A model of Cummings and Foreman revisited
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Richard Laver,et al. Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing , 1978 .
[2] Menachem Magidor,et al. Reflecting stationary sets , 1982, Journal of Symbolic Logic.
[3] James Cummings,et al. The Tree Property , 1998 .
[4] Spencer Unger,et al. Aronszajn trees and the successors of a singular cardinal , 2013, Arch. Math. Log..
[5] Laura Fontanella. Strong tree properties for small cardinals , 2013, J. Symb. Log..
[6] James Cummings,et al. Squares, scales and stationary Reflection , 2001, J. Math. Log..
[7] James Cummings,et al. Notes on Singular Cardinal Combinatorics , 2005, Notre Dame J. Formal Log..
[8] Saharon Shelah,et al. SOME INDEPENDENCE RESULTS ON REFLECTION , 1997 .
[9] Saharon Shelah,et al. Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals , 1991, Arch. Math. Log..
[10] C. Weiß. Subtle and Ineffable Tree Properties , 2010 .
[11] Itay Neeman. The Tree Property up to אω+1 , 2014, J. Symb. Log..
[12] M. Magidor. Combinatorial characterization of supercompact cardinals , 1974 .
[13] William Mitchell,et al. Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property , 1972 .
[14] Saharon Shelah,et al. On Successors of Singular Cardinals , 1979 .
[15] R. Jensen,et al. The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy , 1972 .