Performance Analysis of Seamless Handover in Mobile IPv6-based Cellular Networks

The commercial proliferation of cellular voice and data service has placed a new challenge for mobile communication systems. Next-generation wireless systems are envisioned to have an all-IP-based infrastructure with the support of heterogeneous access technologies (Akyildiz et al., 2004). Under the circumstance, the Internet Protocol (IP) is selected as the common interconnection protocol to integrate disparate wireless systems, so that mobile users can roam among multiple wireless networks, regardless of the underlying different radio access technologies (Akyildiz et al., 2005; Makaya & Pierre, 2008; Mohanty & Xie, 2007). However, with the advent of new value-added services (video-conference, multimedia streaming, etc.) and novel concepts introduced into Long Term Evolution (LTE) architecture of the 4th Generation (4G) networks, provisioning efficient mobilitymanagement with quality of service guarantees and seamless handoff feature become even more important for next-generation wireless network design. Generally, mobility management allows mobile communication systems to locate roaming terminals for voice/data delivery as well as maintaining network connectivity when the terminal moves into a new service area (Akyildiz et al., 1999). Typically, such process contains two aspects: location management and handoff management (Quintero et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010). Location management enables telecommunication systems to find out the network attachment points of roaming nodes for call/data delivery. It usually contains two components: location update and call delivery (or data delivery). The former requires mobile nodes to provide the system with their location information, while the latter indicates that the system is queried for the location information of specific mobile nodes, and then services are delivered to them while they are away from their home network (Zhang et al., 2010). Handoff management aims to maintain network connectivity when mobile nodes change their network attachment points or access points. Obviously, handoff protocols need to preservemobile users’ network connectivity as they move from one network to another, while simultaneously reducing disruption to the ongoing call/data sessions. Therefore, reducing handoff delay and maximizing session continuity are always the primary goals of handoff management (Dimopoulou et al., 2005). Generally, handoff seamlessness means lower packet Performance Analysis of Seamless Handover in Mobile IPv6-based Cellular Networks 13

[1]  Iakovos S. Venieris,et al.  Fast handover support in a WLAN environment: challenges and perspectives , 2005, IEEE Network.

[2]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6) , 1998, RFC.

[3]  Claude Castelluccia,et al.  Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 (HMIPv6) Mobility Management , 2008, RFC.

[4]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 1996, RFC.

[5]  Victor O. K. Li Next-generation wireless networks , 2002, SPIE/OSA/IEEE Asia Communications and Photonics.

[6]  James Kempf,et al.  Scalability and robustness analysis of mobile IPv6, fast mobile IPv6, hierarchical mobile IPv6, and hybrid IPv6 mobility protocols using a large-scale simulation , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Communications (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37577).

[7]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  An Architecture for Seamless Mobility Support in IP-Based Next-Generation Wireless Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[8]  Hossam S. Hassanein,et al.  Handoffs in fourth generation heterogeneous networks , 2006, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[9]  Thierry Ernst,et al.  Network Mobility Support Terminology , 2007, RFC.

[10]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support , 1996, RFC.

[11]  Alejandro Quintero,et al.  An alternative strategy for location update and paging in mobile networks , 2004, Comput. Commun..

[12]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 1996, RFC.

[13]  Chieh-Yih Wan,et al.  Comparison of IP micromobility protocols , 2002, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[14]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A simulation study on the performance of Mobile IPv6 in a WLAN-based cellular network , 2002, Comput. Networks.

[15]  Agassi Melikov Cellular Networks - Positioning, Performance Analysis, Reliability , 2011 .

[16]  Janise McNair,et al.  Vertical handoffs in fourth-generation multinetwork environments , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[17]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  A Survey of IP Layer Mobility Management Protocols in Next Generation Wireless Networks , 2011 .

[18]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Mobility Management in Next Generation Wireless Systems , 1999, ICCCN.

[19]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[20]  Stephen T. Kent,et al.  IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) , 1995, RFC.

[21]  Randall J. Atkinson,et al.  IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP) , 1995, RFC.

[22]  Yanghee Choi,et al.  Performance analysis of hierarchical mobile IPv6 in IP-based cellular networks , 2003, 14th IEEE Proceedings on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2003. PIMRC 2003..

[23]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  A comparison of ip micro-mobility protocols , 2001 .

[24]  Rajeev Koodli,et al.  Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2008, RFC.

[25]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP version 6 (IPv6) , 2007, RFC.

[26]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A dynamic location management scheme for next-generation multitier PCS systems , 2002, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[27]  Thomas Narten,et al.  IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration , 2007, RFC.

[28]  Arturo Azcorra,et al.  Nemo-enabled localized mobility support for internet access in automotive scenarios , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[29]  Jiang Xie,et al.  Performance analysis of a novel architecture to integrate heterogeneous wireless systems , 2007, Comput. Networks.

[30]  Jukka Manner,et al.  Mobility Related Terminology , 2004, RFC.

[31]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A survey of mobility management in next-generation all-IP-based wireless systems , 2004, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[32]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  Mobility Management Protocols Design for IPv6-Based Wireless and Mobile Networks , 2010 .

[33]  Ahmad Faris Ismail,et al.  Handoff latency analysis of mobile IPv6 protocol variations , 2007, Comput. Commun..

[34]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  HAWAII: a domain-based approach for supporting mobility in wide-area wireless networks , 2002, Proceedings. Seventh International Conference on Network Protocols.

[35]  Basavaraj Patil,et al.  Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2008, RFC.

[36]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  A ubiquitous mobile communication architecture for next-generation heterogeneous wireless systems , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[37]  Ryuji Wakikawa,et al.  Network Mobility (NEMO) Basic Support Protocol , 2005, RFC.

[38]  Alper Yegin,et al.  Enhanced forwarding from the previous care-of address (EFWD) for fast handovers in mobile IPv6 , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[39]  Thomas Narten,et al.  Neighbor Discovery for IP Version 6 (IPv6) , 1996, RFC.

[40]  Jari Arkko,et al.  Enhanced Route Optimization for Mobile IPv6 , 2007, RFC.

[41]  Jonathan Wood,et al.  Fast mobile IPv6 handover packet loss performance: measurement for emulated real time traffic , 2003, 2003 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, 2003. WCNC 2003..

[42]  Miae Woo Performance Analysis of Mobile IP Regional Registration , 2003 .

[43]  Heeyoung Jung,et al.  A Scheme for Supporting Fast Handover in Hierarchical Mobile IPv6 Networks , 2005 .

[44]  Andrew T. Campbell,et al.  P-MIP: Paging Extensions for Mobile IP , 2002, Mob. Networks Appl..

[45]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[46]  Hannes Hartenstein,et al.  A performance comparison of Mobile IPv6, Hierarchical Mobile IPv6, fast handovers for Mobile IPv6 and their combination , 2003, MOCO.

[47]  András Gergely Valkó,et al.  Cellular IP: a new approach to Internet host mobility , 1999, CCRV.

[48]  Samuel Pierre,et al.  Evaluating the Performance of Fast Handover for Hierarchical MIPv6 in Cellular Networks , 2008, J. Networks.