Effects of Contour Enhancement on Low-Vision Preference and Visual Search

Purpose. To determine whether image enhancement improves visual search performance and whether enhanced images were also preferred by subjects with vision impairment. Methods. Subjects (n = 24) with vision impairment (vision: 20/52 to 20/240) completed visual search and preference tasks for 150 static images that were enhanced to increase object contours' visual saliency. Subjects were divided into two groups and were shown three enhancement levels. Original and Medium enhancements were shown to both groups. High enhancement was shown to group 1, and Low enhancement was shown to group 2. For search, subjects pointed to an object that matched a search target displayed at the top left of the screen. An “integrated search performance” measure (area under the curve of cumulative correct response rate over search time) quantified performance. For preference, subjects indicated the preferred side when viewing the same image with different enhancement levels on side-by-side high-definition televisions. Results. Contour enhancement did not improve performance in the visual search task. Group 1 subjects significantly (p < 0.001) rejected the High enhancement, and showed no preference for Medium enhancement over the Original images. Group 2 subjects significantly preferred (p < 0.001) both the Medium and the Low enhancement levels over Original. Contrast sensitivity was correlated with both preference and performance; subjects with worse contrast sensitivity performed worse in the search task (&rgr; = 0.77, p < 0.001) and preferred more enhancement (&rgr; = −0.47, p = 0.02). No correlation between visual search performance and enhancement preference was found. However, a small group of subjects (n = 6) in a narrow range of mid-contrast sensitivity performed better with the enhancement, and most (n = 5) also preferred the enhancement. Conclusions. Preferences for image enhancement can be dissociated from search performance in people with vision impairment. Further investigations are needed to study the relationships between preference and performance for a narrow range of mid-contrast sensitivity where a beneficial effect of enhancement may exist.

[1]  John T. Flynn,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye: Clinical Application, 10th ed , 2003 .

[2]  Eli Peli,et al.  Image Enhancement For The Visually Impaired , 1984 .

[3]  Francis Heed Adler,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the eye;: Clinical application , 1976 .

[4]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Contour Enhancement Benefits Older Adults with Simulated Central Field Loss , 2022 .

[5]  E. Peli,et al.  8.2: Factors Affecting Image Quality Preferences , 2010 .

[6]  Bernice E. Rogowitz,et al.  Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II , 1997 .

[7]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[8]  I L Bailey,et al.  Face recognition in age-related maculopathy. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[9]  Jerry Sebag,et al.  Image enhancement improves reading performance in age-related macular degeneration patients , 1998, Vision Research.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[12]  E Peli,et al.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired: the effects of enhancement on face recognition. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[13]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  THE DESIGN OF A NEW LETTER CHART FOR MEASURING CONTRAST SENSITIVITY , 1988 .

[14]  E Peli.  Limitations of image enhancement for the visually impaired. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  E. Peli.  Feature detection algorithm based on a visual system model , 2002, Proc. IEEE.

[16]  Martin Rubinstein,et al.  Image enhancement of real-time television to benefit the visually impaired. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Eric Castet,et al.  Gaze-contingent simulation of retinopathy: Some potential pitfalls and remedies , 2011, Vision Research.

[18]  Eli Peli,et al.  MPEG-based image enhancement for the visually impaired , 2004 .

[19]  Eli Peli,et al.  Image enhancement in the JPEG domain for people with vision impairment , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  Wideband enhancement of television images for people with visual impairments. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[21]  Robert W. Massof,et al.  Racial variations in causes of vision loss in nursing homes: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation in Nursing Home Groups (SEEING) Study. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[22]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Statistical Edge Detection: Learning and Evaluating Edge Cues , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[23]  Benita J. O’Colmain,et al.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[24]  E. Peli.  Recognition performance and perceived quality of video enhanced for the visually impaired , 2005, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[25]  Michael A. Webster,et al.  Neural adjustments to image blur , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[26]  Russell L Woods,et al.  Television, computer and portable display device use by people with central vision impairment , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  E. Peli,et al.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired. Simulations and experimental results. , 1991, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[28]  E Peli,et al.  Scrolled and rapid serial visual presentation texts are read at similar rates by the visually impaired. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  S. Lipovetsky,et al.  Thurstone scaling via binary response regression , 2004 .

[30]  Fuensanta A. Vera-Diaz,et al.  Adaptation to Image Blur in the Peripheral Field of Normally-Sighted Observers and Patients With Central Field Loss - 2 , 2009 .

[31]  E. Peli,et al.  Shape and individual variability of the blur adaptation curve , 2010, Vision Research.

[32]  Eli Peli,et al.  Image Enhancement for Impaired Vision: the Challenge of Evaluation , 2009, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[33]  Eli Peli,et al.  Complexities of complex contrast , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[34]  L. Arend,et al.  Computerized Image Enhancement for Visually Impaired Persons: New Technology, New Possibilities , 1986 .

[35]  Eli Peli,et al.  Measuring perceived video quality of MPEG enhancement by people with impaired vision. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  E. Peli,et al.  Image invariance with changes in size: the role of peripheral contrast thresholds. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  Yitzhak Yitzhaky,et al.  Wide–Band Enhancement of TV Images For The Visually Impaired , 2004 .

[38]  Gang Luo,et al.  Visual search performance of patients with vision impairment: effect of JPEG image enhancement , 2012, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[39]  Eli Peli,et al.  Statistical analysis of subjective preferences for video enhancement , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[40]  T. B. Lawton.  Improved reading performance using individualized compensation filters for observers with losses in central vision. , 1989, Ophthalmology.

[41]  J. Wolfe,et al.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  R. Haber,et al.  Visual Perception , 2018, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[43]  Eli Peli,et al.  Digital enhancement of television signals for people with visual impairments: Evaluation of a consumer product , 2008, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[44]  R. Woods.  Reliability of visual performance measurement under optical degradation , 1993, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[45]  Susan J Leat,et al.  Quantitative assessment of perceived visibility enhancement with image processing for single face images: a preliminary study. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[46]  E. M. Fine,et al.  EVALUATING VIDEO ENHANCEMENT FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED VIEWERS , 1996 .

[47]  Eli Peli,et al.  Post Transmission Digital Video Enhancement for People with Visual Impairments. , 2006, Journal of the Society for Information Display.

[48]  R. Schuchard,et al.  A Test of Face Discrimination Ability in Aging and Vision Loss , 2011, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[49]  T. B. Lawton.  Improved word recognition for observers with age-related maculopathies using compensation filters , 1988 .

[50]  E. Peli,et al.  Contrast sensitivity function and image discrimination. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.