Relevancy of the Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) about Sustainable Energy for Adolescents

Sustainable energy is one of the biggest global challenges today. This paper discusses how we can promote adolescents’ learning of sustainable energy with the help of an international massive open online course (MOOC). The aim of this case study is to understand: (i) What do the adolescents find relevant in the MOOC course about sustainable energy? and (ii) What are the opportunities and challenges of the MOOC for the adolescents to learn sustainable energy? In our study, 80 voluntary adolescents around the world, who were at least 15 year old, took part in two surveys. The themes of our MOOC course were, e.g., sustainable growth, solar power, wind power, biofuel production and smart power generation. This 38 work-hour, free of charge, online course includes an introduction video, interviews of specialists, lecture videos, reading materials of the newest research and multiple choice questions on the topics. Research data was classified by using content analysis. The study indicates that adolescents feel that both the MOOC course and sustainable energy as a subject are relevant to them. Their decision to take part in an online course was mostly influenced by individual relevance and partly influenced by both societal and vocational relevance, according to the relevancy theory used. The MOOC was experienced to be relevant for the three following reasons: (i) good content (e.g., energy production) and implementation of the course; (ii) the course makes it possible to study in a new way; and (iii) the course is personally useful. The characteristics of the MOOC, such as being available anywhere and anytime, free access, and online learning, bringing out a flexible, new way of learning and thus promoting Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in the context of sustainable energy at school level around the world. This MOOC provided the school students with choice-based learning and expanded their learning opportunities in understanding sustainable energy. In the designing of MOOCs for studying sustainable energy, it is important to take the following things into consideration: (i) the balance between theory and practical examples; (ii) the support for interaction; and (iii) other support (e.g., technical and learning strategies) for students. Communication with other learners and getting feedback from teachers and tutors remain the vital challenges for the developers of MOOCs in the future.

[1]  Donna King.  New perspectives on context-based chemistry education: using a dialectical sociocultural approach to view teaching and learning , 2012 .

[2]  Molly Goldwasser,et al.  Fulfilling the promise: do MOOCs reach the educationally underserved? , 2015 .

[3]  Robert Schuwer,et al.  Institutional MOOC strategies in Europe , 2015 .

[4]  J. Gilbert.  On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education , 2006 .

[5]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future , 2012, Nature.

[6]  Judith Ramsay,et al.  Massive open online courses (MOOCs): Insights and challenges from a psychological perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[7]  Maha Bali,et al.  MOOC Pedagogy: Gleaning Good Practice from Existing MOOCs , 2014 .

[8]  Martin Ebner,et al.  A STEM MOOC for school children — What does learning analytics tell us? , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL).

[9]  M. Aksela,et al.  Toward citizenship science education: what students do to make the world a better place? , 2016 .

[10]  B. Venkataraman.  Education for Sustainable Development , 2009 .

[11]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[12]  Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou.  Exploring adolescents’ knowledge, perceptions and attitudes towards Renewable Energy Sources: A colour choice approach , 2016 .

[13]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[14]  George E. DeBoer,et al.  Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform , 2000 .

[15]  T. Lyons,et al.  Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ experiences of school science in their own words , 2006 .

[16]  Hu Mei,et al.  Sustainability Education in Massive Open Online Courses: A Content Analysis Approach , 2015 .

[17]  George Siemens,et al.  The MOOC model for digital practice , 2010 .

[18]  Douglas P. Newton.  Relevance and science education , 1988 .

[19]  Decision Making and Use of Evidence in a Socio-scientific Problem on Air Quality , 2011 .

[20]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  Designing effective MOOCs , 2015 .

[21]  Rachel Mamlok-Naaman,et al.  The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum , 2013 .

[22]  J. Keller.  Motivational Design of Instruction , 1983 .

[23]  Maija Aksela,et al.  Education for sustainable development in chemistry – challenges, possibilities and pedagogical models in Finland and elsewhere , 2014 .

[24]  M. Aksela,et al.  Important Social and Academic Interactions in Supporting Gifted Youth in Non-Formal Education , 2013 .

[25]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  High-school chemistry teaching through environmentally oriented curricula , 2012 .

[26]  Joyce Chao-chen Chen,et al.  Opportunities And Challenges of MOOCS: Perspectives From Asia , 2013 .

[27]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Perspectives on MOOC quality : An account of the EFQUEL MOOC Quality Project , 2014 .

[28]  G. Haan,et al.  The BLK "21" Programme In Germany: A "Gestaltungskompetenz"-Based Model For Education For Sustainable Development. , 2006 .

[29]  Judith M. Ramsden.  Mission impossible?: Can anything be done about attitudes to science? , 1998 .

[31]  Jaakko Kurhila,et al.  A Purposeful MOOC to Alleviate Insufficient CS Education in Finnish Schools , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Educ..

[32]  George Siemens,et al.  What public media reveals about MOOCs: A systematic analysis of news reports , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[33]  Ebba Ossiannilsson,et al.  Analysis of MOOCs practices from the perspective of learner experiences and quality culture , 2015 .

[34]  Shirley Williams,et al.  MOOCs: A systematic study of the published literature 2008-2012 , 2013 .

[35]  Joke Van Aalsvoort.  Activity theory as a tool to address the problem of chemistry's lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education , 2004 .

[36]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Industrial Chemistry and School Chemistry: Making chemistry studies more relevant , 2006 .