Comparison of carbon dioxide emissions intensity of steel production in China, Germany, Mexico, and the United States

Abstract Production of iron and steel is an energy-intensive manufacturing process. The goal of this study was to develop a methodology for accurately and more fairly comparing the energy-related carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions intensity of steel production in different countries and to demonstrate the application of this methodology in an analysis of the steel industry in China, Germany, Mexico, and the U.S. Our methodology addresses the industry’s boundary definition, conversion factors, and industry structure. The results of our analysis show that, for the entire iron and steel production process, the base-case (2010) CO2 emissions intensity was 2148 kg CO2/tonne crude steel in China, 1708 kg CO2/tonne crude steel in Germany, 1080 kg CO2/tonne crude steel in Mexico, and 1736 kg CO2/tonne crude steel in the U.S. One of the main reasons that Mexico has the lowest CO2 emissions intensity is Mexico’s large share of steel production using electric arc furnaces (EAFs) (69.4%). EAF steel production has lower CO2 emissions intensity than production using blast furnaces/basic oxygen furnaces. China, by contrast, has the smallest share of EAF production among the four countries—9.8% in the base-case year 2010. In one scenario, we applied the Chinese share of EAF production to the other three case-study countries; the result was an increase in CO2 emissions intensity of steel production of 19% (2036 kg CO2/tonne crude steel) in Germany, 92% (2074 kgCO2/tonne crude steel) in Mexico, and 56% (2703 kg CO2/tonne crude steel) in the U.S. compared to these countries’ base-case analyses. In another scenario, we applied the Chinese national average grid electricity CO2 emissions factor from 2010, which is the highest emissions factor among the four countries, to the other three countries. In that scenario, the CO2 emissions intensity of steel production increased by 5% in Germany, 11% in Mexico, and 10% in the U.S.

[1]  Nawshad Haque,et al.  Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from ferroalloy production using life cycle assessment with particular reference to Australia , 2013 .

[2]  Marcus Kirschen,et al.  Influence of direct reduced iron on the energy balance of the electric arc furnace in steel industry , 2011 .

[3]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy Intensity Development of the German Iron and Steel Industry between 1991 and 2007 , 2012 .

[4]  Okonkwo Paul Chukwuleke,et al.  Shift from coke to coal using direct reduction method and challenges , 2009 .

[5]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  International comparison of CO2 emission trends in the iron and steel industry , 2002 .

[6]  Barry Hyman,et al.  Energy and material flow models for the US steel industry , 2001 .

[7]  A. Tornell,et al.  Rational Atrophy: The Us Steel Industry , 1997 .

[8]  Brynhildur Davidsdottir,et al.  Impacts of Market-Based Climate Change Policy on the U.S. Iron and Steel Industry , 2000 .

[9]  Kanako Tanaka,et al.  Assessment of energy efficiency performance measures in industry and their application for policy , 2008 .

[10]  Kornelis Blok,et al.  The quality of energy intensity indicators for international comparison in the iron and steel industry , 2001 .

[11]  Lynn Price,et al.  A Comparison of Iron and Steel Production Energy Use and Energy Intensity in China and the U.S. , 2014 .

[12]  John Stubbles,et al.  Energy use in the U.S. steel industry: a historical perspective and future opportunities , 2000 .

[13]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Energy intensity in the iron and steel industry: a comparison of physical and economic indicators , 1997 .