A Method to Measure Cervical Spine Motion Over Extended Periods of Time

Study Design. System validation study. Objective. To develop and validate a motion sensor system for measuring cervical spine motion over extended time periods. Summary of Background Data. Many studies using different methodologies have tried to estimate cervical spine motion. These have mostly been carried out in a laboratory setting performing active/passive range of motion or activities of daily living. However, cervical spine performance over extended periods of time in natural environments remains unknown. Methods. A novel motion sensor system, Wisconsin Analysis of Spine Motion Performance (WASP), was validated using 2 benchmarks: a materials testing machine (MTS) and optical motion tracking laboratory. Parameters tested included drift, frequency response, accuracy, effect of sensor orientation, and coupled motions. Applied motions from the MTS and measured motions in subject volunteers under various conditions were compared with WASP using correlation coefficients. Intersubject and intrasubject variability analyses for WASP were also performed. Results. The average WASP slopes for accuracy (compared with MTS) in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were 0.89, 0.93, and 0.38, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.99 in all cases. Compared with optical motion tracking, the WASP regression slopes were 1.1, 1.02, and 0.4 and the correlation coefficients were 0.98, 0.92, and 0.93 in the 3 axes of motion. Coupled motion was noted during all subject motions. WASP peak detection algorithm had a 0% error discounting boundary conditions. Conclusion. WASP was accurate in flexion-extension and lateral bending. In axial rotation, WASP was less accurate. However, the system was highly reliable with low intersubject and intrasubject variability. WASP can be used in estimating cervical spine motion with high reliability while keeping in mind the decreased accuracy in measuring axial rotation.

[1]  P. Fransson,et al.  Primary and Coupled Cervical Movements: The Effect of Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index. A 3-Dimensional Movement Analysis of a Population Without Symptoms of Neck Disorders , 2006, Spine.

[2]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Measurement of human daily physical activity. , 2003, Obesity research.

[3]  R. Oboe,et al.  Control of a Z-axis MEMS vibrational gyroscope , 2004, The 8th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2004. AMC '04..

[4]  Curtis F. Gerald,et al.  APPLIED NUMERICAL ANALYSIS , 1972, The Mathematical Gazette.

[5]  S. Colachis,et al.  Cervical spine motion in normal women: radiographic study of effect of cervical collars. , 1973, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Improving energy expenditure estimation for physical activity. , 2004, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[7]  V. Feipel,et al.  Global 3D head-trunk kinematics during cervical spine manipulation at different levels. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Theodosios Pavlidis,et al.  Segmentation of Plane Curves , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[9]  R Vanderby,et al.  Cervical stability after foraminotomy. A biomechanical in vitro analysis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Kuan Zhang,et al.  Assessment of human locomotion by using an insole measurement system and artificial neural networks. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  H. van Mameren,et al.  Cervical spine motion in the sagittal plane (I) range of motion of actually performed movements, an X-ray cinematographic study. , 1990, European journal of morphology.

[12]  P. Szulc,et al.  The range of motion of the cervical spine in children aged from 3 to 7 years - an electrogoniometric study. , 2003, Folia morphologica.

[13]  V Feipel,et al.  Normal global motion of the cervical spine: an electrogoniometric study. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  W. Castro,et al.  Noninvasive three-dimensional analysis of cervical spine motion in normal subjects in relation to age and sex. An experimental examination. , 2000, Spine.

[15]  M. Wimmer,et al.  Wear particles. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  K A Kuhlman,et al.  Cervical range of motion in the elderly. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Sun,et al.  Patterns of physical activity in free-living adults in the Southern United States , 2004, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[18]  M. Dow,et al.  Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer. , 1959, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  S. Colachis,et al.  Radiographic studies of cervical spine motion in normal subjects: flexion and hyperextension. , 1965, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  Andrew Holmes,et al.  The Range and Nature of Flexion‐Extension Motion in the Cervical Spine , 1994, Spine.

[21]  J Dvorak,et al.  Age and Gender Related Normal Motion of the Cervical Spine , 1992, Spine.

[22]  S. Bennett,et al.  Active Range of Motion Utilized in the Cervical Spine to Perform Daily Functional Tasks , 2002, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[23]  Skowlund Hv,et al.  Study of normal range of motion in the neck utilizing a bubble goniometer. , 1959 .

[24]  A. Mannion,et al.  Range of global motion of the cervical spine: intraindividual reliability and the influence of measurement device , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[25]  J. Archard Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces , 1953 .