .

[43]  Chingching Chang,et al.  "Being Hooked" By Editorial Content: The Implications for Processing Narrative Advertising , 2009 .

[44]  Muammer Ozer,et al.  A survey of new product evaluation models , 1999 .

[45]  Suresh C. Sood,et al.  When consumers and brands talk: Storytelling theory and research in psychology and marketing , 2008 .

[46]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  Open Innovation: New Product Development Essentials from the PDMA , 2014 .

[47]  Mahshid Sotoudeh,et al.  Assistive technologies: Their development from a technology assessment perspective , 2013 .

[48]  John Roberts,et al.  The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status , 2004 .

[49]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed. , 2009 .

[50]  Mary T. Dzindolet,et al.  Social influence processes in group brainstorming. , 1993 .

[51]  Robert W. Veryzer Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products , 1998 .

[52]  D. Hoffman,et al.  The “Right” Consumers for Better Concepts: Identifying Consumers High in Emergent Nature to Develop New Product Concepts , 2010 .

[53]  A. Markman,et al.  Similar and Different : The Differentiation of Basic-Level Categories , 1997 .

[54]  M. Edwards-Schachter,et al.  Fostering quality of life through social innovation: a living lab methodology study case , 2012 .

[55]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts , 2006 .

[56]  Gary R. Schirr Flawed Tools: The Efficacy of Group Research Methods to Generate Customer Ideas , 2012 .

[57]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Competing For the Future : breakthrough strategies for seizing control of your industry and creating the markets of tomorrow , 1994 .

[58]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[59]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[60]  Maarten C. W. Janssen,et al.  Caring for healthcare entrepreneurs — Towards successful entrepreneurial strategies for sustainable innovations in Dutch healthcare , 2013 .

[61]  A. Page,et al.  Developing an effective concept testing program for consumer durables , 1992 .

[62]  P. Ziamou The Effect of the Degree of Newness of a Areally New@ Product on Consumers Judgments , 1999 .

[63]  Stephanie Watts,et al.  Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  Woody Wade,et al.  Scenario Planning: A Field Guide to the Future , 2012 .

[66]  A. Markman,et al.  Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products , 2001 .

[67]  Gilbert A. Churchill A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs , 1979 .

[68]  Adam Finn,et al.  Whose crystal ball to choose? Individual differences in the generalizability of concept testing , 2010 .

[69]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[70]  Brad Wardman,et al.  Voice of the customer , 2013, 2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit.

[71]  B. Byrne Structural equation modeling with EQS : basic concepts, applications, and programming , 2000 .

[72]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  Enhancing concept test validity by using expert consumers , 1995 .

[73]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer , 1997 .

[74]  Glen L. Urban,et al.  Lead User Analyses for the Development of New Industrial Products , 1988 .

[75]  Jennifer Edson Escalas Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration , 2007 .

[76]  Anna Kostygina,et al.  Narrative impact. Social and cognitive foundations , 2003, Z. für Medienpsychologie.

[77]  Pierre Wack,et al.  Scenarios : Uncharted Waters Ahead , 1996 .

[78]  M. Sujan,et al.  Managing Consumer Uncertainty in the Adoption of New Products: Temporal Distance and Mental Simulation , 2008 .

[79]  J. K. Broida Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Creating the Markets of Tomorrow , 1994 .

[80]  Gina Colarelli O'Connor,et al.  The nature of market visioning for technology-based radical innovation , 2001 .

[81]  Sonali K. Shah,et al.  How Communities Support Innovative Activities: An Exploration of Assistance and Sharing Among End-Users , 2003 .

[82]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Measuring Preferences for Really New Products , 2003 .

[83]  Nikolaus Franke,et al.  The "I Designed It Myself" Effect in Mass Customization , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[84]  Christopher Lettl,et al.  Exploring How Lead Users Develop Radical Innovation: Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[85]  S. Markham,et al.  Product Development and Management Association's 2012 Comparative Performance Assessment Study , 2013 .

[86]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Expert and exceptional performance: evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[87]  Ann E. Schlosser Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes versus Purchase Intentions , 2003 .

[88]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  Experiencing Narrative Worlds: On the Psychological Activities of Reading , 1993 .

[89]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[90]  V. Srinivasan,et al.  The Predictive Power of Internet‐Based Product Concept Testing Using Visual Depiction and Animation , 2000 .

[91]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[92]  D. Snelders,et al.  Narrative Transportation in Concept Tests for Really New Products: The Moderating Effect of Reader–Protagonist Similarity† , 2012 .

[93]  Jan Schoormans,et al.  The Story Is As Good As the Real Thing: Early Customer Input on Product Applications of Radically New Technologies , 2012 .

[94]  Cornelius Herstatt,et al.  User-innovators and "local" information: The case of mountain biking , 2005 .

[95]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Lessons from Ideation: Where Does User Involvement Lead Us? , 2014 .

[96]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[97]  R. Wyer,et al.  The Role of Narratives in Consumer Information Processing , 1998 .

[98]  Ling Peng,et al.  A framework for optimising the cost and performance of concept testing , 2012 .

[99]  Balder Onarheim,et al.  Product creativity assessment of innovations: considering the creative process , 2015 .

[100]  J. Hauser,et al.  The virtual customer , 2002 .

[101]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[102]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[103]  Darren W. Dahl,et al.  Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers' Creativity , 2005 .

[104]  A. Woodside Brand‐consumer storytelling theory and research: Introduction to a Psychology & Marketing special issue , 2010 .

[105]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .

[106]  Ling Peng,et al.  Concept testing: the state of contemporary practice , 2008 .

[107]  Robert H. Ennis Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability , 1996 .

[108]  Anna Kostygina,et al.  Narrative impact. Social and cognitive foundations , 2003, Z. für Medienpsychologie.

[109]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[110]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[111]  Steve Hoeffler,et al.  Imagination Difficulty and New Product Evaluation , 2012 .

[112]  J. Callahan,et al.  The Importance of Customer Input in the Development of Very New Products , 2004 .

[113]  E. Dahan,et al.  The predictive power of internet-based product concept testing using visual depiction and animation , 2000 .

[114]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  The Innovation Effect of User Design: Exploring Consumers’ Innovation Perceptions of Firms Selling Products Designed by Users , 2012 .

[115]  Joakim Wincent,et al.  Beyond Managing Uncertainty: Insights From Studying Equivocality in the Fuzzy Front End of Product and Process Innovation Projects , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[116]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Securities Trading of Concepts (STOC) , 2011 .