Left-Hemisphere Dominance for Motion Processing in Deaf Signers

Evidence from neurophysiological studies in animals as well as humans has demonstrated robust changes in neural organization and function following early-onset sensory deprivation. Unfortunately, the perceptual consequences of these changes remain largely unexplored. The study of deaf individuals who have been auditorily deprived since birth and who rely on a visual language (i.e., American Sign Language, ASL) for communication affords a unique opportunity to investigate the degree to which perception in the remaining, intact senses (e.g., vision) is modified as a result of altered sensory and language experience. We studied visual motion perception in deaf individuals and compared their performance with that of hearing subjects. Thresholds and reaction times were obtained for a motion discrimination task, in both central and peripheral vision. Although deaf and hearing subjects had comparable absolute scores on this task, a robust and intriguing difference was found regarding relative performance for left-visual-field (LVF) versus right-visual-field (RVF) stimuli: Whereas hearing subjects exhibited a slight LVF advantage, the deaf exhibited a strong RVF advantage. Thus, for deaf subjects, the left hemisphere may be specialized for motion processing. These results suggest that perceptual processes required for the acquisition and comprehension of language (motion processing, in the case of ASL) are recruited (or “captured”) by the left, language-dominant hemisphere.

[1]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[2]  J. Rauschecker Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex , 1995, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  S. McCullough,et al.  Face processing by deaf ASL signers: evidence for expertise in distinguished local features. , 1997, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[4]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Visual cortex activation in blind humans during sound discrimination , 1995, Neuroscience Letters.

[5]  M. Hallett,et al.  Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects , 1996, Nature.

[6]  C. Mills Perception of visual temporal patterns by deaf and hearing adults , 1985 .

[7]  U. Bellugi,et al.  The linguistic basis of left hemisphere specialization. , 1992, Science.

[8]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Visual imagery and visual-spatial language: Enhanced imagery abilities in deaf and hearing ASL signers , 1993, Cognition.

[9]  E. Carlier,et al.  Enhancement of visual responses on the primary auditory cortex of the cat after an early destruction of cochlear receptors , 1977, Brain Research.

[10]  S. Christman Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing , 1997 .

[11]  M. Sur,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity in cortical development: differentiation and specification of sensory neocortex , 1990, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  B. Einspruch Deaf in America: Voices From a Culture , 1989 .

[13]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Auditory Localization Behaviour in Visually Deprived Cats , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[14]  W. Newsome,et al.  A selective impairment of motion perception following lesions of the middle temporal visual area (MT) , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Paré,et al.  Early-blind human subjects localize sound sources better than sighted subjects , 1998, Nature.

[16]  S. Levänen,et al.  Vibration-induced auditory-cortex activation in a congenitally deaf adult , 1998, Current Biology.

[17]  H. Poizner,et al.  Temporal processing in deaf signers , 1987, Brain and Language.

[18]  Wing Hong Lore,et al.  Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals , 1991 .

[19]  D Bavelier,et al.  Cerebral organization for language in deaf and hearing subjects: biological constraints and effects of experience. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  F Rösler,et al.  Topographic differences of slow event-related brain potentials in blind and sighted adult human subjects during haptic mental rotation. , 1993, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[21]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults , 1983, Brain Research.

[22]  Ila Parasnis,et al.  Parafoveal attention in congenitally deaf and hearing young adults , 1985, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Sensory mapping in a congenitally deaf subject: MEG and fRMI studies of cross‐modal non‐plasticity , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[24]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[25]  U. Bellugi,et al.  Language, modality and the brain , 1989, Trends in Neurosciences.