Embedding an Ecology Notion in the Social Production of Urban Space

This chapter defines, explores and exemplifies research at the intersection of people, place and technology in cities. First we theorise the notion of ecology in the social production of space to continue our response to the quest of making sense of an environment characterised by different stakeholders and actors as well as technical, social and discursive elements that operate across dynamic time and space constraints. Second we describe and rationalise our research approach which is designed to illuminate from three different perspectives the processes at play in the social production of space. We illustrate the application of our model in a discussion of a case study of community networking and community engagement in an Australian urban renewal site. Three specific interventions that are loosely positioned at the exchange of each perspective are then discussed in detail, namely: Sharing Stories; Social Patchwork and History Lines; and City Flocks.

[1]  Brian Whitworth,et al.  Handbook of Research on Socio-Technical Design and Social Networking Systems , 2009 .

[2]  Gustavo S. Mesch,et al.  Community Networking and Locally‐Based Social Ties in Two Suburban Localities , 2003 .

[3]  Peggy Teo,et al.  A sense of place in public housing: A case study of Pasir Ris, Singapore , 1996 .

[4]  Mikael Lind,et al.  The Challenges of Co-Design and the Case of e-ME , 2009 .

[5]  S. Al-Hathloul,et al.  Creating identity in new communities: case studies from Saudi Arabia , 1999 .

[6]  Robert Fisher,et al.  Neither Romance Nor Regulation: Re‐evaluating Community , 2006 .

[7]  J. Sterne Bourdieu, Technique And Technology , 2003 .

[8]  D. Oktay The quest for urban identity in the changing context of the city , 2002 .

[9]  Andy van den Dobbelsteen,et al.  Space use optimisation and sustainability-environmental assessment of space use concepts. , 2004 .

[10]  Henry Sanoff,et al.  Community participation in riverfront development , 2005 .

[11]  M. Gurstein Effective use: A community informatics strategy beyond the Digital Divide , 2003, First Monday.

[12]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Ecologies of Innovation , 2007 .

[13]  B. Wellman Physical Place and Cyberplace: The Rise of Personalized Networking , 2001 .

[14]  Jean Burgess,et al.  Hearing Ordinary Voices: Cultural Studies, Vernacular Creativity and Digital Storytelling , 2006 .

[15]  Malgorzata Hanzl,et al.  Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials , 2007 .

[16]  B. Gleeson Deprogramming planning: Collaboration and inclusion in new urban development , 2004 .

[17]  D. Dillman,et al.  Community Participation, Social Ties, and Use of the Internet , 2006 .

[18]  A. Gilchrist The well-connected community: networking to the edge of chaos , 2000 .

[19]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .

[20]  G. Hearn,et al.  Networked Individualism of Urban Residents: Discovering the communicative ecology in inner-city apartment buildings , 2007 .

[21]  Emily Talen,et al.  Design for Diversity: Evaluating the Context of Socially Mixed Neighbourhoods , 2006 .

[22]  Barbara Adkins,et al.  A Research Design to Build Effective Partnerships between City Planners, Developers, Government and Urban Neighbourhood Communities , 2006, J. Community Informatics.

[23]  Gernot Grabher Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? , 2004 .

[24]  S. Graham,et al.  Variable Geometries of Connection: Urban Digital Divides and the Uses of Information Technology , 2006 .

[25]  B. Gleeson,et al.  Governance, Sustainability and Recent Australian Metropolitan Strategies: A Socio‐theoretic Analysis , 2004 .

[26]  M. Antrop Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe , 2004 .

[27]  Ron Dvir,et al.  Innovation engines for knowledge cities: an innovation ecology perspective , 2004, J. Knowl. Manag..

[28]  Ray Hudson,et al.  Thinking Through the Geographies Of the New Europe in the New Millennium , 2004 .