Design and evaluation of a high sensitivity spiral TDR scour sensor

Bridge scour accounts for more than half of the reported bridge failures in the United States. Scour monitoring technology based on time domain reflectometry (TDR) features the advantages of being automatic and inexpensive. The senior author's team has developed a few generations of a TDR bridge scour monitoring system, which have succeeded in both laboratory and field evaluations. In this study, an innovative spiral TDR sensor is proposed to further improve the sensitivity of the TDR sensor in scour detection. The spiral TDR sensor is made of a parallel copper wire waveguide wrapped around a mounting rod. By using a spiral path for the waveguide, the TDR sensor achieves higher sensitivity than the traditional straight TDR probes due to longer travel distance of the electromagnetic (EM) wave per unit length in the spiral probe versus traditional probe. The performance of the new TDR spiral scour sensor is validated by calibration with liquids with known dielectric constant and wet soils. Laboratory simulated scour-refilling experiments are performed to evaluate the performance of the new spiral probe in detecting the sediment–water interface and therefore the scour-refill process. The tests results indicate that scour depth variation of less than 2 cm can be easily detected by this new spiral sensor. A theory is developed based on the dielectric mixing model to simplify the TDR signal analyses for scour depth detection. The sediment layer thickness (directly related to scour depth) varies linearly with the square root of the bulk dielectric constant of the water–sediment mixture measured by the spiral TDR probe, which matches the results of theoretical prediction. The estimated sediment layer thickness and therefore scour depth from the spiral TDR sensor agrees very well with that by direct physical measurement. The spiral TDR sensor is four times more sensitive than a traditional straight TDR probe.

[1]  J Lefter,et al.  INSTRUMENTATION FOR MEASURING SCOUR AT BRIDGE PIERS AND ABUTMENTS , 1993 .

[2]  Tsuneji Nagai,et al.  Solubility of Acetaminophen in Cosolvents , 1984 .

[3]  Xinbao Yu,et al.  Experimental Study of an Innovative Bridge Scour Sensor , 2009 .

[4]  Y. Chien,et al.  Solubilization of metronidazole by water-miscible multi-cosolvents and water-soluble vitamins. , 1984, Journal of parenteral science and technology : a publication of the Parenteral Drug Association.

[5]  D. Max Sheppard,et al.  Field performance of an acoustic scour-depth monitoring system , 1994 .

[6]  Hak-Kim Chan,et al.  A simple relationship between dielectric constant of mixed solvents with solvent composition and temperature. , 2004, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[7]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A new time-domain reflectometry bridge scour sensor , 2013 .

[8]  G. Topp,et al.  Measurement of Soil Water Content using Time‐domain Reflectrometry (TDR): A Field Evaluation , 1985 .

[9]  Xuan Kong,et al.  Instrumentation design for bridge scour monitoring using fiber Bragg grating sensors. , 2012, Applied optics.

[10]  X. Yu,et al.  SOIL WATER CONTENT AND DRY DENSITY BY TIME DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY , 2004 .

[11]  C. G. Gardner,et al.  High dielectric constant microwave probes for sensing soil moisture , 1974 .

[12]  Neil Lennart Anderson,et al.  Ground-penetrating radar: A tool for monitoring bridge scour , 2007 .

[13]  Jihn-Sung Lai,et al.  Applications of optical fiber sensor on local scour monitoring , 2004, Proceedings of IEEE Sensors, 2004..

[14]  David Pommerenke,et al.  Real time bridge scour monitoring with magneto-inductive field coupling , 2013, Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[15]  Leonard J. Zabilansky Ice Cover Effects on Bed Scour: Case Studies , 2002 .

[16]  S. Dautrebande,et al.  A method of measuring soil moisture by time-domain reflectometry , 1986 .

[17]  S. C. Mehrotra,et al.  The dielectric relaxation study of 2(2-alkoxyethoxy)ethanol–water mixtures using time domain reflectometry , 2011 .

[18]  Xiong Yu,et al.  Time domain reflectometry for automatic bridge scour monitoring , 2006 .

[19]  Donald C. Hayes,et al.  Use of Fathometers and Electrical-Conductivity Probes to Monitor Riverbed Scour at Bridge Piers , 1995 .

[20]  L. Zabilansky,et al.  LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SYSTEM FOR MONITORING BRIDGE SCOUR , 1999 .

[21]  D. Kosanovic,et al.  Solubilization of ipronidazole by co-solvents , 1992 .

[22]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  Erosion function apparatus for scour rate predictions , 2001 .

[23]  Luke J. Prendergast,et al.  A review of bridge scour monitoring techniques , 2014 .

[24]  Maria Burke Seagrasses under threat , 2004 .

[25]  Fernando De Falco,et al.  The monitoring of bridges for scour by sonar and sedimetri , 2002 .

[26]  Jean-Louis Briaud,et al.  SRICOS-EFA Method for Contraction Scour in Fine-Grained Soils , 2005 .

[27]  Michael B. King,et al.  Use of rational functions for representing data , 1979 .

[28]  J. Tierney,et al.  Microwave assisted organic synthesis-a review , 2001 .

[29]  M. Blake,et al.  Relationship of composition of nonaqueous binary solvent systems and dielectric constant. , 1974, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[30]  Michael Forde,et al.  Radar measurement of bridge scour , 1999 .

[31]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Design and evaluation of a distributed TDR moisture sensor , 2010 .

[32]  Jihn-Sung Lai,et al.  Real-time monitoring of local scour by using fiber Bragg grating sensors , 2005 .