(In)vulnerable agreement in incomplete bilingual L1 learners

This study investigates morphological vulnerability in incomplete bilingual L1 acquisition. It examines the production of L1 inflections by L2-dominant bilingual children, with the aim of exploring causes of difficulty in agreement marking. Spontaneous data (18 hours) from six Hungarian-English bilingual children, aged seven to nine, is used to compare the production of possessive inflections and verbal inflections, which are expressed by identical surface morphology in Hungarian. Drawing on recent analysis of Hungarian (Alberti, 1995; Szabolcsi, 1994), the paper asks where and why agreement morphology is susceptible to variability in bilingual children's weaker L1. Results indicate significant differences in the accuracy of agreement morphology. Inflections are almost error-free in possessive nominals and subject-verb agreement. However, they are frequently omitted in possessive be-clauses, which can be attributed to a combination of factors: (i) influence of semantic-syntactic properties of English have on Hungarian be possessive construction (transfer from L2); (ii) difficulty with long-distance agreement in Hungarian be-possessives (structural complexity of L1); and (iii) influence of Hungarian existential and locative constructions on possessive-be (ambiguity in L1). It is argued that morphological variability is selective, and the main source of vulnerability is the syntax-semantics interface where the weaker L1 is most susceptible to L2 influence.

[1]  A. Hulk,et al.  Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics , 2000 .

[2]  Elena Gavruseva,et al.  On the syntax of possessor extraction , 2000 .

[3]  Carmen Silva-Corvalán.  Language Contact and Change: Spanish in Los Angeles , 1996 .

[4]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  The acquisition of the syntax of negation in French and German: contrasting first and second language development , 1997 .

[5]  Lydia White,et al.  Fossilization in steady state L2 grammars: Persistent problems with inflectional morphology , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[6]  Lydia White,et al.  Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement , 2000 .

[7]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Age Differences in Second Language Acquisition. , 1975 .

[8]  Tania Ionin,et al.  Why is ‘is’ easier than ‘-s’?: acquisition of tense/agreement morphology by child second language learners of English , 2002 .

[9]  K. Wexler,et al.  Verb movement: Finiteness and head movement in early child grammars , 1994 .

[10]  Longxing Wei,et al.  Types of morphemes and their implications for second language morpheme acquisition , 2000 .

[11]  M. Polinsky.  Cross-Linguistic Parallels in Language Loss. , 1995 .

[12]  Natascha Müller.  Transfer in bilingual first language acquisition , 1998, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[13]  Aafke Hulk,et al.  Crosslinguistic influence in bilingual language acquisition: Italian and French as recipient languages , 2001, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[14]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Double Agreement: Role Identification in Hungarian , 1997 .

[15]  Robert M. Vago,et al.  First language attrition: The study of first language attrition: an overview , 1991 .

[16]  Carol Myers-Scotton,et al.  Contact Linguistics: Bilingual encounters and grammatical outcomes , 2013 .

[17]  Carol Pfaff.  Turkish in contact with German: Language maintenance and loss among immigrant children in Berlin (West) , 1991 .

[18]  Mark Aronoff,et al.  First language attrition: Morphological disintegration and reconstruction in first language attrition , 1991 .

[19]  S. Montrul.  Incomplete acquisition and attrition of Spanish tense/aspect distinctions in adult bilinguals , 2002, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[20]  G. Håkansson.  Tense morphology and verb-second in Swedish L1 children, L2 children and children with SLI , 2001, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[21]  Suzanne Schlyter.  Progression & regression in language: The weaker language in bilingual Swedish-French children , 1993 .

[22]  J. Zwart.  The Minimalist Program , 1998, Journal of Linguistics.

[23]  Aafke Hulk,et al.  Bilingual first language acquisition at the interface between syntax and pragmatics , 2000 .

[24]  K. Kiss.  Configurationality in Hungarian , 1987 .

[25]  Brian MacWhinney,et al.  Hungarian research on the acquisition of morphology and syntax , 1976, Journal of Child Language.

[26]  K. Bot.  A bilingual production model: Levelt’s ‘speaking’ model adapted , 2003 .

[27]  Christer Platzack.  The Initial Hypothesis of Syntax , 1996 .

[28]  Monika S. Schmid,et al.  Language attrition: The next phase , 2004 .

[29]  Ayşe Gürel,et al.  Selectivity in L2-induced L1 attrition: a psycholinguistic account , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[30]  Rex A. Sprouse,et al.  L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model , 1996 .

[31]  K. Bot,et al.  Language Reversion Revisited , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[32]  Carmen Silva-Corvalán,et al.  First language attrition: Spanish language attrition in a contact situation with English , 1991 .

[33]  Richard S. Kayne.  TOWARD A MODULAR THEORY OF AUXILIARY SELECTION , 1993 .

[34]  Thomas Roeper.  Universal bilingualism , 1999 .

[35]  Agnes Bolonyai,et al.  Case Systems in Contact: Syntactic and Lexical Case in Bilingual Child Language , 2002 .

[36]  Christer Platzack,et al.  The Vulnerable C-domain , 2001, Brain and Language.

[37]  M. D. Dikken,et al.  On the Structural Representation of Possession and Agreement: the Case of (Anti-)agreement in Hungarian Possessed Nominal Phrases , 1999 .

[38]  R. Hawkins,et al.  2. Locating the source of defective past tense marking in advanced L2 English speakers , 2003 .

[39]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Native language attrition and developmental instability at the syntax-discourse interface: Data, interpretations and methods , 2004, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[40]  Antonella Sorace,et al.  Differential effects of attrition in the L1 syntax of near-native L2 speakers , 2000 .

[41]  Carolyn G. Madden,et al.  IS THERE A “NATURAL SEQUENCE” IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING? , 1974 .

[42]  Agnes Bolonyai,et al.  “Elective affinities”: Language contact in the abstract lexicon and its structural consequences , 2000 .

[43]  M. Clyne,et al.  Dynamics of Language Contact , 2003 .

[44]  Donna Lardiere.  Case and Tense in the ‘fossilized’ steady state , 1998 .

[45]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  Principles of Universal Grammar and Strategies of Language Learning: Some Similarities and Differencies between First and Second Language Acquisition , 1991 .

[46]  Agnes Bolonyai,et al.  In-Between Languages: Language Shift/Maintenance in Childhood Bilingualism , 1998 .

[47]  Lily Wong Fillmore.  When Learning a Second Language Means Losing the First. , 1991 .

[48]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX , 1973 .

[49]  Vivian Cook,et al.  Chapter 1. Introduction: The Changing L1 in the L2 User’s Mind , 2003 .

[50]  Liliana Sánchez,et al.  Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua Spanish bilinguals , 2004, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[51]  U. Neisser.  Interpreting Harry Bahrick's discovery: what confers immunity against forgetting? , 1984 .

[52]  Silvina A. Montrul.  Convergent outcomes in L2 acquisition and L1 loss , 2004 .

[53]  Juana M. Liceras,et al.  Functional Categories and Acquisition Orders , 1994 .

[54]  Anna Szabolcsi.  THE POSSESSOR THAT RAN AWAY FROM HOME , 1983 .

[55]  Seán Devitt,et al.  Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory , 2000 .

[56]  Caroline Heycock,et al.  First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English , 2004 .

[57]  Christer Platzack,et al.  The initial hypothesis of syntax : a minimalist perspective on language acquisition and attrition , 1994 .

[58]  K. Debot.  A bilingual production model : Levelt's 'speaking' model adapted , 1992 .