Normative data for evaluating mild traumatic brain injury with a handheld neurocognitive assessment tool

ABSTRACT The BrainScope Ahead 300 is designed for use by health care professionals to aid in the assessment of patients suspected of a mild traumatic brain injury. The purpose of the current study was to establish normative data for the cognitive test component of the Ahead 300 system and to evaluate the role of demographic factors on test performance. Healthy, community-dwelling adults between the ages of 18 and 80 recruited from five geographically distributed sites were administered Android versions of the ANAM Matching to Sample and Procedural Reaction Time tests that comprise the cognitive test component of the Ahead 300 system by trained personnel. Scores were correlated with age, education, and race. Age accounted for the majority of the variance in test scores with additional significant, but minor, contributions of education and race. Gender did not account for a significant proportion of the variance for either test. Based on these results, the normative data for 551 individuals are presented stratified by age. These are the first available normative data for these tests when administered using the Ahead 300 system and will assist health care professionals in determining the degree to which scores on the cognitive tests reflect impaired performance.

[1]  M. Zonfrillo,et al.  Emergency department visits for head trauma in the United States , 2016, BMC Emergency Medicine.

[2]  E. Lerner,et al.  Prospective, Head-to-Head Study of Three Computerized Neurocognitive Assessment Tools (CNTs): Reliability and Validity for the Assessment of Sport-Related Concussion , 2015, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[3]  I. Benseñor,et al.  Education plays a greater role than age in cognitive test performance among participants of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil) , 2015, BMC Neurology.

[4]  D. Matchar,et al.  Presence of and correction for interviewer error on an instrument assessing cognitive function of older adults , 2015, Geriatrics & gerontology international.

[5]  R. Kane,et al.  Using base rates of low scores to interpret the ANAM4 TBI-MIL battery following mild traumatic brain injury. , 2015, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[6]  G. Iverson,et al.  Advanced topics in neuropsychological assessment following sport-related concussion , 2015, Brain injury.

[7]  Corson N. Areshenkoff,et al.  The neuropsychological outcomes of concussion: a systematic review of meta-analyses on the cognitive sequelae of mild traumatic brain injury. , 2014, Neuropsychology.

[8]  C. Cullum,et al.  Computerized Neurocognitive Testing in the Management of Sport-Related Concussion: An Update , 2013, Neuropsychology Review.

[9]  Walter Carr,et al.  ANAM4 TBI reaction time-based tests have prognostic utility for acute concussion. , 2013, Military medicine.

[10]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Evidence for added value of baseline testing in computer-based cognitive assessment. , 2013, Journal of athletic training.

[11]  Michael Makdissi,et al.  Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport, Zurich, November 2012. , 2013, Journal of athletic training.

[12]  H. Levin,et al.  Acute White Matter Differences in the Fornix Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2013, Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging.

[13]  R. Adams,et al.  Efficacy of the ANAM General Neuropsychological Screening battery (ANAM GNS) for Detecting Neurocognitive Impairment in a Mixed Clinical Sample , 2013, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[14]  Michael Makdissi,et al.  Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport—The 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport Held in Zurich, November 2012 , 2013, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[15]  G. Gioia,et al.  Advances in neuropsychological assessment of sport-related concussion , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[16]  Allen K. Sills,et al.  Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 4th International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich, November 2012 , 2013, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[17]  Jared M. Bruce,et al.  The Utility of Post-Concussion Neuropsychological Data in Identifying Cognitive Change Following Sports-Related MTBI in the Absence of Baseline Data , 2012, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[18]  K. Guskiewicz,et al.  Identifying Impairments after concussion: normative data versus individualized baselines. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  L. Prichep,et al.  Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury Severity Using Informed Data Reduction in a Series of Binary Classifier Algorithms , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[20]  Michael N Dretsch,et al.  Assessment of acute concussion in the combat environment. , 2012, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[21]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (v4) Traumatic Brain Injury Battery: military normative data. , 2012, Military medicine.

[22]  A. Ardila,et al.  Comparing cognitive performance in illiterate and literate children , 2012 .

[23]  M. Dretsch,et al.  The ANAM lacks utility as a diagnostic or screening tool for concussion more than 10 days following injury. , 2012, Military medicine.

[24]  Craig Bryan,et al.  Magnitudes of Decline on Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics Subtest Scores Relative to Predeployment Baseline Performance Among Service Members Evaluated for Traumatic Brain Injury in Iraq , 2012, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[25]  T. van Achterberg,et al.  How older people nurses assess cognitive function through daily observation. , 2011, International journal of older people nursing.

[26]  Craig J Bryan,et al.  Comparison of Concussive Symptoms, Cognitive Performance, and Psychological Symptoms Between Acute Blast-Versus Nonblast-Induced Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2010, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[27]  M. Wald,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths, 2002-2006 , 2010 .

[28]  B. Golomb,et al.  Prevalence and Psychological Correlates of Traumatic Brain Injury in Operation Iraqi Freedom , 2010, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[29]  H. Belanger,et al.  Mild traumatic brain injury and posttraumatic stress disorder and their associations with health symptoms. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  Kirby Gilliland,et al.  Reference data from the automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics for use in traumatic brain injury in an active duty military sample. , 2008, Military medicine.

[31]  D. Warden,et al.  Influence of Demographics on Computerized Cognitive Testing in a Military Sample , 2008 .

[32]  R. Ruff,et al.  Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[33]  G. Pearlson,et al.  Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing , 2008, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[34]  Steven P. Broglio,et al.  SENSITIVITY OF THE CONCUSSION ASSESSMENT BATTERY , 2007, Neurosurgery.

[35]  J. Bleiberg,et al.  Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics sports medicine battery. , 2007, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[36]  Robert L Kane,et al.  Identifying and monitoring cognitive deficits in clinical populations using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) tests. , 2007, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[37]  D. Thorne,et al.  Throughput: A simple performance index with desirable characteristics , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[38]  C. Gualtieri,et al.  Reliability and validity of a computerized neurocognitive test battery, CNS Vital Signs. , 2006, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[39]  D. Warden,et al.  Military TBI During the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars , 2006, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[40]  F. Craik,et al.  Cognition through the lifespan: mechanisms of change , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  H. Belanger,et al.  The neuropsychological impact of sports-related concussion: A meta-analysis , 2005, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[42]  J. Algina,et al.  Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs. , 2003, Psychological methods.

[43]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  New criteria for female athlete triad syndrome? , 2002, The Physician and sportsmedicine.

[44]  J. Bleiberg,et al.  Factor Analysis of Computerized and Traditional Tests Used in Mild Brain Injury Research , 2000, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[45]  J. Bleiberg,et al.  Future Directions for the Neuropsychological Assessment of Sports Concussion , 1998, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[46]  J. Bleiberg,et al.  Consistency of within-day and across-day performance after mild brain injury. , 1997, Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and behavioral neurology.

[47]  R. Cantu Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) Practices of Sports Medicine Professionals , 2010 .

[48]  R. Cantu Sensitivity of the Concussion Assessment Battery , 2008 .

[49]  Marlena M. Wald,et al.  Nonfatal traumatic brain injuries from sports and recreation activities--United States, 2001-2005. , 2007, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[50]  J. Langlois,et al.  Traumatic brain injury in the United States; emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths , 2006 .

[51]  Lee Ryan,et al.  Demographic influences on neuropsychological test performance. , 1996 .