Amputation rehabilitation and prosthetic restoration. From surgery to community reintegration

Purpose: The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature related to the advances that have taken place in the management and rehabilitation care of limb amputation. Results: Prostheses for the lower and upper limb amputee have changed greatly over the past several years, with advances in components, socket fabrication and fitting techniques, suspension systems and sources of power and electronic controls. Higher levels of limb amputation can now be fitted with functional prostheses, which allow more patients to achieve independent life styles. This is of particular importance for the multi-limb amputee. The rehabilitation of more traditional lower limb levels of amputation have also greatly benefited from the technological advances including energy storing feet, electronic control hydraulic knees, ankle rotators and shock absorbers to mention a few. For the upper limb amputee, myoelectric and proportional controlled terminal devices and elbow joints are now used routinely in some rehabilitation facilities. Experimental prosthetic fitting techniques and devices such as the use of osseo-implantation for suspension of the prosthesis, tension control hands or electromagnetic fluids for knee movement control will also be briefly discussed in this paper. Conclusion: It is possible to conclude from this review that many advances have occurred that have greatly impacted the functional outcomes of patients with limb amputation.

[1]  Marie Mendler Upper and Lower Extremity Prostheses , 1962 .

[2]  L. Fleming,et al.  Immediate, early, and late postsurgical management of upper-limb amputation. , 1984, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[3]  Alberto Esquenazi,et al.  Prosthetic Feet and Ankle Mechanisms , 1991 .

[4]  R. H. Meier,et al.  Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 4. Limb amputation. , 1996, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  Three measures of functional outcome for lower limb amputees: A retrospective review , 1998, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[6]  H. Alaranta,et al.  Ten-year survival of Finnish lower limb amputees , 1998, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  F Gottschalk,et al.  Transfemoral amputation. Biomechanics and surgery. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  L. Witte,et al.  Amputees in Limburg: Incidence, morbidity and mortality, prosthetic supply, care utilisation and functional level after one year , 2000, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[9]  C. Payne,et al.  Diabetes‐related lower‐limb amputations in Australia , 2000, The Medical journal of Australia.

[10]  M. Grabois Physical medicine and rehabilitation : the complete approach , 2000 .

[11]  W Daly,et al.  Upper extremity socket design options. , 2000, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[12]  B. Rydevik,et al.  Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation: a review. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Rehabilitation after amputation. , 2001, Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.

[14]  J. Sullivan,et al.  Rehabilitation of the transfemoral amputee with an osseointegrated prosthesis: The United Kingdom experience , 2003, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[15]  Pain Management in Rehabilitation , 2004 .