Factors Influencing Pulse Width of Small Footprint, Full Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data

Small footprint, full waveform airborne laser scanning provides the opportunity to derive high-resolution geometric and physical information simultaneously from a single scanner system. This study evaluates the influence of various factors on the shape of the returned waveform and investigates the possibility of improving terrain classification by applying waveform-derived information. The factors discussed are surface roughness, slope angle, scan angle, amplitude, and footprint size. It is statistically demonstrated that roughness is the most significant factor affecting pulse width, and that, over relatively smooth surfaces, there is no significant variation in pulse width behavior resulting from different footprint sizes. Pulse width also exhibits a relatively stable behavior when amplitude, range distance, or scan angle vary substantially. The overall accuracy of classification achieved by applying pulse width information over all the different land-cover types examined in this study (including scrub, hillside, single trees, and forest areas) was greater than 85 percent, with >94 percent achieved for open vegetation areas. Physical surface information provided by small footprint waveform data is considered to be at the microscale, therefore it is recommended to combine such information with geometry (e.g., filtering algorithms) for the optimal identification of terrain points.

[1]  Åsa Persson,et al.  Identifying species of individual trees using airborne laser scanner , 2004 .

[2]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Review of methods of small‐footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests , 2008 .

[3]  John Trinder,et al.  Building detection by fusion of airborne laser scanner data and multi-spectral images : Performance evaluation and sensitivity analysis , 2007 .

[4]  J. Bryan Blair,et al.  Decomposition of laser altimeter waveforms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  N. Pfeifer GEOMETRICAL ASPECTS OF AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING AND TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2007 .

[6]  F. Ackermann Airborne laser scanning : present status and future expectations , 1999 .

[7]  J. Means Use of Large-Footprint Scanning Airborne Lidar To Estimate Forest Stand Characteristics in the Western Cascades of Oregon , 1999 .

[8]  W. Walker,et al.  Mapping forest structure for wildlife habitat analysis using multi-sensor (LiDAR, SAR/InSAR, ETM+, Quickbird) synergy , 2006 .

[9]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[10]  J. Reitberger,et al.  Analysis of full waveform LIDAR data for the classification of deciduous and coniferous trees , 2008 .

[11]  G. Vosselman ON THE ESTIMATION OF PLANIMETRIC OFFSETS IN LASER ALTIMETRY DATA , 2002 .

[12]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[13]  Juan C. Suárez,et al.  Use of airborne LiDAR and aerial photography in the estimation of individual tree heights in forestry , 2005, Comput. Geosci..

[14]  C. Briese,et al.  Archaeological prospection of forested areas using full-waveform airborne laser scanning , 2008 .

[15]  Chester S. Gardner,et al.  Ranging performance of satellite laser altimeters , 1992, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[16]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Forestry , 2000, Journal of Forestry.

[17]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[18]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[19]  Martin Flood,et al.  LIDAR ACTIVITIES AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN THE COMMERCIAL SECTOR , 2004 .

[20]  Sorin C. Popescu,et al.  Mapping surface fuel models using lidar and multispectral data fusion for fire behavior , 2008 .

[21]  W. Wagner,et al.  Gaussian decomposition and calibration of a novel small-footprint full-waveform digitising airborne laser scanner , 2006 .

[22]  Markus Hollaus,et al.  Object-Based Point Cloud Analysis of Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Urban Vegetation Classification , 2008, Sensors.

[23]  W. Wagner,et al.  3D vegetation mapping using small‐footprint full‐waveform airborne laser scanners , 2008 .

[24]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[25]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  A Comprehensive Automated 3D Approach for Building Extraction, Reconstruction, and Regularization from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds , 2008, Sensors.

[26]  N. Pfeifer,et al.  Correction of laser scanning intensity data: Data and model-driven approaches , 2007 .

[27]  Franz Rottensteiner,et al.  Automatic Generation of High-Quality Building Models from Lidar Data , 2003, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.