The effects of narrow and elevated path walking on aperture crossing.

The study investigated the impact that action capabilities have on identifying possibilities for action, particularly how postural threat influences the passability of apertures. To do this, the ability to maintain balance was challenged by manipulating the level of postural threat while walking. First, participants walked along a 7m path and passed through two vertical obstacles spaced 1.1-1.5×the shoulder width apart during normal walking. Next, postural threat was manipulated by having participants complete the task either walking on a narrow, ground level path or on an elevated/narrow path. Despite a decrease in walking speed as well as an increase in trunk sway in both the narrow and elevated/narrow walking conditions, the passability of apertures was only affected when the consequence of instability was greatest. In the elevated/narrow walking condition, individuals maintained a larger critical point (rotated their shoulders for larger aperture widths) compared to normal walking. However, this effect was not observed for the narrow path walking suggesting that the level of postural threat was not enough to impose similar changes to the critical point. Therefore, it appears that manipulating action capabilities by increasing postural threat does indeed influence aperture crossing behavior, however the consequence associated with instability must be high before both gait characteristics and the critical point are affected.

[1]  Mark G. Carpenter,et al.  Fear of falling modifies anticipatory postural control , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  John M. Franchak,et al.  Perception of passage through openings depends on the size of the body in motion , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  M G Carpenter,et al.  Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[4]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[5]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Scaling affordances for human reach actions. , 2004, Human movement science.

[6]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Direct perception of action-scaled affordances: the shrinking gap problem. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  F. C. Bakker,et al.  The relevance of action in perceiving affordances: perception of catchableness of fly balls. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  M. Bobbert,et al.  Changes in walking pattern caused by the possibility of a tripping reaction. , 2001, Gait & posture.

[9]  William H. Gage,et al.  Central set influences on gait , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Michael E Cinelli,et al.  Action strategies of older adults walking through apertures. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[11]  John M. Franchak,et al.  Ledge and wedge: younger and older adults’ perception of action possibilities , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  W. Warren,et al.  Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Eyeheight-scaled information about affordances: a study of sitting and stair climbing. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Kate Wilmut,et al.  Locomotor adjustments when navigating through apertures. , 2010, Human movement science.

[15]  Jeffrey B. Wagman,et al.  Perceiving Affordances for Aperture Crossing for the Person-Plus-Object System , 2005 .

[16]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[17]  J. Frank,et al.  Surface height effects on postural control: a hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance. , 1999, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[18]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  The effects of age on medio-lateral stability during normal and narrow base walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[19]  Michael E. Cinelli,et al.  Locomotion through apertures when wider space for locomotion is necessary: adaptation to artificially altered bodily states , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Lori Ann Vallis,et al.  Action strategies of individuals during aperture crossing in nonconfined space , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  Brett R Fajen,et al.  Reconsidering the role of movement in perceiving action-scaled affordances. , 2011, Human movement science.

[22]  Michael E. Cinelli,et al.  Young and older adults use body-scaled information during a non-confined aperture crossing task , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  J. Wagman,et al.  Perception of whether an object can be carried through an aperture depends on anticipated speed. , 2007, Experimental psychology.

[24]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Guiding locomotion in complex, dynamic environments , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[25]  M. Turvey,et al.  Information, affordances, and the control of action in sport. , 2009 .

[26]  Michael E Cinelli,et al.  Is the Critical Point for Aperture Crossing Adapted to the Person-Plus-Object System? , 2014, Journal of motor behavior.

[27]  L. Brown,et al.  Obstacle negotiation kinematics: age-dependent effects of postural threat. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[28]  Brett R. Fajen,et al.  Affordance-Based Control of Visually Guided Action , 2007 .

[29]  J. Deakin,et al.  Evaluation of a psychophysiological model of classical fear conditioning in anxious patients , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  Takahiro Higuchi,et al.  Athletic experience influences shoulder rotations when running through apertures. , 2011, Human movement science.

[31]  W H Warren,et al.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.