Adaptation to invisible motion results in low-level but not high-level aftereffects.

After prolonged exposure to moving stimuli, illusory motion is perceived in stimuli that do not contain consistent motion, a phenomenon termed the motion aftereffect (MAE). In this study, we tested MAEs under binocular suppression that renders the motion adaptor invisible for the entire adaptation period. We developed a variant of the continuous flash suppression method to reliably suppress target motion stimuli for durations longer than several tens of seconds. Here, we ask whether motion systems are functional in the absence of perception by measuring the MAE, a question difficult to address using binocular rivalry that accompanies a switch of percept between visible and invisible. Results show that both the MAEs with static and dynamic tests are attenuated with an invisible adaptor when the adaptor and the test stimulus are presented to the same eye. In contrast, when the test pattern was presented to the other eye, the dynamic MAE was observed in invisible adaptor conditions. These results indicate that low-level adaptation survives under total binocular suppression, a finding predicted by previous studies. In contrast, disappearance of interocular transfer in the dynamic MAE suggests that a high-level motion detector does not operate when the motion adaptor is rendered invisible.

[1]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Binocular Rivalry and Visual Awareness in Human Extrastriate Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  The neural site of binocular rivalry relative to the analysis of motion in the human visual system , 1990, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  F. Fang,et al.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness , 2006 .

[5]  C. Baker,et al.  Spatial frequency selective mechanisms underlying the motion aftereffect , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  I. M. Spigel The Effects of Differential Post-Exposure Illumination on the Decay of a Movement After-Effect , 1960 .

[7]  J. Raymond Complete interocular transfer of motion adaptation effects on motion coherence thresholds , 1993, Vision Research.

[8]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Context-dependent perceptual modulation of single neurons in primate visual cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  N. Wade,et al.  The influence of colour and contour rivalry on the magnitude of the tilt after-effect , 1978, Vision Research.

[10]  C. M. D. de Weert,et al.  On Interocular Transfer of Motion Aftereffects , 1993, Perception.

[11]  V. Lamme Towards a true neural stance on consciousness , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  S. Nishida,et al.  Complete interocular transfer of motion aftereffect with flickering test , 1994, Vision Research.

[13]  C. Koch,et al.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Engel,et al.  Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation , 2001, Nature.

[15]  B. C. Griffith,et al.  Some Observations on the Spiral After-Effect , 1959 .

[16]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Recovery from adaptation for dynamic and static motion aftereffects: Evidence for two mechanisms , 1996, Vision Research.

[18]  I. M. Spigel THE USE OF DECAY INHIBITION IN AN EXAMINATION OF CENTRAL MEDIATION IN MOVEMENT AFTEREFFECTS. , 1964, The Journal of general psychology.

[19]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  Christof Koch,et al.  Face Adaptation Depends on Seeing the Face , 2005, Neuron.

[21]  Sheng He,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns , 2001, Nature.

[22]  Irwin M. Spigel,et al.  Relation of movement aftereffect duration to interpolated darkness intervals , 1962 .

[23]  N Osaka,et al.  Difference of Spatial Frequency Selectivity between Static and Flicker Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[24]  Shin'ya Nishida,et al.  A motion aftereffect seen more strongly by the non-adapted eye: evidence of multistage adaptation in visual motion processing , 2001, Vision Research.

[25]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[26]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[27]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Independent Aftereffects of Attention and Motion , 2000, Neuron.

[28]  Hiroshi Ashida,et al.  A hierarchical structure of motion system revealed by interocular transfer of flicker motion aftereffects , 2000, Vision Research.

[29]  David Whitney,et al.  Second-order motion without awareness: Passive adaptation to second-order motion produces a motion aftereffect , 2007, Vision Research.

[30]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[31]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Depth of interocular suppression associated with continuous flash suppression, flash suppression, and binocular rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[32]  R. Fox,et al.  Effect of binocular rivalry suppression on the motion aftereffect , 1975, Vision Research.

[33]  G. Rees,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain. , 1998, Science.

[34]  R. Blake,et al.  Neural bases of binocular rivalry , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  Stuart Anstis,et al.  The After-effect of Seen Motion: The Role of Retinal Stimulation and of Eye Movements , 1965 .

[37]  R. P. O'Shea,et al.  Interocular transfer of the motion after-effect is not reduced by binocular rivalry , 1981, Vision Research.

[38]  I. M. Spigel Contour absence as a critical factor in the inhibition of the decay of a movement aftereffect. , 1962 .

[39]  S. Nishida,et al.  Motion aftereffect with flickering test patterns reveals higher stages of motion processing , 1995, Vision Research.

[40]  H. F. Crovitz,et al.  A group-test for assessing hand- and eye-dominance. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[41]  W. Miles Ocular dominance in human adults. , 1930 .

[42]  Tim Tully,et al.  Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt aftereffect from invisible patterns , 2022 .

[43]  R. Blake,et al.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. , 1974, Vision research.

[44]  Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al.  Recovery from motion adaptation is delayed by successively presented orthogonal motion , 1994, Vision Research.

[45]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.