Closed Cell Systems for In Situ TEM with Gas Environments Ranging from 0.1 to 5 Bar

The ability to carry out reactions with gas mixtures in a TEM is becoming an increasingly important field of study, known as environmental transmission electron microscopy (ETEM). Different approaches exist to expose the material to a gas while imaging in a TEM: an open system employing differential pumping and a closed system using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). The latter approach using electron transparent windows in a device holding the specimen and the gas came up during the last decade, enabling a gas pressure of several bars. Here, we present this closed cell approach based on a functional MEMS device known as “nanoreactor” to investigate gas–material interactions inside a TEM. We discuss the design and the development of different kinds of nanoreactors, along with the necessary accessories to carry out drift-stabilized, atomic-resolution environmental TEM studies. Finally, examples showing the applications of the nanoreactor to investigate several gas–liquid–material interactions are presented.

[1]  Arndt Jenichen,et al.  Metal-organic chemical vapour deposition of (BInGa)P: Density-functional calculations to the mechanisms , 2009 .

[2]  D. Peckys,et al.  Practical Aspects of Transmission Electron Microscopy in Liquid , 2014 .

[3]  J. F. Creemer,et al.  Visualization of oscillatory behaviour of Pt nanoparticles catalysing CO oxidation. , 2014, Nature materials.

[4]  J. F. Creemer,et al.  Atomic-scale electron microscopy at ambient pressure. , 2008, Ultramicroscopy.

[5]  Derek O. Northwood,et al.  Hysteresis in metal-hydrogen systems: a critical review of the experimental observations and theoretical models , 1988 .

[6]  F. Banhart,et al.  Irradiation effects in carbon nanostructures , 1999 .

[7]  Tuncay Alan,et al.  In-situ TEM on (de)hydrogenation of Pd at 0.5-4.5 bar hydrogen pressure and 20-400°C. , 2012, Ultramicroscopy.

[8]  Zhennan Gu,et al.  Temperature dependence of the Raman spectra of carbon nanotubes , 1998 .

[9]  T. R. Hart,et al.  Temperature Dependence of Raman Scattering in Silicon , 1970 .

[10]  P. Batson,et al.  Formation of nanopores in a SiN/SiO2 membrane with an electron beam , 2005 .

[11]  Niels de Jonge,et al.  Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. , 2011, Nature nanotechnology.

[12]  S. Aloni,et al.  In situ TEM imaging of CaCO3 nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways , 2014, Science.

[13]  F. Tichelaar,et al.  Localised corrosion in aluminium alloy 2024-T3 using in situ TEM. , 2013, Chemical communications.

[14]  Oliver Paul,et al.  Micro-fabricated channel with ultra-thin yet ultra-strong windows enables electron microscopy under 4-bar pressure , 2012 .

[15]  O. Tabata,et al.  Specimen size effect on tensile strength of surface-micromachined polycrystalline silicon thin films , 1998 .

[16]  Alfons van Blaaderen,et al.  Core–shell reconfiguration through thermal annealing in FexO/CoFe2O4 ordered 2D nanocrystal arrays , 2014, Nanotechnology.

[17]  Robert Hull,et al.  Quantification of electron–phonon scattering for determination of temperature variations at high spatial resolution in the transmission electron microscope , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[18]  J. F. Creemer,et al.  An all-in-one nanoreactor for high-resolution microscopy on nanomaterials at high pressures , 2011, 2011 IEEE 24th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems.

[19]  Chennupati Jagadish,et al.  Structural characteristics of GaSb∕GaAs nanowire heterostructures grown by metal-organic chemical vapor deposition , 2006 .

[20]  Henny W. Zandbergen,et al.  Atomic-Scale Electron-Beam Sculpting of Defect-Free Graphene Nanostructures , 2011, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[21]  Pasqualina M. Sarro,et al.  A comparative study of the strength of Si, SiN and SiC used at nanoscales , 2007 .

[22]  Leyla Soleymani,et al.  In Situ Liquid Cell TEM Study of Morphological Evolution and Degradation of Pt–Fe Nanocatalysts During Potential Cycling , 2014 .

[23]  Peter C Searson,et al.  Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth of nanoscale clusters using real-time kinetic data. , 2006, Nano letters.

[24]  Daan Hein Alsem,et al.  In Situ TEM Study of Catalytic Nanoparticle Reactions in Atmospheric Pressure Gas Environment , 2013, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[25]  J. Nieto,et al.  The selective oxidation of propane on Mo-V-Te-Nb-O catalysts: The influence of Te-precursor , 2003 .

[26]  Oliver Paul,et al.  Thin‐Film Characterization Using the Bulge Test , 2007 .

[27]  C. Dekker,et al.  Fabrication of solid-state nanopores with single-nanometre precision , 2003, Nature materials.

[28]  M. Malac,et al.  Radiation damage in the TEM and SEM. , 2004, Micron.

[29]  Oliver Paul,et al.  Characterization of Ultrathin Membranes to Enable TEM Observation of Gas Reactions at High Pressures , 2009 .

[30]  Grégory Pandraud,et al.  Atomic-scale electron-beam sculpting of near-defect-free graphene nanostructures. , 2011, Nano letters.

[31]  Majid Beidaghi,et al.  In situ environmental transmission electron microscopy study of oxidation of two-dimensional Ti3C2 and formation of carbon-supported TiO2 , 2014 .

[32]  A. Kirkland,et al.  Transformations of gold nanoparticles investigated using variable temperature high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. , 2010, Ultramicroscopy.

[33]  Alan T. Zehnder,et al.  Effect of surface morphology on the fracture strength of silicon nanobeams , 2006 .

[34]  Jie Gao,et al.  Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. , 2013, Nano letters.

[35]  Arturo Martínez-Arias,et al.  Dynamic in situ observation of rapid size and shape change of supported Pd nanoparticles during CO/NO cycling. , 2007, Nature materials.