Effects of Daily and Flexible Non-Linear Periodization on Maximal and Submaximal Strength, Vertical Jump and Speed Performance of Brazilian Army Skydivers

Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effects of daily non-linear periodization (DNLP) and flexible (FNLP) models on maximal and submaximal strength, vertical jump and speed performance gains after 12 weeks of Brazilian army skydivers. Methods: Twenty-one recreationally trained men were randomly divided into three groups: DNLP (n = 7; age 32.71 ± 8.53; height: 1.74 ± 0; weight: 81.57 ± 11.97), FNLP (n = 6; age 26.50 ± 7.18; height: 1.71 ± 0.05 and weight: 75.50 ± 12.73) and a control (CG. N = 8; age = 18.87 ± 0.59; height = 1.73 ± 0.046; weight = 71.67 ± 5.34). Before and after the 12 week of training each participant was evaluated for maximal (1-RM) and submaximal strength (8-RM) of bench press (BP) and leg press (LP) exercises, squat jump (SJ) and countermovement jump (CMJ) performance and speed test over 5 m, 60 m and 100 m. Results: The DNLP and FNLP groups showed similar increases for 1-RM and 8-RM loads in BP and LP exercises, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). Similar SJ and CMJ performance noted in posttest between FNLP and DNLP groups (p ≤ 0.05). Both CG and FNLP groups showed an augmentation in time-performance of 60 m and 100 m speed test, respectively (p ≤ 0.05). However, for 5 m speed test, similar decreasing in time-performance during posttest was noted under DNLP (p = 0.001) and FNLP (p = 0.002) groups. Conclusion: The DNLP and FNLP models were equally effective in improving 5 m speed performance, maximal and submaximal strength after 12 weeks training period with recreationally trained Brazilian army skydivers.

[1]  David P. Looney,et al.  The Effects of Resistance Training Prioritization in NCAA Division I Football Summer Training , 2014, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[2]  Matthew R Rhea,et al.  A Comparison of Linear and Daily Undulating Periodized Programs with Equated Volume and Intensity for Strength , 2002, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[3]  Stephen J. Rossi,et al.  A COMPARISON OF PERIODIZATION MODELS DURING NINE WEEKS WITH EQUATED VOLUME AND INTENSITY FOR STRENGTH , 2007, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[4]  Liliam Fernandes,et al.  Comparison Between Nonlinear and Linear Periodized Resistance Training: Hypertrophic and Strength Effects , 2012, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[5]  A. Rebelo,et al.  Short-Term Effects of Complex and Contrast Training in Soccer Players' Vertical Jump, Sprint, and Agility Abilities , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  Effect of Concurrent Training, Flexible Nonlinear Periodization, and Maximal-Effort Cycling on Strength and Power , 2013, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Comparison Between Linear and Nonlinear In‐Season Training Programs in Freshman Football Players , 2003, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  Franco M Impellizzeri,et al.  Validity and Reliability of Optojump Photoelectric Cells for Estimating Vertical Jump Height , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  M. Rhea DETERMINING THE MAGNITUDE OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN STRENGTH TRAINING RESEARCH THROUGH THE USE OF THE EFFECT SIZE , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[10]  W. J. Stone,et al.  The Effects of Periodization Versus Progressive Resistance Exercise on Upper and Lower Body Strength in Women , 1996 .

[11]  J. Prestes,et al.  Comparison of Linear and Reverse Linear Periodization Effects on Maximal Strength and Body Composition , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[12]  R. Callister,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Linear and Undulating Periodized Resistance Training Programs on Muscular Strength , 2015, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  R. Cox,et al.  The Acute Effects of Static Stretching on the Sprint Performance of Collegiate Men in the 60- and 100-m Dash After a Dynamic Warm-Up , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  J. Prestes,et al.  Effects of Linear vs. Daily Undulatory Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal and Submaximal Strength Gains , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[15]  Dietmar Schmidtbleicher,et al.  Effects of Different Periodization Models on Rate of Force Development and Power Ability of the Upper Extremity , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  Paavo V. Komi,et al.  A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping , 2004, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[17]  Position Stand American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  J. Kiely New Horizons for the Methodology and Physiology of Training Periodization Block Periodization : New Horizon or a False Dawn ? , 2012 .

[19]  David J Stearne,et al.  Flexible Nonlinear Periodization in a Beginner College Weight Training Class , 2010, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[20]  Shaher A. I. Shalfawi,et al.  The Effect of 40-m Repeated Sprint Training on Maximum Sprinting Speed, Repeated Sprint Speed Endurance, Vertical Jump, and Aerobic Capacity in Young Elite Male Soccer Players , 2011, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[21]  Leonardo Lamas,et al.  SHORT‐TERM EFFECTS ON LOWER‐BODY FUNCTIONAL POWER DEVELOPMENT: WEIGHTLIFTING VS.VERTICAL JUMP TRAINING PROGRAMS , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[22]  C. Ugrinowitsch,et al.  Nonlinear Periodization Maximizes Strength Gains in Split Resistance Training Routines , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[23]  Matthew R Rhea,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Periodized versus Nonperiodized Strength and Power Training Programs , 2004, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.