Sustainable building renovation for an ageing population: Decision support system through an integral assessment method of architectural interventions

Abstract One of the global challenges of the 21 st century is to guarantee adequate residential conditions for the ageing population, by regenerating obsolete urban environments. In addition to compliance with environmental policies through energy retrofitting, a sustainable urban renovation process involves ensuring optimal conditions in security, habitability, and comfort through residential adaptation to the new requirements. This research develops a new method for the analysis and decision-making process in residential retrofitting. This is an open and flexible methodology that has been applied in three reference case studies in Spain and Portugal. Starting from a technical and social diagnosis, the set of measures is analysed through multiple sustainable issues, structured into four main blocks: Technical Requirements and Peoples demands; Constructive Process; Social benefits; and Economic revaluation. The results show the overall and detailed assessment of each measure, and a cost-benefit ratio, which informs the promoter as to ascertain the benefits and drawbacks of each measure. There are measures that exceed 80% of the maximum benefit and achieve an integral revaluation of the property value, as well as measures that exceed 50% of the benefit with investments of less than 1,000 € per dwelling, thereby achieving significant improvement in their quality of life.

[1]  A. Heylighen,et al.  How architectural design affords experiences of freedom in residential care for older people. , 2017, Journal of aging studies.

[2]  Lynne Mitchell,et al.  Good places for ageing in place: development of objective built environment measures for investigating links with older people's wellbeing , 2011, BMC public health.

[3]  Carlos Henggeler Antunes,et al.  A comparison between cost optimality and return on investment for energy retrofit in buildings-A real options perspective , 2016 .

[4]  Angela Santangelo,et al.  Occupant behaviour and building renovation of the social housing stock: Current and future challenges , 2017 .

[5]  M. Cutchin,et al.  Processes of developing 'community livability' in older age. , 2016, Journal of aging studies.

[6]  O. Robinson,et al.  Wellbeing in retirement villages: eudaimonic challenges and opportunities. , 2014, Journal of aging studies.

[7]  Yiik Diew Wong,et al.  Mobility of the elderly in densely populated neighbourhoods in Singapore , 2015 .

[8]  J. Ortúzar,et al.  Towards a sustainable city: Applying urban renewal incentives according to the social and urban characteristics of the area , 2017 .

[9]  C. Stephens,et al.  Ageing in Unsuitable Places , 2016 .

[10]  Jesús Lizana,et al.  Multi-criteria assessment for the effective decision management in residential energy retrofitting , 2016 .

[11]  H. Wallbaum,et al.  Socio-economic impact of renovation and energy retrofitting of the Gothenburg building stock , 2016 .

[12]  Karin Wendin,et al.  Population ageing in Europé : Facts, implications and policies , 2014 .

[13]  C. Thomson,et al.  Establishing an evidence base for adapting social housing for an ageing population , 2016 .

[14]  P. Vasara Not ageing in place: Negotiating meanings of residency in age-related housing. , 2015, Journal of aging studies.

[15]  Marta Molina Huelva,et al.  {Re} Programa. (Re)habitation + (Re)generation + (Re)programming. The recycling and the sustainable management of the Andalusian housing stock. Management of habitable surroundings from the criteria of active aging, gender and urban habitability. , 2015 .

[16]  Alhassan G. Abdul-Muhmin,et al.  Housing preferences and attribute importance among low-income consumers in Saudi Arabia , 2010 .

[17]  Á. B. Padura,et al.  Dwelling conditions and life satisfaction of older people through residential satisfaction , 2017 .

[18]  Paola Caputo,et al.  Overcoming the inertia of building energy retrofit at municipal level: The Italian challenge , 2015 .

[19]  Per Anker Jensen,et al.  Value based building renovation - A tool for decision-making and evaluation , 2015 .

[20]  Antonio Serrano-Jiménez,et al.  Towards a feasible strategy in Mediterranean building renovation through a multidisciplinary approach , 2017 .

[21]  Paul Higgs,et al.  The Impact of Age, Place, Aging in Place, and Attachment to Place on the Well-Being of the Over 50s in England , 2007 .

[22]  J. J. McArthur,et al.  Portfolio retrofit evaluation: A methodology for optimizing a large number of building retrofits to achieve triple-bottom-line objectives , 2016 .

[23]  J. Salom,et al.  Climate change and building ageing impact on building energy performance and mitigation measures application:A case study in Turin, northern Italy , 2016 .

[24]  S. Corgnati,et al.  Use of reference buildings to assess the energy saving potentials of the residential building stock: the experience of TABULA Project , 2014 .

[25]  Katrin Grossmann,et al.  Challenges for large housing estates in light of population decline and ageing: Results of a long-term survey in East Germany , 2013 .

[26]  Ángela Barrios Padura,et al.  Retrofitting of homes for people in fuel poverty: Approach based on household thermal comfort , 2017 .

[27]  Meimei Wang,et al.  Social and cultural factors that influence residential location choice of urban senior citizens in China – The case of Chengdu city , 2016 .

[28]  Jung In Kim,et al.  Sustainable, age-friendly cities: An evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto, California , 2015 .

[29]  Ricardo Rodrigues,et al.  Measuring active and healthy ageing in Europe , 2017 .

[30]  A. Dey World report on ageing and health , 2017, The Indian Journal of Medical Research.

[31]  Francis K. W. Wong,et al.  Housing affordability, preferences and expectations of elderly with government intervention , 2014 .