Methane emissions from 20 landfills across the United States using vertical radial plume mapping

Landfill fugitive methane emissions were quantified as a function of climate type and cover type at 20 landfills using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Other Test Method (OTM)-10 vertical radial plume mapping (VRPM) with tunable diode lasers (TDLs). The VRPM data were initially collected as g CH4/sec emission rates and subsequently converted to g CH4/m2/day rates using two recently published approaches. The first was based upon field tracer releases of methane or acetylene and multiple linear regression analysis (MLRM). The second was a virtual computer model that was based upon the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) and Pasquill plume stability class models (PSCMs). Calculated emission results in g CH4/m2/day for each measured VRPM with the two approaches agreed well (r 2 = 0.93). The VRPM data were obtained from the working face, temporary soil, intermediate soil, and final soil or synthetic covers. The data show that methane emissions to the atmosphere are a function of climate and cover type. Humid subtropical climates exhibited the highest emissions for all cover types at 207, 127, 102, and 32 g CH4/m2/day, for working face (no cover), temporary, intermediate, and final cover, respectively. Humid continental warm summers showed 67, 51, and 27 g CH4/m2/day for temporary, intermediate, and final covers. Humid continental cool summers were 135, 40, and 26 g CH4/m2/day for the working face, intermediate, and final covers. Mediterranean climates were examined for intermediate and final covers only and found to be 11 and 6 g CH4/m2/day, respectively, whereas semiarid climates showed 85, 11, 3.7, and 2.7 g CH4/m2/day for working face, temporary, intermediate, and final covers. A closed, synthetically capped landfill covered with soil and vegetation with a gas collection system in a humid continental warm summer climate gave mostly background methane readings and average emission rates of only 0.09 g CH4/m2/day flux when measurable. Implications The OTM-10 method is being proposed by EPA to quantify surface methane emissions from landfill covers. This study of 20 landfills across the United States was done to determine the efficacy of using OTM-10 for this purpose. Two recently published models were used to evaluate the methane flux results found with VRPM optical remote sensing. The results should provide a sense of the practicality of the method, its limitations at landfills, and the impact of climate upon the cover's methane flux. Measured field data may assist landfill owners in refining previously modeled methane emission factor default values.

[1]  J. Bogner,et al.  Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems? , 2006, Waste management.

[2]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[3]  J. Chanton,et al.  Landfill methane oxidation across climate types in the U.S. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Tarek Abichou,et al.  Methane flux and oxidation at two types of intermediate landfill covers. , 2006, Waste management.

[5]  Morton A Barlaz,et al.  Controls on Landfill Gas Collection Efficiency: Instantaneous and Lifetime Performance , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[6]  N. Mohindra,et al.  Scientific basis , 2005, British Dental Journal.

[7]  Edgar L. Thompson,et al.  PLANE-INTEGRATED OPEN-PATH FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROMETRY METHODOLOGY FOR ANAEROBIC SWINE LAGOON EMISSION MEASUREMENTS , 2005 .

[8]  Thomas Lagier,et al.  Fugitive Methane Emissions from Landfills: Field Comparison of Five Methods on a French Landfill , 2010 .

[9]  B. Galle,et al.  Measurements of methane emissions from landfills using a time correlation tracer method based on FTIR absorption spectroscopy. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  Joanne H. Shorter,et al.  Landfill methane emissions measured by enclosure and atmospheric tracer methods , 1996 .

[11]  Ram A. Hashmonay,et al.  Development of EPA OTM 10 for Landfill Applications , 2010 .

[12]  Debra R. Reinhart,et al.  Landfill Bioreactor Design and Operation , 1997 .

[13]  Jean E. Bogner,et al.  Landfill CH4: Rates, fates, and role in global carbon cycle , 1993 .

[14]  T. Abichou,et al.  Characterization of Methane Flux and Oxidation at a Solid Waste Landfill , 2006 .

[15]  Uncertainties Associated with the Use of Optical Remote Sensing Technique to Estimate Surface Emissions in Landfill Applications , 2010, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[16]  M G Yost,et al.  Innovative approach for estimating fugitive gaseous fluxes using computed tomography and remote optical sensing techniques. , 1999, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[17]  J. Chanton,et al.  Methane oxidation in landfill cover soils, is a 10% default value reasonable? , 2009, Journal of environmental quality.

[18]  P Kjeldsen,et al.  Quantification of multiple methane emission sources at landfills using a double tracer technique. , 2011, Waste management.

[19]  A. Alexander,et al.  Landfill Gas Emissions Model (LandGEM) Version 3.02 User's Guide , 2005 .