Experimental evaluation of long- and short-term moisture damage characteristics of asphalt mixtures

Moisture damage susceptibility was evaluated using a conditioning protocol, which comprises two conditioning types, namely bath immersion and pore pressure application. The protocol was used to quantify the effect of long- and short-term moisture damage processes on asphalt mixtures. In addition, computed tomography scanning and image analysis techniques were employed to characterise damage due to pore pressure. Compacted porous asphalt samples, with various aggregate and bitumen types, were conditioned by combinations of water immersion and cyclic pore pressures by means of the moisture-induced sensitivity tester, and subsequently tested using the indirect tensile test. The results indicated that strength degradation due to moisture is influenced by the conditioning regime and time, as well as by aggregate and binder types. Overall, asphalt mixtures with polymer-modified bitumen and sandstone aggregates exhibited the best performance against moisture. Nevertheless, the long- and short-term moisture damage mechanisms had a diverse effect on mixture degradation. Repeated pore pressures were found to have a significant effect on mixture tensile strength. Image analysis revealed the effect of pore pressures on air voids content and interconnectivity of asphalt mixtures, while visual observations suggested that repeated pore pressures induce damage by opening new flow paths and eroding fine sand and mastic particles.

[1]  A. Varveri,et al.  Influence of Air Void Content on Moisture Damage Susceptibility of Asphalt Mixtures , 2014 .

[2]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Measurements of the moisture diffusion coefficient of asphalt mixtures and its relationship to mixture composition , 2009 .

[3]  Manfred N. Partl,et al.  Evaluation of moisture susceptibility of porous asphalt concrete using water submersion fatigue tests , 2009 .

[4]  Eyad Masad,et al.  Experimental Measurement and Numerical Simulation of Water Vapor Diffusion through Asphalt Pavement Materials , 2010 .

[5]  Andy Collop,et al.  Combined laboratory ageing/moisture sensitivity assessment of high modulus base asphalt mixtures , 2005 .

[6]  Peter Renken,et al.  Adhesion in Bitumen-Aggregate-Systems , 2010 .

[7]  J. Kennedy,et al.  Synthesis and Characterisation of Styrene Butadiene Styrene Based Grafted Copolymers for Use in Potential Biomedical Applications , 2011 .

[8]  Haleh Azari,et al.  Identification of Parameters Related to Moisture Conditioning that Cause Variability in Modified Lottman Test , 2009 .

[9]  P. Kandhal,et al.  WATER DAMAGE TO ASPHALT OVERLAYS: CASE HISTORIES , 1989 .

[10]  I J Rickards,et al.  PREMATURE FAILURE OF ASPHALT OVERLAYS FROM STRIPPING: CASE HISTORIES , 2001 .

[11]  Reynaldo Roque,et al.  Development and Evaluation of Test Methods to Evaluate Water Damage and Effectiveness of Antistripping Agents , 2005 .

[12]  R L Terrel,et al.  WATER SENSITIVITY OF ASPHALT-AGGREGATE MIXES: TEST SELECTION , 1994 .

[13]  Tom Scarpas,et al.  Modelling of combined physical–mechanical moisture-induced damage in asphaltic mixes, Part 1: governing processes and formulations , 2008 .

[14]  John T Harvey,et al.  Evaluation of Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device Test with Laboratory and Field Performance Data (With Discussion and Closure) , 2006 .

[15]  S. Caro,et al.  Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 1: mechanisms , 2008 .

[16]  Haleh Azari,et al.  Precision Estimates of AASHTO T283: Resistance of Compacted Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) to Moisture-Induced Damage , 2010 .

[17]  Andy Collop,et al.  Effects of Pressure and Aging in SATS Test , 2007 .

[18]  A. Scarpas,et al.  Determination of Moisture Susceptibility of Mastic-Stone Bond Strength and Comparison to Thermodynamical Properties , 2008 .

[19]  Nicole Kringos,et al.  Raveling of asphaltic mixes due to water damage : Computational identification of controlling parameters , 2005 .

[20]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Evaluation of HMA moisture damage in Wisconsin as it relates to pavement performance , 2008 .

[21]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Moisture Damage Evaluation of Asphalt Mixtures by Considering Both Moisture Diffusion and Repeated-Load Conditions , 2003 .

[22]  Athanasios Scarpas,et al.  A Mechanics based Computational Platform for Pavement Engineering , 2005 .

[23]  F L Roberts,et al.  Stripping in HMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Art and Critical Review of Test Methods , 1988 .

[24]  R L Terrel,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE HAMBURG WHEEL-TRACKING DEVICE AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONING SYSTEM TO PAVEMENTS OF KNOWN STRIPPING PERFORMANCE. FINAL REPORT , 1994 .

[25]  Alex K. Apeagyei,et al.  Evaluation of Moisture Sorption and Diffusion Characteristics of Asphalt Mastics Using Manual and Automated Gravimetric Sorption Techniques , 2014 .

[26]  M. Asce,et al.  On the Variability of Results from the Hamburg Wheel Tracker Device , 2013 .