Phonological versus phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: Korean and Dutch listeners' perception of Dutch and English consonants.

We investigated how listeners of two unrelated languages, Korean and Dutch, process phonologically viable and nonviable consonants spoken in Dutch and American English. To Korean listeners, released final stops are nonviable because word-final stops in Korean are never released in words spoken in isolation, but to Dutch listeners, unreleased word-final stops are nonviable because word-final stops in Dutch are generally released in words spoken in isolation. Two phoneme monitoring experiments showed a phonological effect on both Dutch and English stimuli: Korean listeners detected the unreleased stops more rapidly whereas Dutch listeners detected the released stops more rapidly and/or more accurately. The Koreans, however, detected released stops more accurately than unreleased stops, but only in the non-native language they were familiar with (English). The results suggest that, in non-native speech perception, phonological legitimacy in the native language can be more important than the richness of phonetic information, though familiarity with phonetic detail in the non-native language can also improve listening performance.

[1]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Acoustic and aerodynamic correlates of Korean stops and fricatives , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[2]  Bruno H. Repp,et al.  Is a stop consonant released when followed by another stop consonant , 1981 .

[3]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Katya Pertsova.  Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns: A case of contrastive palatalization (review) , 2007 .

[6]  D. Steriade.  Phonetics in Phonology: The Case of Laryngeal Neutralization , 1999 .

[7]  J. Flege.  Second Language Speech Learning Theory , Findings , and Problems , 2006 .

[8]  Julie Horrocks,et al.  The contribution of consonantal and vocalic information to the perception of Korean initial stops , 2002, J. Phonetics.

[9]  A Weber,et al.  Help or hindrance: how violation of different assimilation rules affects spoken-language processing. , 1999, Language and speech.

[10]  J. Flege.  The Interlingual Identification of Spanish and English Vowels: Orthographic Evidence , 1991 .

[11]  J. Mehler,et al.  Mora or syllable? Speech segmentation in Japanese , 1993 .

[12]  R. Wright.  Phonetically Based Phonology: A review of perceptual cues and cue robustness , 2004 .

[13]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Linguistic experience and the "perceptual magnet effect." , 1995 .

[14]  A Cutler,et al.  The representation of Japanese moraic nasals. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Daniel A. Silverman,et al.  Phasing and Recoverability , 1997 .

[16]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[17]  Elizabeth C. Zsiga.  ARTICULATORY TIMING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[18]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  The functionality of incomplete neutralization in Dutch: The case of past-tense formation , 2006 .

[19]  Young-Key Kim-Renaud.  Korean consonantal phonology , 1991 .

[20]  L Polka,et al.  A cross-language comparison of /d/-/th/ perception: evidence for a new developmental pattern. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  S. E. Martin,et al.  A Reference Grammar of Korean , 1975 .

[22]  Anne Cutler,et al.  The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English. , 1986 .

[23]  P. Jusczyk.  The discovery of spoken language , 1997 .

[24]  Janet F. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. , 1988 .

[25]  A. Weber,et al.  First-language phonotactics in second-language listening. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  L. Raphael.  Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English. , 1972, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Phonetic precision in listening , 2005 .

[28]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants , 1992 .

[29]  Edward Flemming.  Speech Perception and Phonological Contrast , 2008 .

[30]  A. Cutler,et al.  Mora or Phoneme? Further Evidence for Language-Specific Listening , 1994 .

[31]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Phonotactics vs. phonetic cues in native and non-native listening: dutch and Korean listeners' perception of dutch and English , 2004, INTERSPEECH.

[32]  R. Smits,et al.  Evaluation of various sets of acoustic cues for the perception of prevocalic stop consonants. I. Perception experiment. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  J. Werker,et al.  Developmental aspects of cross-language speech perception. , 1981, Child development.

[34]  Mirjam Broersma,et al.  Perception of familiar contrasts in unfamiliar positions. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  A. Jongman,et al.  Acoustic and perceptual evidence for complete neutralization of manner of articulation in Korean , 1996 .

[37]  Pierre A. Hallé,et al.  Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants , 1999 .

[38]  I. Mattingly.  Phonetic Representation and Speech Synthesis by Rule , 1981 .

[39]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  S. Blumstein,et al.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[41]  S G Nooteboom,et al.  Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. , 1980, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  P. Denes.  Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[44]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. III. Long-term retention of new phonetic categories. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  C. Best.  A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .