Querying the web: a multiontology disambiguation method

The lack of explicit semantics in the current Web can lead to ambiguity problems: for example, current search engines return unwanted information since they do not take into account the exact meaning given by user to the keywords used. Though disambiguation is a very well-known problem in Natural Language Processing and other domains, traditional methods are not flexible enough to work in a Web-based context.In this paper we have identified some desirable properties that a Web-oriented disambiguation method should fulfill, and make a proposal according to them. The proposed method processes a set of related keywords in order to discover and extract their implicit semantics, obtaining their most suitable senses according to their context. The possible senses are extracted from the knowledge represented by a pool of ontologies available in the Web. This method applies an iterative disambiguation algorithm that uses a semantic relatedness measure based on Google frequencies. Our proposal makes explicit the semantics of keywords by means of ontology terms; this information can be used for different purposes, such as improving the search and retrieval of underlying relevant information.

[1]  Eduardo Mena,et al.  Ontology-Based Query Processing for Global Information Systems , 2001, The Kluwer international series in engineering and computer science.

[2]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Combining Local Context and Wordnet Similarity for Word Sense Identification , 1998 .

[3]  G. Miller,et al.  Contextual correlates of semantic similarity , 1991 .

[4]  Lluís Màrquez i Villodre,et al.  Boosting Applied to Word Sense Disambiguation , 2000, ArXiv.

[5]  Eduardo Mena,et al.  Searching the Web: from keywords to semantic queries , 2005, Third International Conference on Information Technology and Applications (ICITA'05).

[6]  Max J. Egenhofer,et al.  Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng..

[7]  Ted Pedersen,et al.  Maximizing Semantic Relatedness to Perform Word Sense Disambiguation , 2005 .

[8]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[9]  Clement T. Yu,et al.  Word sense disambiguation in queries , 2005, CIKM '05.

[10]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[11]  Lluís Màrquez i Villodre,et al.  Boosting Applied toe Word Sense Disambiguation , 2000, ECML.

[12]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  Ontology-Based Semantic Online Classification of Documents : Supporting Users in Searching the Web , 2004 .

[13]  David Yarowsky,et al.  Unsupervised Word Sense Disambiguation Rivaling Supervised Methods , 1995, ACL.

[14]  Michael E. Lesk,et al.  Automatic sense disambiguation using machine readable dictionaries: how to tell a pine cone from an ice cream cone , 1986, SIGDOC '86.

[15]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[16]  Yun Peng,et al.  Swoogle: Searching for Knowledge on the Semantic Web , 2005, AAAI.

[17]  Graeme Hirst,et al.  Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures , 2004 .

[18]  Amit P. Sheth,et al.  Semantics for the Semantic Web: The Implicit, the Formal and the Powerful , 2005, Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst..

[19]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  Automatic Meaning Discovery Using Google , 2006, Kolmogorov Complexity and Applications.

[20]  Philip Resnik,et al.  Disambiguating Noun Groupings with Respect to Wordnet Senses , 1995, VLC@ACL.